Does explaining social behavior require multiple memory systems?
- Author
- Pieter Van Dessel (UGent) , Bertram Gawronski and Jan De Houwer (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- Amodio [1] argues that social cognition research has for many decades relied on imprecise dual-process models that build on questionable assumptions about how people learn and represent information. He presents an alternative framework for explaining social behavior as the product of multiple dissociable memory systems, based on the idea that cognitive neuroscience has revealed evidence for the existence of separate systems underlying distinct forms of learning and memory.
- Keywords
- IMPLICIT, MODEL
Downloads
-
Van Dessel Gawronski et al Tics Letter.pdf
- full text
- |
- open access
- |
- |
- 24.84 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8623475
- MLA
- Van Dessel, Pieter, et al. “Does Explaining Social Behavior Require Multiple Memory Systems?” TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, vol. 23, no. 5, Elsevier Science London, 2019, pp. 368–69, doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.001.
- APA
- Van Dessel, P., Gawronski, B., & De Houwer, J. (2019). Does explaining social behavior require multiple memory systems? TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 23(5), 368–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.001
- Chicago author-date
- Van Dessel, Pieter, Bertram Gawronski, and Jan De Houwer. 2019. “Does Explaining Social Behavior Require Multiple Memory Systems?” TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES 23 (5): 368–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.001.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Van Dessel, Pieter, Bertram Gawronski, and Jan De Houwer. 2019. “Does Explaining Social Behavior Require Multiple Memory Systems?” TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES 23 (5): 368–369. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.001.
- Vancouver
- 1.Van Dessel P, Gawronski B, De Houwer J. Does explaining social behavior require multiple memory systems? TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES. 2019;23(5):368–9.
- IEEE
- [1]P. Van Dessel, B. Gawronski, and J. De Houwer, “Does explaining social behavior require multiple memory systems?,” TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 368–369, 2019.
@article{8623475,
abstract = {{Amodio [1] argues that social cognition research has for many decades relied on imprecise dual-process models that build on questionable assumptions about how people learn and represent information. He presents an alternative framework for explaining social behavior as the product of multiple dissociable memory systems, based on the idea that cognitive neuroscience has revealed evidence for the existence of separate systems underlying distinct forms of learning and memory.}},
author = {{Van Dessel, Pieter and Gawronski, Bertram and De Houwer, Jan}},
issn = {{1364-6613}},
journal = {{TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES}},
keywords = {{IMPLICIT,MODEL}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{5}},
pages = {{368--369}},
publisher = {{Elsevier Science London}},
title = {{Does explaining social behavior require multiple memory systems?}},
url = {{http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.02.001}},
volume = {{23}},
year = {{2019}},
}
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: