Thermal, mechanical and electrical stimuli in antinociceptive studies in standing horses : an update
- Author
- Miguel Gozalo-Marcilla, Stelio Pacca Loureiro Luna, Frank Gasthuys (UGent) and Stijn Schauvliege (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- Objective To perform a literature review of the thermal and mechanical antinociceptive devices used in pharmacological studies in standing horses published after 2011 (2012-2019). To complete a full literature review about electrical stimulation used for evaluation in similar studies. Databases used PubMed, Google Scholar and Web of Science. Conclusions A high level of standardization has been reached in antinociceptive studies in standing horses using thermal and mechanical stimuli in most recent years. Commercially available testing devices to deliver thermal, mechanical and electrical stimuli, with observation of aversive responses to these stimuli, are reliable, sensitive and specific. For electrical stimulus testing, there is evidence that the resistance between the electrodes should be measured and should not exceed 3 k Omega to guarantee consistent and reproducible stimuli. The specific analysis of electromyographic activity after an electrical stimulus provides more detailed information about the neurons stimulated.
- Keywords
- NOCICEPTIVE WITHDRAWAL REFLEX, TEMPORAL SUMMATION, SOMATIC NOCICEPTION, EVOKED-POTENTIALS, DUODENAL MOTILITY, PAIN THRESHOLD, BACK-PAIN, 2ND PAIN, C-FIBER, DETOMIDINE, antinociception, electrical, mechanical, standing horses, thermal, threshold
Downloads
-
(...).pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 349.58 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8654334
- MLA
- Gozalo-Marcilla, Miguel, et al. “Thermal, Mechanical and Electrical Stimuli in Antinociceptive Studies in Standing Horses : An Update.” VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, vol. 47, no. 1, 2020, pp. 15–27, doi:10.1016/j.vaa.2019.09.003.
- APA
- Gozalo-Marcilla, M., Loureiro Luna, S. P., Gasthuys, F., & Schauvliege, S. (2020). Thermal, mechanical and electrical stimuli in antinociceptive studies in standing horses : an update. VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 47(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2019.09.003
- Chicago author-date
- Gozalo-Marcilla, Miguel, Stelio Pacca Loureiro Luna, Frank Gasthuys, and Stijn Schauvliege. 2020. “Thermal, Mechanical and Electrical Stimuli in Antinociceptive Studies in Standing Horses : An Update.” VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA 47 (1): 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2019.09.003.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Gozalo-Marcilla, Miguel, Stelio Pacca Loureiro Luna, Frank Gasthuys, and Stijn Schauvliege. 2020. “Thermal, Mechanical and Electrical Stimuli in Antinociceptive Studies in Standing Horses : An Update.” VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA 47 (1): 15–27. doi:10.1016/j.vaa.2019.09.003.
- Vancouver
- 1.Gozalo-Marcilla M, Loureiro Luna SP, Gasthuys F, Schauvliege S. Thermal, mechanical and electrical stimuli in antinociceptive studies in standing horses : an update. VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA. 2020;47(1):15–27.
- IEEE
- [1]M. Gozalo-Marcilla, S. P. Loureiro Luna, F. Gasthuys, and S. Schauvliege, “Thermal, mechanical and electrical stimuli in antinociceptive studies in standing horses : an update,” VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 15–27, 2020.
@article{8654334,
abstract = {{Objective To perform a literature review of the thermal and mechanical antinociceptive devices used in pharmacological studies in standing horses published after 2011 (2012-2019). To complete a full literature review about electrical stimulation used for evaluation in similar studies. Databases used PubMed, Google Scholar and Web of Science. Conclusions A high level of standardization has been reached in antinociceptive studies in standing horses using thermal and mechanical stimuli in most recent years. Commercially available testing devices to deliver thermal, mechanical and electrical stimuli, with observation of aversive responses to these stimuli, are reliable, sensitive and specific. For electrical stimulus testing, there is evidence that the resistance between the electrodes should be measured and should not exceed 3 k Omega to guarantee consistent and reproducible stimuli. The specific analysis of electromyographic activity after an electrical stimulus provides more detailed information about the neurons stimulated.}},
author = {{Gozalo-Marcilla, Miguel and Loureiro Luna, Stelio Pacca and Gasthuys, Frank and Schauvliege, Stijn}},
issn = {{1467-2987}},
journal = {{VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA}},
keywords = {{NOCICEPTIVE WITHDRAWAL REFLEX,TEMPORAL SUMMATION,SOMATIC NOCICEPTION,EVOKED-POTENTIALS,DUODENAL MOTILITY,PAIN THRESHOLD,BACK-PAIN,2ND PAIN,C-FIBER,DETOMIDINE,antinociception,electrical,mechanical,standing horses,thermal,threshold}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{1}},
pages = {{15--27}},
title = {{Thermal, mechanical and electrical stimuli in antinociceptive studies in standing horses : an update}},
url = {{http://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaa.2019.09.003}},
volume = {{47}},
year = {{2020}},
}
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: