Academic Bibliography

 Search 200 years of publications by Ghent University researchers.
Advanced search
1 file | 71.53 KB
Add to list
  1. Search results
  2. Do minorities perceive procedural fai...

Do minorities perceive procedural fairness merely in terms of ethnic bias suppression? Evaluation of the concept of fairness in multicultural conflicts

Kim Dierckx (UGent) , Alain Van Hiel (UGent) and Barbara Valcke (UGent)
(2022) JOURNAL OF ETHNIC AND MIGRATION STUDIES. 48(13). p.3344-3364
Author
Organization
Project
Abstract
The present study investigated the impact of perceived procedural fairness enacted by societal actors on minority members' willingness to accept decisions regarding multicultural issues. We particularly focused on ethnic bias suppression, which we expected to be highly salient in this type of conflict and deemed pivotal given its impact on the collective social self. Four studies (one cross-sectional study and three experiments) were conducted in African American minority samples. The results revealed that: (1) perceptions of procedural fairness cannot be reduced to solely evaluations of ethnic bias suppression, (2) the weight placed on bias suppression is indeed substantial, (3) procedural fairness and bias suppression each play a strong role in shaping minority members' legitimacy perceptions of a decision-maker, and in turn, (4) decision acceptance. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Keywords
Procedural fairness, ethnic bias suppression, legitimacy, decision acceptance, multicultural conflicts, JUSTICE CLIMATE, LEGITIMACY, ACCEPTANCE, DECISION, IMPACT, DISCRIMINATION, PERCEPTIONS, ALLOCATION, AMERICAN

Downloads

  • Download
    Manuscript ProceduralFairness BiasSuppression inMulticulturalConflicts R1.docx
    • full text (Accepted manuscript)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • Word
    • |
    • 71.53 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Dierckx, Kim, et al. “Do Minorities Perceive Procedural Fairness Merely in Terms of Ethnic Bias Suppression? Evaluation of the Concept of Fairness in Multicultural Conflicts.” JOURNAL OF ETHNIC AND MIGRATION STUDIES, vol. 48, no. 13, 2022, pp. 3344–64, doi:10.1080/1369183X.2020.1726733.
APA
Dierckx, K., Van Hiel, A., & Valcke, B. (2022). Do minorities perceive procedural fairness merely in terms of ethnic bias suppression? Evaluation of the concept of fairness in multicultural conflicts. JOURNAL OF ETHNIC AND MIGRATION STUDIES, 48(13), 3344–3364. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1726733
Chicago author-date
Dierckx, Kim, Alain Van Hiel, and Barbara Valcke. 2022. “Do Minorities Perceive Procedural Fairness Merely in Terms of Ethnic Bias Suppression? Evaluation of the Concept of Fairness in Multicultural Conflicts.” JOURNAL OF ETHNIC AND MIGRATION STUDIES 48 (13): 3344–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1726733.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Dierckx, Kim, Alain Van Hiel, and Barbara Valcke. 2022. “Do Minorities Perceive Procedural Fairness Merely in Terms of Ethnic Bias Suppression? Evaluation of the Concept of Fairness in Multicultural Conflicts.” JOURNAL OF ETHNIC AND MIGRATION STUDIES 48 (13): 3344–3364. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2020.1726733.
Vancouver
1.
Dierckx K, Van Hiel A, Valcke B. Do minorities perceive procedural fairness merely in terms of ethnic bias suppression? Evaluation of the concept of fairness in multicultural conflicts. JOURNAL OF ETHNIC AND MIGRATION STUDIES. 2022;48(13):3344–64.
IEEE
[1]
K. Dierckx, A. Van Hiel, and B. Valcke, “Do minorities perceive procedural fairness merely in terms of ethnic bias suppression? Evaluation of the concept of fairness in multicultural conflicts,” JOURNAL OF ETHNIC AND MIGRATION STUDIES, vol. 48, no. 13, pp. 3344–3364, 2022.
@article{8653319,
  abstract     = {{The present study investigated the impact of perceived procedural fairness enacted by societal actors on minority members' willingness to accept decisions regarding multicultural issues. We particularly focused on ethnic bias suppression, which we expected to be highly salient in this type of conflict and deemed pivotal given its impact on the collective social self. Four studies (one cross-sectional study and three experiments) were conducted in African American minority samples. The results revealed that: (1) perceptions of procedural fairness cannot be reduced to solely evaluations of ethnic bias suppression, (2) the weight placed on bias suppression is indeed substantial, (3) procedural fairness and bias suppression each play a strong role in shaping minority members' legitimacy perceptions of a decision-maker, and in turn, (4) decision acceptance. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.}},
  author       = {{Dierckx, Kim and Van Hiel, Alain and Valcke, Barbara}},
  issn         = {{1369-183X}},
  journal      = {{JOURNAL OF ETHNIC AND MIGRATION STUDIES}},
  keywords     = {{Procedural fairness,ethnic bias suppression,legitimacy,decision acceptance,multicultural conflicts,JUSTICE CLIMATE,LEGITIMACY,ACCEPTANCE,DECISION,IMPACT,DISCRIMINATION,PERCEPTIONS,ALLOCATION,AMERICAN}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{13}},
  pages        = {{3344--3364}},
  title        = {{Do minorities perceive procedural fairness merely in terms of ethnic bias suppression? Evaluation of the concept of fairness in multicultural conflicts}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1726733}},
  volume       = {{48}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}
Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: