Advanced search
1 file | 356.46 KB Add to list

The impact of readability of corporate social responsibility information on credibility as perceived by generalist versus specialist readers

Author
Organization
Abstract
Purpose - This paper aims to study the impact of readability of corporate social responsibility (CSR) information on its credibility as perceived by generalist versus specialist readers. It is hypothesized that the readability-credibility effect will be contingent on reader specialization. Design/methodology/approach - To test the hypothesis, a quasi-experiment with a 2 (readability) x 2 (reader specialization) design was conducted. Findings - Overall, the results lead to the conclusion that using plain language in CSR disclosures may be beneficial for their credibility as perceived by generalist readers thanks to their higher perceived truthfulness (one specific sub-dimension of credibility). Specialist readers' perceived credibility, on the other hand, is not influenced by the enhanced readability resulting from plain language. Research limitations/implications - Student participants were used. The results may not be generalizable to practitioners with different levels of exposure to, familiarity with, and understanding of CSR disclosures. Practical implications - Given the lack of credibility of CSR disclosures, insight into perceived credibility antecedents is important. This study may be considered as a first step toward informing reporting standards regarding the inclusion of more detailed guidance on how corporations should formulate their CSR information to increase its perceived credibility. Originality/value - The results suggest that enhanced readability may improve the potential of CSR reports as legitimacy tools for generalist readers. The direct examination of readers complements prior studies on CSR reporting quality and the language used in CSR disclosures.
Keywords
Credibility, CSR information, Generalist readers, Plain language, Specialist readers, ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE, DISCLOSURES, ASSURANCE, PERCEPTIONS, COMPLEXITY

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 356.46 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Hoozée, Sophie, et al. “The Impact of Readability of Corporate Social Responsibility Information on Credibility as Perceived by Generalist versus Specialist Readers.” SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENT AND POLICY JOURNAL, vol. 10, no. 3, 2019, pp. 570–91.
APA
Hoozée, S., Maussen, S., & Vangronsveld, P. (2019). The impact of readability of corporate social responsibility information on credibility as perceived by generalist versus specialist readers. SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENT AND POLICY JOURNAL, 10(3), 570–591.
Chicago author-date
Hoozée, Sophie, Sophie Maussen, and Perry Vangronsveld. 2019. “The Impact of Readability of Corporate Social Responsibility Information on Credibility as Perceived by Generalist versus Specialist Readers.” SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENT AND POLICY JOURNAL 10 (3): 570–91.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Hoozée, Sophie, Sophie Maussen, and Perry Vangronsveld. 2019. “The Impact of Readability of Corporate Social Responsibility Information on Credibility as Perceived by Generalist versus Specialist Readers.” SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENT AND POLICY JOURNAL 10 (3): 570–591.
Vancouver
1.
Hoozée S, Maussen S, Vangronsveld P. The impact of readability of corporate social responsibility information on credibility as perceived by generalist versus specialist readers. SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENT AND POLICY JOURNAL. 2019;10(3):570–91.
IEEE
[1]
S. Hoozée, S. Maussen, and P. Vangronsveld, “The impact of readability of corporate social responsibility information on credibility as perceived by generalist versus specialist readers,” SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENT AND POLICY JOURNAL, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 570–591, 2019.
@article{8624994,
  abstract     = {Purpose - This paper aims to study the impact of readability of corporate social responsibility (CSR) information on its credibility as perceived by generalist versus specialist readers. It is hypothesized that the readability-credibility effect will be contingent on reader specialization.
Design/methodology/approach - To test the hypothesis, a quasi-experiment with a 2 (readability) x 2 (reader specialization) design was conducted.
Findings - Overall, the results lead to the conclusion that using plain language in CSR disclosures may be beneficial for their credibility as perceived by generalist readers thanks to their higher perceived truthfulness (one specific sub-dimension of credibility). Specialist readers' perceived credibility, on the other hand, is not influenced by the enhanced readability resulting from plain language.
Research limitations/implications - Student participants were used. The results may not be generalizable to practitioners with different levels of exposure to, familiarity with, and understanding of CSR disclosures.
Practical implications - Given the lack of credibility of CSR disclosures, insight into perceived credibility antecedents is important. This study may be considered as a first step toward informing reporting standards regarding the inclusion of more detailed guidance on how corporations should formulate their CSR information to increase its perceived credibility.
Originality/value - The results suggest that enhanced readability may improve the potential of CSR reports as legitimacy tools for generalist readers. The direct examination of readers complements prior studies on CSR reporting quality and the language used in CSR disclosures.},
  author       = {Hoozée, Sophie and Maussen, Sophie and Vangronsveld, Perry},
  issn         = {2040-8021},
  journal      = {SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENT AND POLICY JOURNAL},
  keywords     = {Credibility,CSR information,Generalist readers,Plain language,Specialist readers,ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE,DISCLOSURES,ASSURANCE,PERCEPTIONS,COMPLEXITY},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {3},
  pages        = {570--591},
  title        = {The impact of readability of corporate social responsibility information on credibility as perceived by generalist versus specialist readers},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/sampj-03-2018-0056},
  volume       = {10},
  year         = {2019},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: