- Author
- Marianne Maeckelbergh (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- Introduction When I began my anthropological research into social movement organizing, I had already been involved in social movements for over ten years. When I started to delve into the literature on social movements, how they work, why they work that way, and what they actually are, I must admit, I was disappointed. I felt very strongly that there was something missing. Although there were many interesting theories about how social movements work and why, none of these theories seemed to capture what was most interesting to me – the perspectives of the social movement actors themselves. As someone who had experienced firsthand what it was like to watch the entire realm of human possibility seem to transform as a result of an exciting and dynamic interaction between hundreds or thousands of inspiring, passionate, committed people who were willing to take considerable risks in the fight for their own freedom or the freedom of others, I could not help but feel that the literature left a great deal unsaid about what it means to struggle for social change.
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8624254
- MLA
- Maeckelbergh, Marianne. “Social Movements as Process.” The Routledge Companion to Contemporary Anthropology, edited by Simon Coleman et al., Routledge, 2017, pp. 456–74, doi:10.4324/9781315743950-34.
- APA
- Maeckelbergh, M. (2017). Social movements as process. In S. Coleman, S. Hyatt, & A. Kingsolver (Eds.), The Routledge companion to contemporary anthropology (pp. 456–474). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315743950-34
- Chicago author-date
- Maeckelbergh, Marianne. 2017. “Social Movements as Process.” In The Routledge Companion to Contemporary Anthropology, edited by Simon Coleman, Susan Hyatt, and Ann Kingsolver, 456–74. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315743950-34.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Maeckelbergh, Marianne. 2017. “Social Movements as Process.” In The Routledge Companion to Contemporary Anthropology, ed by. Simon Coleman, Susan Hyatt, and Ann Kingsolver, 456–474. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315743950-34.
- Vancouver
- 1.Maeckelbergh M. Social movements as process. In: Coleman S, Hyatt S, Kingsolver A, editors. The Routledge companion to contemporary anthropology. Routledge; 2017. p. 456–74.
- IEEE
- [1]M. Maeckelbergh, “Social movements as process,” in The Routledge companion to contemporary anthropology, S. Coleman, S. Hyatt, and A. Kingsolver, Eds. Routledge, 2017, pp. 456–474.
@incollection{8624254,
abstract = {{Introduction When I began my anthropological research into social movement organizing, I had already been involved in social movements for over ten years. When I started to delve into the literature on social movements, how they work, why they work that way, and what they actually are, I must admit, I was disappointed. I felt very strongly that there was something missing. Although there were many interesting theories about how social movements work and why, none of these theories seemed to capture what was most interesting to me – the perspectives of the social movement actors themselves. As someone who had experienced firsthand what it was like to watch the entire realm of human possibility seem to transform as a result of an exciting and dynamic interaction between hundreds or thousands of inspiring, passionate, committed people who were willing to take considerable risks in the fight for their own freedom or the freedom of others, I could not help but feel that the literature left a great deal unsaid about what it means to struggle for social change.}},
author = {{Maeckelbergh, Marianne}},
booktitle = {{The Routledge companion to contemporary anthropology}},
editor = {{Coleman, Simon and Hyatt, Susan and Kingsolver, Ann}},
isbn = {{9780415583954}},
language = {{eng}},
pages = {{456--474}},
publisher = {{Routledge}},
title = {{Social movements as process}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315743950-34}},
year = {{2017}},
}
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric