Advanced search
Add to list

Robust peptide-based models in quantitative proteomics

Author
Organization
Abstract
Peptide level models for assessing differential proteomics outperform summarization-based methods in terms of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and precision (Goeminne et al., 2015, submitted). However, the ordinary least squares (OLS) parameter estimator is prone to overfitting and suffers from missing peptides and outliers that are omnipresent in proteomics data. We propose a robust ridge estimator and adopt empirical Bayes to stabilize the variance. With the CPTAC spike-in study, we demonstrate that our robust peptide-based estimator further improves the sensitivity and specificity.
Keywords
statistics, biostatistics, data analysis, differential protein abundance, label-free quantification, differential proteomics, peptide-based linear model, robust ridge regression, M estimation, Huber weights, empirical Bayes variance estimation, tandem mass spectrometry, overfitting, outliers, missing values

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Goeminne, Ludger, et al. “Robust Peptide-Based Models in Quantitative Proteomics.” Proteomic Forum, Abstracts, 2015.
APA
Goeminne, L., Vandepoele, K., Gevaert, K., & Clement, L. (2015). Robust peptide-based models in quantitative proteomics. Proteomic Forum, Abstracts. Presented at the Proteomic Forum 2015, Berlin, Germany.
Chicago author-date
Goeminne, Ludger, Klaas Vandepoele, Kris Gevaert, and Lieven Clement. 2015. “Robust Peptide-Based Models in Quantitative Proteomics.” In Proteomic Forum, Abstracts.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Goeminne, Ludger, Klaas Vandepoele, Kris Gevaert, and Lieven Clement. 2015. “Robust Peptide-Based Models in Quantitative Proteomics.” In Proteomic Forum, Abstracts.
Vancouver
1.
Goeminne L, Vandepoele K, Gevaert K, Clement L. Robust peptide-based models in quantitative proteomics. In: Proteomic Forum, Abstracts. 2015.
IEEE
[1]
L. Goeminne, K. Vandepoele, K. Gevaert, and L. Clement, “Robust peptide-based models in quantitative proteomics,” in Proteomic Forum, Abstracts, Berlin, Germany, 2015.
@inproceedings{8616167,
  abstract     = {{Peptide level models for assessing differential proteomics outperform summarization-based methods in terms of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and precision (Goeminne et al., 2015, submitted). However, the ordinary least squares (OLS) parameter estimator is prone to overfitting and suffers from missing peptides and outliers that are omnipresent in proteomics data. We propose a robust ridge estimator and adopt empirical Bayes to stabilize the variance. With the CPTAC spike-in study, we demonstrate that our robust peptide-based estimator further improves the sensitivity and specificity.}},
  author       = {{Goeminne, Ludger and Vandepoele, Klaas and Gevaert, Kris and Clement, Lieven}},
  booktitle    = {{Proteomic Forum, Abstracts}},
  keywords     = {{statistics,biostatistics,data analysis,differential protein abundance,label-free quantification,differential proteomics,peptide-based linear model,robust ridge regression,M estimation,Huber weights,empirical Bayes variance estimation,tandem mass spectrometry,overfitting,outliers,missing values}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  location     = {{Berlin, Germany}},
  title        = {{Robust peptide-based models in quantitative proteomics}},
  year         = {{2015}},
}