Advanced search
2 files | 585.79 KB Add to list

Putting multidisciplinarity (back) on the map

Julie Mennes (UGent)
Author
Organization
Abstract
The dominant theory of cross-disciplinarity represents multidisciplinarity as 'lower' or 'less interesting' than interdisciplinarity. In this paper, it is argued that this unfavorable representation of multidisciplinarity is ungrounded because it is an effect of the theory being incomplete. It is also explained that the unfavorable, ungrounded representation of multidisciplinarity is problematic: when someone adopts the dominant theory of cross-disciplinarity, the unfavorable representation supports the development of a preference for interdisciplinarity over multidisciplinarity. However, being ungrounded, the support the representation provides for a preference for interdisciplinarity, is invalid. The issue is even more pressing because research policy makers and funding bodies are among the adopters of the theory, which means that there is a risk of (funding) policies reflecting an unjustified preference for interdisciplinarity over multidisciplinarity. This paper presents an improved version of the dominant theory of cross-disciplinarity, obtained by completing the original version with the information it was missing. Because the improved version is more neutral regarding the value of different types of cross-disciplinarity, it is better suited for use by research policy makers and funding bodies.
Keywords
Cross-disciplinarity, Interdisciplinarity, Multidisciplinarity, Research policy making, Research funding, INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH, INTEGRATION, SYSTEMS, SCIENCE, EPISTEMOLOGY, REFLECTIONS, BOUNDARIES, MODES

Downloads

  • (...).docx
    • full text (Accepted manuscript)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • Word
    • |
    • 102.51 KB
  • (...).pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 483.28 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Mennes, Julie. “Putting Multidisciplinarity (Back) on the Map.” EUROPEAN JOURNAL FOR PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, vol. 10, no. 2, 2020.
APA
Mennes, J. (2020). Putting multidisciplinarity (back) on the map. EUROPEAN JOURNAL FOR PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 10(2).
Chicago author-date
Mennes, Julie. 2020. “Putting Multidisciplinarity (Back) on the Map.” EUROPEAN JOURNAL FOR PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE 10 (2).
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Mennes, Julie. 2020. “Putting Multidisciplinarity (Back) on the Map.” EUROPEAN JOURNAL FOR PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE 10 (2).
Vancouver
1.
Mennes J. Putting multidisciplinarity (back) on the map. EUROPEAN JOURNAL FOR PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE. 2020;10(2).
IEEE
[1]
J. Mennes, “Putting multidisciplinarity (back) on the map,” EUROPEAN JOURNAL FOR PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, vol. 10, no. 2, 2020.
@article{8619578,
  abstract     = {The dominant theory of cross-disciplinarity represents multidisciplinarity as 'lower' or 'less interesting' than interdisciplinarity. In this paper, it is argued that this unfavorable representation of multidisciplinarity is ungrounded because it is an effect of the theory being incomplete. It is also explained that the unfavorable, ungrounded representation of multidisciplinarity is problematic: when someone adopts the dominant theory of cross-disciplinarity, the unfavorable representation supports the development of a preference for interdisciplinarity over multidisciplinarity. However, being ungrounded, the support the representation provides for a preference for interdisciplinarity, is invalid. The issue is even more pressing because research policy makers and funding bodies are among the adopters of the theory, which means that there is a risk of (funding) policies reflecting an unjustified preference for interdisciplinarity over multidisciplinarity. This paper presents an improved version of the dominant theory of cross-disciplinarity, obtained by completing the original version with the information it was missing. Because the improved version is more neutral regarding the value of different types of cross-disciplinarity, it is better suited for use by research policy makers and funding bodies.},
  articleno    = {18},
  author       = {Mennes, Julie},
  issn         = {1879-4912},
  journal      = {EUROPEAN JOURNAL FOR PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE},
  keywords     = {Cross-disciplinarity,Interdisciplinarity,Multidisciplinarity,Research policy making,Research funding,INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH,INTEGRATION,SYSTEMS,SCIENCE,EPISTEMOLOGY,REFLECTIONS,BOUNDARIES,MODES},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {2},
  pages        = {23},
  title        = {Putting multidisciplinarity (back) on the map},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13194-020-00283-z},
  volume       = {10},
  year         = {2020},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: