Advanced search
1 file | 5.79 MB Add to list

A novel hybrid 3D endoscope zooming and repositioning system : design and feasibility study

Author
Organization
Abstract
Background: Manipulation of the endoscope during minimally invasive surgery is a major source of inconvenience and discomfort. This report elucidates the architecture of a novel one-hand controlled endoscope positioning device and presents a practicability evaluation. Methods and materials: Setup time and total surgery time, number and duration of the manipulations, side effects of three-dimensional (3D) imaging, and ergonomic complaints were assessed by three surgeons during cadaveric and in vivo porcine trials. Results: Setup was accomplished in an average (SD) of 230 (120) seconds. The manipulation time was 3.87 (1.77) seconds for angular movements and 0.83 (0.24) seconds for zooming, with an average (SD) of 30.5 (16.3) manipulations per procedure. No side effects of 3D imaging or ergonomic complaints were reported. Conclusions: The integration of an active zoom into a passive endoscope holder delivers a convenient synergy between a human and a machine-controlled holding device. It is shown to be safe, simple, and intuitive to use and allows unrestrained autonomic control of the endoscope by the surgeon.
Keywords
endoscope positioner, minimally invasive surgery, solo surgery, surgical assistant, ROBOTIC LAPAROSCOPE HOLDER, VENTRAL MESH RECTOPEXY, SOLO SURGERY, RECTAL PROLAPSE, CAMERA-HOLDER, IN-VIVO, PERFORMANCE, TECHNOLOGY, VALIDATION

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 5.79 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
De Pauw, Tim, et al. “A Novel Hybrid 3D Endoscope Zooming and Repositioning System : Design and Feasibility Study.” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, vol. 16, no. 1, 2020, doi:10.1002/rcs.2050.
APA
De Pauw, T., Kalmar, A., Van de Putte, D., Mabilde, C., Blanckaert, B., Maene, L., … Dewaele, F. (2020). A novel hybrid 3D endoscope zooming and repositioning system : design and feasibility study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2050
Chicago author-date
De Pauw, Tim, Alain Kalmar, Dirk Van de Putte, Cyriel Mabilde, Bart Blanckaert, Lieven Maene, Mauranne Lievens, et al. 2020. “A Novel Hybrid 3D Endoscope Zooming and Repositioning System : Design and Feasibility Study.” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY 16 (1). https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2050.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
De Pauw, Tim, Alain Kalmar, Dirk Van de Putte, Cyriel Mabilde, Bart Blanckaert, Lieven Maene, Mauranne Lievens, Anne-Sophie Van Haver, Kevin Bauwens, Yves Van Nieuwenhove, and Frank Dewaele. 2020. “A Novel Hybrid 3D Endoscope Zooming and Repositioning System : Design and Feasibility Study.” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY 16 (1). doi:10.1002/rcs.2050.
Vancouver
1.
De Pauw T, Kalmar A, Van de Putte D, Mabilde C, Blanckaert B, Maene L, et al. A novel hybrid 3D endoscope zooming and repositioning system : design and feasibility study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY. 2020;16(1).
IEEE
[1]
T. De Pauw et al., “A novel hybrid 3D endoscope zooming and repositioning system : design and feasibility study,” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, vol. 16, no. 1, 2020.
@article{8642144,
  abstract     = {{Background: Manipulation of the endoscope during minimally invasive surgery is a major source of inconvenience and discomfort. This report elucidates the architecture of a novel one-hand controlled endoscope positioning device and presents a practicability evaluation.
Methods and materials: Setup time and total surgery time, number and duration of the manipulations, side effects of three-dimensional (3D) imaging, and ergonomic complaints were assessed by three surgeons during cadaveric and in vivo porcine trials.
Results: Setup was accomplished in an average (SD) of 230 (120) seconds. The manipulation time was 3.87 (1.77) seconds for angular movements and 0.83 (0.24) seconds for zooming, with an average (SD) of 30.5 (16.3) manipulations per procedure. No side effects of 3D imaging or ergonomic complaints were reported.
Conclusions: The integration of an active zoom into a passive endoscope holder delivers a convenient synergy between a human and a machine-controlled holding device. It is shown to be safe, simple, and intuitive to use and allows unrestrained autonomic control of the endoscope by the surgeon.}},
  articleno    = {{e2050}},
  author       = {{De Pauw, Tim and Kalmar, Alain and Van de Putte, Dirk and Mabilde, Cyriel and Blanckaert, Bart and Maene, Lieven and Lievens, Mauranne and Van Haver, Anne-Sophie and Bauwens, Kevin and Van Nieuwenhove, Yves and Dewaele, Frank}},
  issn         = {{1478-5951}},
  journal      = {{INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY}},
  keywords     = {{endoscope positioner,minimally invasive surgery,solo surgery,surgical assistant,ROBOTIC LAPAROSCOPE HOLDER,VENTRAL MESH RECTOPEXY,SOLO SURGERY,RECTAL PROLAPSE,CAMERA-HOLDER,IN-VIVO,PERFORMANCE,TECHNOLOGY,VALIDATION}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{6}},
  title        = {{A novel hybrid 3D endoscope zooming and repositioning system : design and feasibility study}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2050}},
  volume       = {{16}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: