Academic Bibliography

 Search 200 years of publications by Ghent University researchers.
Advanced search
1 file | 152.42 KB
Add to list
  1. Search results
  2. Universiteiten, proef Engels, toelati...

Universiteiten, proef Engels, toelatingsproef: slaagkansen, manipulatie, gezichtsbedrog

Frank Roels (UGent)
(2013) DeWereldMorgen.be.
Author
Organization
Abstract
Analysis of the public discussion about failing university students, and tests of English language for professors. Selection of students is proposed; but I argue that is cheating because it is not improving individual results. So is the proposal for publication of the results according to high schools so that individual schools are compared. Another way of cheating is to imperceptibly modify examination conditions. I am in favor that students who fail can do a year over; I have shown that age and experience at the university improve results. The ITACE test for academic English is difficult; so the Catholic University of Leuven invented its own test.
Keywords
Torfs, Peter Van Peteghem, Wim Vandenbroek, André Oosterlinck, ITACE, Fientje Moerman, Hendrik Bogaert, Geert Bourgeois

Downloads

  • Download
    Slaagkansen manipulatie gezichtsbedrog.docx
    • full text
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • Word
    • |
    • 152.42 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Roels, Frank. “Universiteiten, Proef Engels, Toelatingsproef: Slaagkansen, Manipulatie, Gezichtsbedrog.” DeWereldMorgen.Be, no. Oct 2nd, 2013.
APA
Roels, F. (2013). Universiteiten, proef Engels, toelatingsproef: slaagkansen, manipulatie, gezichtsbedrog. DeWereldMorgen.Be, (Oct 2nd).
Chicago author-date
Roels, Frank. 2013. “Universiteiten, Proef Engels, Toelatingsproef: Slaagkansen, Manipulatie, Gezichtsbedrog.” DeWereldMorgen.Be, no. Oct 2nd.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Roels, Frank. 2013. “Universiteiten, Proef Engels, Toelatingsproef: Slaagkansen, Manipulatie, Gezichtsbedrog.” DeWereldMorgen.Be (Oct 2nd).
Vancouver
1.
Roels F. Universiteiten, proef Engels, toelatingsproef: slaagkansen, manipulatie, gezichtsbedrog. DeWereldMorgen.be. 2013;(Oct 2nd).
IEEE
[1]
F. Roels, “Universiteiten, proef Engels, toelatingsproef: slaagkansen, manipulatie, gezichtsbedrog,” DeWereldMorgen.be, no. Oct 2nd, 2013.
@article{8639834,
  abstract     = {{Analysis of the public discussion about failing university students, and tests of English language for professors. Selection of students is proposed; but I argue that is cheating because it is not improving individual results. So is the proposal for publication of the results according to high schools so that individual schools are compared. Another way of cheating is to imperceptibly modify examination conditions. I am in favor that students who fail can do a year over; I have shown that age and experience at the university improve results.
The ITACE test for academic English is difficult; so the Catholic University  of Leuven invented its own test.}},
  author       = {{Roels, Frank}},
  journal      = {{DeWereldMorgen.be}},
  keywords     = {{Torfs,Peter Van Peteghem,Wim Vandenbroek,André Oosterlinck,ITACE,Fientje Moerman,Hendrik Bogaert,Geert Bourgeois}},
  language     = {{dut}},
  number       = {{Oct 2nd}},
  pages        = {{3}},
  title        = {{Universiteiten, proef Engels, toelatingsproef: slaagkansen, manipulatie, gezichtsbedrog}},
  url          = {{https://www.dewereldmorgen.be/community/slaagkansen-manipulatie-gezichtsbedrog/}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}