Advanced search
1 file | 480.13 KB Add to list

Pragmatism should not be a substitute for statistical literacy, a commentary on Albers, Kiers, and Van Ravenzwaaij (2018)

Author
Organization
Abstract
Based on the observation that frequentist confidence intervals and Bayesian credible intervals sometimes happen to have the same numerical boundaries (under very specific conditions), Albers et al. (2018) proposed to adopt the heuristic according to which they can usually be treated as equivalent. We argue that this heuristic can be misleading by showing that it does not generalise well to more complex (realistic) situations and models. Instead of pragmatism, we advocate for the use of parsimony in deciding which statistics to report. In a word, we recommend that a researcher interested in the Bayesian interpretation simply reports credible intervals.
Keywords
VALUES, Bayesian statistics, Bayes, confidence interval, credible interval

Downloads

  • 197-2975-1-PB.pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 480.13 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Nalborczyk, Ladislas, Paul-Christian Buerkner, and Donald R. Williams. “Pragmatism Should Not Be a Substitute for Statistical Literacy, a Commentary on Albers, Kiers, and Van Ravenzwaaij (2018).” COLLABRA-PSYCHOLOGY 5.1 (2019): n. pag. Print.
APA
Nalborczyk, L., Buerkner, P.-C., & Williams, D. R. (2019). Pragmatism should not be a substitute for statistical literacy, a commentary on Albers, Kiers, and Van Ravenzwaaij (2018). COLLABRA-PSYCHOLOGY, 5(1).
Chicago author-date
Nalborczyk, Ladislas, Paul-Christian Buerkner, and Donald R. Williams. 2019. “Pragmatism Should Not Be a Substitute for Statistical Literacy, a Commentary on Albers, Kiers, and Van Ravenzwaaij (2018).” Collabra-psychology 5 (1).
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Nalborczyk, Ladislas, Paul-Christian Buerkner, and Donald R. Williams. 2019. “Pragmatism Should Not Be a Substitute for Statistical Literacy, a Commentary on Albers, Kiers, and Van Ravenzwaaij (2018).” Collabra-psychology 5 (1).
Vancouver
1.
Nalborczyk L, Buerkner P-C, Williams DR. Pragmatism should not be a substitute for statistical literacy, a commentary on Albers, Kiers, and Van Ravenzwaaij (2018). COLLABRA-PSYCHOLOGY. Oakland: Univ California Press; 2019;5(1).
IEEE
[1]
L. Nalborczyk, P.-C. Buerkner, and D. R. Williams, “Pragmatism should not be a substitute for statistical literacy, a commentary on Albers, Kiers, and Van Ravenzwaaij (2018),” COLLABRA-PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 5, no. 1, 2019.
@article{8624554,
  abstract     = {Based on the observation that frequentist confidence intervals and Bayesian credible intervals sometimes happen to have the same numerical boundaries (under very specific conditions), Albers et al. (2018) proposed to adopt the heuristic according to which they can usually be treated as equivalent. We argue that this heuristic can be misleading by showing that it does not generalise well to more complex (realistic) situations and models. Instead of pragmatism, we advocate for the use of parsimony in deciding which statistics to report. In a word, we recommend that a researcher interested in the Bayesian interpretation simply reports credible intervals.},
  articleno    = {13},
  author       = {Nalborczyk, Ladislas and Buerkner, Paul-Christian and Williams, Donald R.},
  issn         = {2474-7394},
  journal      = {COLLABRA-PSYCHOLOGY},
  keywords     = {VALUES,Bayesian statistics,Bayes,confidence interval,credible interval},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {1},
  pages        = {5},
  publisher    = {Univ California Press},
  title        = {Pragmatism should not be a substitute for statistical literacy, a commentary on Albers, Kiers, and Van Ravenzwaaij (2018)},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/collabra.197},
  volume       = {5},
  year         = {2019},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: