Advanced search
1 file | 410.24 KB Add to list

Modern theories of product warnings and European product liability law

Thomas Verheyen (UGent)
(2019) UTRECHT LAW REVIEW. 15(3). p.44-56
Author
Organization
Abstract
Scholars inside and outside Europe have recently argued that product liability law should recognise the sheer complexity of designing an adequate warning. In the US, for instance, it has been suggested that a plaintiff bringing a claim based on a defective warning should be required to prove which reasonable alternative warning would have prevented her from suffering harm. While much can be said in favour of a more refined approach to product warnings, these proposals are incompatible with many key characteristics of positive European product liability law as construed by the Court of Justice of the European Union. These scholars' recommendations invite us to reconsider some of the features of European product liability law and decide upon a direction for the future.
Keywords
European product liability law, defect, warnings, product information, causation, accident prevention

Downloads

  • 8638912.pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 410.24 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Verheyen, Thomas. “Modern Theories of Product Warnings and European Product Liability Law.” UTRECHT LAW REVIEW, vol. 15, no. 3, 2019, pp. 44–56.
APA
Verheyen, T. (2019). Modern theories of product warnings and European product liability law. UTRECHT LAW REVIEW, 15(3), 44–56.
Chicago author-date
Verheyen, Thomas. 2019. “Modern Theories of Product Warnings and European Product Liability Law.” UTRECHT LAW REVIEW 15 (3): 44–56.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Verheyen, Thomas. 2019. “Modern Theories of Product Warnings and European Product Liability Law.” UTRECHT LAW REVIEW 15 (3): 44–56.
Vancouver
1.
Verheyen T. Modern theories of product warnings and European product liability law. UTRECHT LAW REVIEW. 2019;15(3):44–56.
IEEE
[1]
T. Verheyen, “Modern theories of product warnings and European product liability law,” UTRECHT LAW REVIEW, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 44–56, 2019.
@article{8639486,
  abstract     = {Scholars inside and outside Europe have recently argued that product liability law should recognise the sheer complexity of designing an adequate warning. In the US, for instance, it has been suggested that a plaintiff bringing a claim based on a defective warning should be required to prove which reasonable alternative warning would have prevented her from suffering harm. While much can be said in favour of a more refined approach to product warnings, these proposals are incompatible with many key characteristics of positive European product liability law as construed by the Court of Justice of the European Union. These scholars' recommendations invite us to reconsider some of the features of European product liability law and decide upon a direction for the future.},
  author       = {Verheyen, Thomas},
  issn         = {1871-515X},
  journal      = {UTRECHT LAW REVIEW},
  keywords     = {European product liability law,defect,warnings,product information,causation,accident prevention},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {3},
  pages        = {44--56},
  title        = {Modern theories of product warnings and European product liability law},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.36633/ulr.541},
  volume       = {15},
  year         = {2019},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric