Advanced search
1 file | 407.43 KB Add to list

Training progression in recreational cyclists : no linear dose-response relationship with training load

Kobe Vermeire (UGent) , Gilles Vandewiele (UGent) , Kevin Caen (UGent) , Maarten Lievens (UGent) , Jan Bourgois (UGent) and Jan Boone (UGent)
Author
Organization
Project
Abstract
Vermeire, KM, Vandewiele, G, Caen, K, Lievens, M, Bourgois, JG, and Boone, J. Training progression in recreational cyclists: no linear dose-response relationship with training load. J Strength Cond Res 35(12): 3500-3505, 2021-The purpose of the study was to assess the relationship between training load (TL) and performance improvement in a homogeneous group of recreational cyclists, training with a self-oriented training plan. Training data from 11 recreational cyclists were collected over a 12-week period. Before and after the training period, subjects underwent a laboratory incremental exercise test with blood lactate measurements to determine the power output associated with the aerobic threshold (P-AT) and the anaerobic threshold (P-ANT), and the maximal power output (P-MAX) was also determined. Mean weekly TL (calculated using the training impulse (TRIMP) of Banister, Edwards TRIMP, Lucia TRIMP and the individualized TRIMP) were correlated to the progression in fitness parameters using Pearson Correlation. Training intensity distribution (TID) was also determined (% in zone 1 as ANT). No significant correlations between mean weekly TRIMP values and the improvement on P-MAX (r = -0.22 to 0.08), P-ANT (r = -0.56 to -0.31) and P-AT (r = -0.08 to 0.41) were found. The TID was significant in a multiple regression with P-ANT as dependent variable (y = 0.0088 + 0.1094 x Z1 - 0.2704 x Z2 + 1.0416 x Z3; p = 0.02; R-2 = 0.62). In conclusion, this study shows that the commonly used TRIMP methods to quantify TL do not show a linear dose-response relationship with performance improvement in recreational cyclists. Furthermore, the study shows that TID might be a key factor to establish a relationship with performance improvement.
Keywords
TRIMP, endurance training, training quantification, cycling, INTENSITY DISTRIBUTION, AEROBIC-FITNESS, PERFORMANCE

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 407.43 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Vermeire, Kobe, et al. “Training Progression in Recreational Cyclists : No Linear Dose-Response Relationship with Training Load.” JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, vol. 35, no. 12, 2021, pp. 3500–05, doi:10.1519/jsc.0000000000003340.
APA
Vermeire, K., Vandewiele, G., Caen, K., Lievens, M., Bourgois, J., & Boone, J. (2021). Training progression in recreational cyclists : no linear dose-response relationship with training load. JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 35(12), 3500–3505. https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000003340
Chicago author-date
Vermeire, Kobe, Gilles Vandewiele, Kevin Caen, Maarten Lievens, Jan Bourgois, and Jan Boone. 2021. “Training Progression in Recreational Cyclists : No Linear Dose-Response Relationship with Training Load.” JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH 35 (12): 3500–3505. https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000003340.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Vermeire, Kobe, Gilles Vandewiele, Kevin Caen, Maarten Lievens, Jan Bourgois, and Jan Boone. 2021. “Training Progression in Recreational Cyclists : No Linear Dose-Response Relationship with Training Load.” JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH 35 (12): 3500–3505. doi:10.1519/jsc.0000000000003340.
Vancouver
1.
Vermeire K, Vandewiele G, Caen K, Lievens M, Bourgois J, Boone J. Training progression in recreational cyclists : no linear dose-response relationship with training load. JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH. 2021;35(12):3500–5.
IEEE
[1]
K. Vermeire, G. Vandewiele, K. Caen, M. Lievens, J. Bourgois, and J. Boone, “Training progression in recreational cyclists : no linear dose-response relationship with training load,” JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 3500–3505, 2021.
@article{8628805,
  abstract     = {{Vermeire, KM, Vandewiele, G, Caen, K, Lievens, M, Bourgois, JG, and Boone, J. Training progression in recreational cyclists: no linear dose-response relationship with training load. J Strength Cond Res 35(12): 3500-3505, 2021-The purpose of the study was to assess the relationship between training load (TL) and performance improvement in a homogeneous group of recreational cyclists, training with a self-oriented training plan. Training data from 11 recreational cyclists were collected over a 12-week period. Before and after the training period, subjects underwent a laboratory incremental exercise test with blood lactate measurements to determine the power output associated with the aerobic threshold (P-AT) and the anaerobic threshold (P-ANT), and the maximal power output (P-MAX) was also determined. Mean weekly TL (calculated using the training impulse (TRIMP) of Banister, Edwards TRIMP, Lucia TRIMP and the individualized TRIMP) were correlated to the progression in fitness parameters using Pearson Correlation. Training intensity distribution (TID) was also determined (% in zone 1 as ANT). No significant correlations between mean weekly TRIMP values and the improvement on P-MAX (r = -0.22 to 0.08), P-ANT (r = -0.56 to -0.31) and P-AT (r = -0.08 to 0.41) were found. The TID was significant in a multiple regression with P-ANT as dependent variable (y = 0.0088 + 0.1094 x Z1 - 0.2704 x Z2 + 1.0416 x Z3; p = 0.02; R-2 = 0.62). In conclusion, this study shows that the commonly used TRIMP methods to quantify TL do not show a linear dose-response relationship with performance improvement in recreational cyclists. Furthermore, the study shows that TID might be a key factor to establish a relationship with performance improvement.}},
  author       = {{Vermeire, Kobe and Vandewiele, Gilles and Caen, Kevin and Lievens, Maarten and Bourgois, Jan and Boone, Jan}},
  issn         = {{1064-8011}},
  journal      = {{JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH}},
  keywords     = {{TRIMP,endurance training,training quantification,cycling,INTENSITY DISTRIBUTION,AEROBIC-FITNESS,PERFORMANCE}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{12}},
  pages        = {{3500--3505}},
  title        = {{Training progression in recreational cyclists : no linear dose-response relationship with training load}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000003340}},
  volume       = {{35}},
  year         = {{2021}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: