Advanced search
1 file | 1.69 MB Add to list

Cotextual cues for the annotation of perspective in Livy's Ab Urbe condita

Simon Aerts (UGent)
(2019) PHILOLOGIA CLASSICA. 14(2). p.216-238
Author
Organization
Abstract
The current paper examines the statistical correlation between a number of cotextual cues and the latent variable of perspective in a corpus of episodes taken from Livy's narrative. The possible perspectives (external, internal, scenic camera-eye, immersive eyewitness and distanced eyewitness; cf. "focalization" in narratological studies) featured in Latin historiographical narratives are introduced and hypothesized to co-occur with a number of lexical (e.g. evaluative, descriptive), deictic (e.g. proximal, distal) and grammatical (e.g. voice) elements in the cotext of events and situations occurring in the main narrative tenses (especially the perfect, imperfect, and present indicative). During the analysis, statistical tests are used to ascertain the combined impact of these cues on (a) Livy's choice of verb tense and (b) the linguist's annotation of perspective. While the former is objectively observable, the latter relies on the functional linguist's interpretation as a non-native speaker. Therefore, an additional test is used to show the correlations between the different narrative tenses and the perspectives to corroborate the results. This paper's findings pave the way for a more systematic and objective annotation method for the latent variable of perspective in Latin narratives. Its argumentation is built on the statistical tests performed on the data gathered in close readings on a larger scale. From those close readings, some examples are provided in the current paper to illustrate specific or challenging concepts
Keywords
Latin tense system, tense and aspect, Systemic Functional Linguistics, perspective, text linguistics, corpus linguistics, linguistic proxies, Livius, Latin tense system, tense and aspect, Systemic Functional Linguistics, perspective, text linguistics, corpus linguistics, multivariate statistics, linguistic proxies, Conditional Inference Tree, Livius

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 1.69 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Aerts, Simon. “Cotextual Cues for the Annotation of Perspective in Livy’s Ab Urbe Condita.” PHILOLOGIA CLASSICA, vol. 14, no. 2, 2019, pp. 216–38.
APA
Aerts, S. (2019). Cotextual cues for the annotation of perspective in Livy’s Ab Urbe condita. PHILOLOGIA CLASSICA, 14(2), 216–238.
Chicago author-date
Aerts, Simon. 2019. “Cotextual Cues for the Annotation of Perspective in Livy’s Ab Urbe Condita.” PHILOLOGIA CLASSICA 14 (2): 216–38.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Aerts, Simon. 2019. “Cotextual Cues for the Annotation of Perspective in Livy’s Ab Urbe Condita.” PHILOLOGIA CLASSICA 14 (2): 216–238.
Vancouver
1.
Aerts S. Cotextual cues for the annotation of perspective in Livy’s Ab Urbe condita. PHILOLOGIA CLASSICA. 2019;14(2):216–38.
IEEE
[1]
S. Aerts, “Cotextual cues for the annotation of perspective in Livy’s Ab Urbe condita,” PHILOLOGIA CLASSICA, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 216–238, 2019.
@article{8644756,
  abstract     = {The current paper examines the statistical correlation between a number of cotextual cues and the latent variable of perspective in a corpus of episodes taken from Livy's narrative. The possible perspectives (external, internal, scenic camera-eye, immersive eyewitness and distanced eyewitness; cf. "focalization" in narratological studies) featured in Latin historiographical narratives are introduced and hypothesized to co-occur with a number of lexical (e.g. evaluative, descriptive), deictic (e.g. proximal, distal) and grammatical (e.g. voice) elements in the cotext of events and situations occurring in the main narrative tenses (especially the perfect, imperfect, and present indicative). During the analysis, statistical tests are used to ascertain the combined impact of these cues on (a) Livy's choice of verb tense and (b) the linguist's annotation of perspective. While the former is objectively observable, the latter relies on the functional linguist's interpretation as a non-native speaker. Therefore, an additional test is used to show the correlations between the different narrative tenses and the perspectives to corroborate the results. This paper's findings pave the way for a more systematic and objective annotation method for the latent variable of perspective in Latin narratives. Its argumentation is built on the statistical tests performed on the data gathered in close readings on a larger scale. From those close readings, some examples are provided in the current paper to illustrate specific or challenging concepts},
  author       = {Aerts, Simon},
  issn         = {0202-2532},
  journal      = {PHILOLOGIA CLASSICA},
  keywords     = {Latin tense system,tense and aspect,Systemic Functional Linguistics,perspective,text linguistics,corpus linguistics,linguistic proxies,Livius,Latin tense system,tense and aspect,Systemic Functional Linguistics,perspective,text linguistics,corpus linguistics,multivariate statistics,linguistic proxies,Conditional Inference Tree,Livius},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {2},
  pages        = {216--238},
  title        = {Cotextual cues for the annotation of perspective in Livy's Ab Urbe condita},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu20.2019.204},
  volume       = {14},
  year         = {2019},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric