Advanced search
1 file | 550.06 KB Add to list

Comparing different approaches for mapping urban vegetation cover from Landsat ETM+ data : a case study on Brussels

(2008) SENSORS. 8(6). p.3880-3902
Author
Organization
Abstract
Urban growth and its related environmental problems call for sustainable urban management policies to safeguard the quality of urban environments. Vegetation plays an important part in this as it provides ecological, social, health and economic benefits to a city's inhabitants. Remotely sensed data are of great value to monitor urban green and despite the clear advantages of contemporary high resolution images, the benefits of medium resolution data should not be discarded. The objective of this research was to estimate fractional vegetation cover from a Landsat ETM+ image with sub-pixel classification, and to compare accuracies obtained with multiple stepwise regression analysis, linear spectral unmixing and multi-layer perceptrons (MLP) at the level of meaningful urban spatial entities. Despite the small, but nevertheless statistically significant differences at pixel level between the alternative approaches, the spatial pattern of vegetation cover and estimation errors is clearly distinctive at neighbourhood level. At this spatially aggregated level, a simple regression model appears to attain sufficient accuracy. For mapping at a spatially more detailed level, the MLP seems to be the most appropriate choice. Brightness normalisation only appeared to affect the linear models, especially the linear spectral unmixing.
Keywords
SPECTRAL MIXTURE ANALYSIS, IMPERVIOUS SURFACE, SUBPIXEL ANALYSIS, ABUNDANCE, MODEL, CLASSIFICATIONS, ENVIRONMENTS, REFLECTANCE, MORPHOLOGY, urban vegetation cover, spectral mixture analysis, multi-layer, perceptrons

Downloads

  • sensors-08-03880.pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 550.06 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Van de Voorde, Tim, et al. “Comparing Different Approaches for Mapping Urban Vegetation Cover from Landsat ETM+ Data : A Case Study on Brussels.” SENSORS, vol. 8, no. 6, 2008, pp. 3880–902.
APA
Van de Voorde, T., Vlaeminck, J., & Canters, F. (2008). Comparing different approaches for mapping urban vegetation cover from Landsat ETM+ data : a case study on Brussels. SENSORS, 8(6), 3880–3902.
Chicago author-date
Van de Voorde, Tim, Jeroen Vlaeminck, and Frank Canters. 2008. “Comparing Different Approaches for Mapping Urban Vegetation Cover from Landsat ETM+ Data : A Case Study on Brussels.” SENSORS 8 (6): 3880–3902.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Van de Voorde, Tim, Jeroen Vlaeminck, and Frank Canters. 2008. “Comparing Different Approaches for Mapping Urban Vegetation Cover from Landsat ETM+ Data : A Case Study on Brussels.” SENSORS 8 (6): 3880–3902.
Vancouver
1.
Van de Voorde T, Vlaeminck J, Canters F. Comparing different approaches for mapping urban vegetation cover from Landsat ETM+ data : a case study on Brussels. SENSORS. 2008;8(6):3880–902.
IEEE
[1]
T. Van de Voorde, J. Vlaeminck, and F. Canters, “Comparing different approaches for mapping urban vegetation cover from Landsat ETM+ data : a case study on Brussels,” SENSORS, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 3880–3902, 2008.
@article{8645250,
  abstract     = {Urban growth and its related environmental problems call for sustainable urban management policies to safeguard the quality of urban environments. Vegetation plays an important part in this as it provides ecological, social, health and economic benefits to a city's inhabitants. Remotely sensed data are of great value to monitor urban green and despite the clear advantages of contemporary high resolution images, the benefits of medium resolution data should not be discarded. The objective of this research was to estimate fractional vegetation cover from a Landsat ETM+ image with sub-pixel classification, and to compare accuracies obtained with multiple stepwise regression analysis, linear spectral unmixing and multi-layer perceptrons (MLP) at the level of meaningful urban spatial entities. Despite the small, but nevertheless statistically significant differences at pixel level between the alternative approaches, the spatial pattern of vegetation cover and estimation errors is clearly distinctive at neighbourhood level. At this spatially aggregated level, a simple regression model appears to attain sufficient accuracy. For mapping at a spatially more detailed level, the MLP seems to be the most appropriate choice. Brightness normalisation only appeared to affect the linear models, especially the linear spectral unmixing.},
  author       = {Van de Voorde, Tim and Vlaeminck, Jeroen and Canters, Frank},
  issn         = {1424-8220},
  journal      = {SENSORS},
  keywords     = {SPECTRAL MIXTURE ANALYSIS,IMPERVIOUS SURFACE,SUBPIXEL ANALYSIS,ABUNDANCE,MODEL,CLASSIFICATIONS,ENVIRONMENTS,REFLECTANCE,MORPHOLOGY,urban vegetation cover,spectral mixture analysis,multi-layer,perceptrons},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {6},
  pages        = {3880--3902},
  title        = {Comparing different approaches for mapping urban vegetation cover from Landsat ETM+ data : a case study on Brussels},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s8063880},
  volume       = {8},
  year         = {2008},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: