Measuring walking-related performance fatigability in clinical practice : a systematic review
- Author
- Fanny Van Geel, Lousin Moumddjian (UGent) , Ilse Lamers, Hanne Bielen and Peter Feys
- Organization
- Abstract
- INTRODUCTION: Fatigability, a change in performance according to tasks and circumstances, can contribute to walking limitations in daily life. Walking-related fatigability (WF) has been assessed subjectively, but current knowledge on best objective measurement methods is limited. The aim of this study was to provide an overview of objective clinical measurement methods assessing WF in different populations. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Articles were searched in Pubmed and Web Of Science by two independent raters. Studies were included when meeting inclusion criteria of measuring WF objectively in a clinical setting, with no exclusion towards any population. Case studies and reviews were not included in the review (systematic review registration number: PROSPERO - CRD42017074121). In total, 28 articles were included. The study populations were older adults (N.=7), multiple sclerosis (N.=14), spinal muscle atrophy (N.=3), osteoarthritis (N.=3), interstitial lung diseases (N.=1), and myasthenia gravis (N.=1). Data about patient characteristics, walking task, WF formula and interpretation (cut-off values and/or psychometric properties) got extracted from included literature. Every included article got checked for quality and risk of bias. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: WF was mostly measured during longer walking test such as six-minute walking test (6MWT) and 500 or 400-m walking test, by comparing the first and last minute or lap for spatiotemporal or kinematic changes in well-defined formulas. No gold standard is however available yet given different tasks or outcome measures across study populations. CONCLUSIONS: Longer walking test were most often used, with a preference towards the 6MWT, thereby comparing the changes over the last and first part of the test. Psychometric properties need more documentation before inclusion as experimental outcome.
- Keywords
- Fatigue, Motor fatigability, Walking, Assessment, Clinical Practice, Outcome and process assessment (health care), 6-MINUTE WALK, MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS, MOTOR FATIGUE, OLDER-ADULTS, COGNITIVE FATIGABILITY, 6 MINUTES, STRENGTH, EXERCISE, DISTANCE, PEOPLE
Downloads
-
(...).pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 2.17 MB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8643733
- MLA
- Van Geel, Fanny, et al. “Measuring Walking-Related Performance Fatigability in Clinical Practice : A Systematic Review.” EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, vol. 56, no. 1, 2020, pp. 88–103, doi:10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05878-7.
- APA
- Van Geel, F., Moumddjian, L., Lamers, I., Bielen, H., & Feys, P. (2020). Measuring walking-related performance fatigability in clinical practice : a systematic review. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 56(1), 88–103. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05878-7
- Chicago author-date
- Van Geel, Fanny, Lousin Moumddjian, Ilse Lamers, Hanne Bielen, and Peter Feys. 2020. “Measuring Walking-Related Performance Fatigability in Clinical Practice : A Systematic Review.” EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE 56 (1): 88–103. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05878-7.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Van Geel, Fanny, Lousin Moumddjian, Ilse Lamers, Hanne Bielen, and Peter Feys. 2020. “Measuring Walking-Related Performance Fatigability in Clinical Practice : A Systematic Review.” EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE 56 (1): 88–103. doi:10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05878-7.
- Vancouver
- 1.Van Geel F, Moumddjian L, Lamers I, Bielen H, Feys P. Measuring walking-related performance fatigability in clinical practice : a systematic review. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE. 2020;56(1):88–103.
- IEEE
- [1]F. Van Geel, L. Moumddjian, I. Lamers, H. Bielen, and P. Feys, “Measuring walking-related performance fatigability in clinical practice : a systematic review,” EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 88–103, 2020.
@article{8643733, abstract = {{INTRODUCTION: Fatigability, a change in performance according to tasks and circumstances, can contribute to walking limitations in daily life. Walking-related fatigability (WF) has been assessed subjectively, but current knowledge on best objective measurement methods is limited. The aim of this study was to provide an overview of objective clinical measurement methods assessing WF in different populations. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Articles were searched in Pubmed and Web Of Science by two independent raters. Studies were included when meeting inclusion criteria of measuring WF objectively in a clinical setting, with no exclusion towards any population. Case studies and reviews were not included in the review (systematic review registration number: PROSPERO - CRD42017074121). In total, 28 articles were included. The study populations were older adults (N.=7), multiple sclerosis (N.=14), spinal muscle atrophy (N.=3), osteoarthritis (N.=3), interstitial lung diseases (N.=1), and myasthenia gravis (N.=1). Data about patient characteristics, walking task, WF formula and interpretation (cut-off values and/or psychometric properties) got extracted from included literature. Every included article got checked for quality and risk of bias. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: WF was mostly measured during longer walking test such as six-minute walking test (6MWT) and 500 or 400-m walking test, by comparing the first and last minute or lap for spatiotemporal or kinematic changes in well-defined formulas. No gold standard is however available yet given different tasks or outcome measures across study populations. CONCLUSIONS: Longer walking test were most often used, with a preference towards the 6MWT, thereby comparing the changes over the last and first part of the test. Psychometric properties need more documentation before inclusion as experimental outcome.}}, author = {{Van Geel, Fanny and Moumddjian, Lousin and Lamers, Ilse and Bielen, Hanne and Feys, Peter}}, issn = {{1973-9087}}, journal = {{EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE}}, keywords = {{Fatigue,Motor fatigability,Walking,Assessment,Clinical Practice,Outcome and process assessment (health care),6-MINUTE WALK,MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS,MOTOR FATIGUE,OLDER-ADULTS,COGNITIVE FATIGABILITY,6 MINUTES,STRENGTH,EXERCISE,DISTANCE,PEOPLE}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{88--103}}, title = {{Measuring walking-related performance fatigability in clinical practice : a systematic review}}, url = {{http://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.19.05878-7}}, volume = {{56}}, year = {{2020}}, }
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: