@article{8649256,
  abstract     = {{BackgroundIn the organization of health care and health care systems, there is an increasing trend towards integrated care. Policy-makers from different countries are creating policies intended to promote cooperation and collaboration between health care providers, while facilitating the integration of different health care services. Hopes are high, as such collaboration and integration of care are believed to save resources and improve quality. However, policy-makers are likely to encounter various challenges and limitations when attempting to turn these great ideas into effective policies. In this paper, we look into these challenges.Main bodyWe argue that the organization of health care and integrated care is of public concern, and should thus be of crucial interest to policy-makers. We highlight three challenges or limitations likely to be encountered by policy-makers in integrated care. These are: (1) conceptual challenges; (2) empirical/methodological challenges; and (3) resource challenges. We will argue that it is still unclear what integrated care means and how we should measure it. 'Integrated care' is a single label that can refer to a great number of different processes. It can describe the integration of care for individual patients, the integration of services aimed at particular patient groups or particular conditions, or it can refer to institution-wide collaborations between different health care providers. We subsequently argue that health reform inevitably possesses a political context that should be taken into account. We also show how evidence supporting integrated care may not guarantee success in every context. Finally, we will discuss how promoting collaboration and integration might actually demand more resources. In the final section, we look at three different paradigmatic examples of integrated care policy: Norway, the UK's NHS, and Belgium.ConclusionsThere seems widespread agreement that collaboration and integration are the way forward for health care and health care systems. Nevertheless, we argue that policy-makers should remain careful; they should carefully consider what they hope to achieve, the amount of resources they are willing to invest, and how they will evaluate the success of their policy.}},
  articleno    = {{130}},
  author       = {{Raus, Kasper and Mortier, Eric and Eeckloo, Kristof}},
  issn         = {{1472-6963}},
  journal      = {{BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH}},
  keywords     = {{Integrated care,Health policy,Collaboration,QUADRUPLE AIM CARE,PUBLIC-HEALTH,UNDERSTANDING HEALTH,CLINICAL NETWORKS,COLLABORATION,GOVERNANCE,HIERARCHY,POLITICS,TRIPLE}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{9}},
  title        = {{Challenges in turning a great idea into great health policy : the case of integrated care}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4950-z}},
  volume       = {{20}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

Altmetric

View in Altmetric

Web of Science

Times cited: