![](https://biblio.ugent.be/static/images/publication-blank.png)
Paradigmatic possibilities as perspective for absolute constructions exploring linguistic differences and similarities of the Greek genitive and Latin ablative absolute
- Author
- Mike Kruijer and Ezra la Roi (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- Compared to Greek genitive absolutes, Latin ablative absolutes are of two types. The first have agents that are non-coreferential with the subject of the main clause. The second have agents that <jats:italic>are</jats:italic> coreferential with the subject of the main clause. The first type strongly resemble Greek genitive absolutes because of their high frequency of animate subject complements and the similar way in which they articulate referential coherence. The second type, which always contains a perfect passive participle, from a comparative perspective can be seen as a paradigmatic filler, which is a Latin alternative to an anterior active participle. Their subject complements are less frequently animate and in the word order (iconically) placed close to the subject of the main clause that is also the agent of the ablative absolute. However, paradigmatic differences have only minor consequences for the preferred sentence position of the absolute constructions and their internal complexity.
- Keywords
- Classics, Linguistics and Language, Archaeology, Literature and Literary Theory, History, Language and Linguistics, Greek and Latin linguistics, discourse pragmatics, referential coherence, iconicity, genitive absolute, ablative absolute, ANCIENT-GREEK, WORD-ORDER
Downloads
-
Kruijer la Roi genitive and ablative absolute accepted version.docx
- full text (Accepted manuscript)
- |
- open access
- |
- Word
- |
- 57.54 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8631348
- MLA
- Kruijer, Mike, and Ezra la Roi. “Paradigmatic Possibilities as Perspective for Absolute Constructions Exploring Linguistic Differences and Similarities of the Greek Genitive and Latin Ablative Absolute.” MNEMOSYNE, vol. 71, no. 5, 2018, pp. 799–822, doi:10.1163/1568525x-12342429.
- APA
- Kruijer, M., & la Roi, E. (2018). Paradigmatic possibilities as perspective for absolute constructions exploring linguistic differences and similarities of the Greek genitive and Latin ablative absolute. MNEMOSYNE, 71(5), 799–822. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568525x-12342429
- Chicago author-date
- Kruijer, Mike, and Ezra la Roi. 2018. “Paradigmatic Possibilities as Perspective for Absolute Constructions Exploring Linguistic Differences and Similarities of the Greek Genitive and Latin Ablative Absolute.” MNEMOSYNE 71 (5): 799–822. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568525x-12342429.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Kruijer, Mike, and Ezra la Roi. 2018. “Paradigmatic Possibilities as Perspective for Absolute Constructions Exploring Linguistic Differences and Similarities of the Greek Genitive and Latin Ablative Absolute.” MNEMOSYNE 71 (5): 799–822. doi:10.1163/1568525x-12342429.
- Vancouver
- 1.Kruijer M, la Roi E. Paradigmatic possibilities as perspective for absolute constructions exploring linguistic differences and similarities of the Greek genitive and Latin ablative absolute. MNEMOSYNE. 2018;71(5):799–822.
- IEEE
- [1]M. Kruijer and E. la Roi, “Paradigmatic possibilities as perspective for absolute constructions exploring linguistic differences and similarities of the Greek genitive and Latin ablative absolute,” MNEMOSYNE, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 799–822, 2018.
@article{8631348, abstract = {{Compared to Greek genitive absolutes, Latin ablative absolutes are of two types. The first have agents that are non-coreferential with the subject of the main clause. The second have agents that <jats:italic>are</jats:italic> coreferential with the subject of the main clause. The first type strongly resemble Greek genitive absolutes because of their high frequency of animate subject complements and the similar way in which they articulate referential coherence. The second type, which always contains a perfect passive participle, from a comparative perspective can be seen as a paradigmatic filler, which is a Latin alternative to an anterior active participle. Their subject complements are less frequently animate and in the word order (iconically) placed close to the subject of the main clause that is also the agent of the ablative absolute. However, paradigmatic differences have only minor consequences for the preferred sentence position of the absolute constructions and their internal complexity.}}, author = {{Kruijer, Mike and la Roi, Ezra}}, issn = {{0026-7074}}, journal = {{MNEMOSYNE}}, keywords = {{Classics,Linguistics and Language,Archaeology,Literature and Literary Theory,History,Language and Linguistics,Greek and Latin linguistics,discourse pragmatics,referential coherence,iconicity,genitive absolute,ablative absolute,ANCIENT-GREEK,WORD-ORDER}}, language = {{und}}, number = {{5}}, pages = {{799--822}}, title = {{Paradigmatic possibilities as perspective for absolute constructions exploring linguistic differences and similarities of the Greek genitive and Latin ablative absolute}}, url = {{http://doi.org/10.1163/1568525x-12342429}}, volume = {{71}}, year = {{2018}}, }
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: