Advanced search
2 files | 4.76 MB Add to list

The effect of global signal regression on DCM estimates of noise and effective connectivity from resting state fMRI

(2020) NEUROIMAGE. 208.
Author
Organization
Abstract
The influence of global BOLD fluctuations on resting state functional connectivity in fMRI data remains a topic of debate, with little consensus. In this study, we assessed the effects of global signal regression (GSR) on effective connectivity within and between resting state networks (RSNs) - as estimated with dynamic causal modelling (DCM) for resting state fMRI (rsfMRI). DCM incorporates a forward (generative) model that quantifies the contribution of different types of noise (including global measurement noise), effective connectivity, and (neuro)vascular processes to functional connectivity measurements. DCM analyses were applied to two different designs; namely, longitudinal and cross-sectional designs. In the modelling of longitudinal designs, we considered four extensive longitudinal resting state fMRI datasets with a total number of 20 subjects. In the analysis of cross-sectional designs, we used rsfMRI data from 361 subjects from the Human Connectome Project. We hypothesized that (1) GSR would have no discernible impact on effective connectivity estimated with DCM, and (2) GSR would be reflected in the parameters representing global measurement noise. Additionally, we performed comparative analyses of information gain with and without GSR. Our results showed negligible to small effects of GSR on effective connectivity within small (separately estimated) RSNs. However, although the effect sizes were small, there was substantial to conclusive evidence for an effect of GSR on connectivity parameters. For between-network connectivity, we found two important effects: the effect of GSR on between-network effective connectivity (averaged over all connections) was negligible to small, while the effect of GSR on individual connections was non-negligible. In the cross-sectional (but not in the longitudinal) data, some connections showed substantial to conclusive evidence for an effect of GSR. Contrary to our expectations, we found either no effect (in the longitudinal designs) or a non-specific (cross-sectional design) effect of GSR on parameters characterising (global) measurement noise. Data without GSR were found to be more informative than data with GSR; however, in small resting state networks the precision of posterior estimates was greater after GSR. In conclusion, GSR is a minor concern in DCM studies; however, quantitative interpretation of between-network connections (as opposed to average between-network connectivity) and noise parameters should be treated with some caution. The Kullback-Leibler divergence of the posterior from the prior (i.e., information gain) - together with the precision of posterior estimates - might offer a useful measure to assess the appropriateness of GSR in resting state fMRI.
Keywords
Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, dynamic causal model, brain connectivity, computational neuroscience

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text (Accepted manuscript)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 1.40 MB
  • 1-s2.0-S1053811919310262-main.pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 3.36 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Almgren, Hannes, et al. “The Effect of Global Signal Regression on DCM Estimates of Noise and Effective Connectivity from Resting State FMRI.” NEUROIMAGE, vol. 208, 2020.
APA
Almgren, H., Van de Steen, F., Razi, A., Friston, K., & Marinazzo, D. (2020). The effect of global signal regression on DCM estimates of noise and effective connectivity from resting state fMRI. NEUROIMAGE, 208.
Chicago author-date
Almgren, Hannes, Frederik Van de Steen, Adeel Razi, Karl Friston, and Daniele Marinazzo. 2020. “The Effect of Global Signal Regression on DCM Estimates of Noise and Effective Connectivity from Resting State FMRI.” NEUROIMAGE 208.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Almgren, Hannes, Frederik Van de Steen, Adeel Razi, Karl Friston, and Daniele Marinazzo. 2020. “The Effect of Global Signal Regression on DCM Estimates of Noise and Effective Connectivity from Resting State FMRI.” NEUROIMAGE 208.
Vancouver
1.
Almgren H, Van de Steen F, Razi A, Friston K, Marinazzo D. The effect of global signal regression on DCM estimates of noise and effective connectivity from resting state fMRI. NEUROIMAGE. 2020;208.
IEEE
[1]
H. Almgren, F. Van de Steen, A. Razi, K. Friston, and D. Marinazzo, “The effect of global signal regression on DCM estimates of noise and effective connectivity from resting state fMRI,” NEUROIMAGE, vol. 208, 2020.
@article{8638336,
  abstract     = {The influence of global BOLD fluctuations on resting state functional connectivity in fMRI data remains a topic of debate, with little consensus. In this study, we assessed the effects of global signal regression (GSR) on effective connectivity within and between resting state networks (RSNs) - as estimated with dynamic causal modelling (DCM) for resting state fMRI (rsfMRI). DCM incorporates a forward (generative) model that quantifies the contribution of different types of noise (including global measurement noise), effective connectivity, and (neuro)vascular processes to functional connectivity measurements. DCM analyses were applied to two different designs; namely, longitudinal and cross-sectional designs. In the modelling of longitudinal designs, we considered four extensive longitudinal resting state fMRI datasets with a total number of 20 subjects. In the analysis of cross-sectional designs, we used rsfMRI data from 361 subjects from the Human Connectome Project. We hypothesized that (1) GSR would have no discernible impact on effective connectivity estimated with DCM, and (2) GSR would be reflected in the parameters representing global measurement noise. Additionally, we performed comparative analyses of information gain with and without GSR. Our results showed negligible to small effects of GSR on effective connectivity within small (separately estimated) RSNs. However, although the effect sizes were small, there was substantial to conclusive evidence for an effect of GSR on connectivity parameters. For between-network connectivity, we found two important effects: the effect of GSR on between-network effective connectivity (averaged over all connections) was negligible to small, while the effect of GSR on individual connections was non-negligible. In the cross-sectional (but not in the longitudinal) data, some connections showed substantial to conclusive evidence for an effect of GSR. Contrary to our expectations, we found either no effect (in the longitudinal designs) or a non-specific (cross-sectional design) effect of GSR on parameters characterising (global) measurement noise. Data without GSR were found to be more informative than data with GSR; however, in small resting state networks the precision of posterior estimates was greater after GSR. In conclusion, GSR is a minor concern in DCM studies; however, quantitative interpretation of between-network connections (as opposed to average between-network connectivity) and noise parameters should be treated with some caution. The Kullback-Leibler divergence of the posterior from the prior (i.e., information gain) - together with the precision of posterior estimates - might offer a useful measure to assess the appropriateness of GSR in resting state fMRI.},
  articleno    = {116435},
  author       = {Almgren, Hannes and Van de Steen, Frederik and Razi, Adeel and Friston, Karl and Marinazzo, Daniele},
  issn         = {1053-8119},
  journal      = {NEUROIMAGE},
  keywords     = {Cognitive Neuroscience,Neurology,dynamic causal model,brain connectivity,computational neuroscience},
  language     = {eng},
  title        = {The effect of global signal regression on DCM estimates of noise and effective connectivity from resting state fMRI},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116435},
  volume       = {208},
  year         = {2020},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric