Advanced search
1 file | 336.52 KB Add to list

Strategies to improve selection of creative ideas : an experimental test of epistemic and social motivation in groups

Author
Organization
Abstract
Pre-implementation activities like idea selection play a crucial role in the innovation process. However, groups of people seem to perform rather poorly when it comes to selecting creative ideas for implementation. The Motivated Information Processing in Groups model (MIP-G) provides an explanation as to why some groups outperform others when it comes to making group decisions. On the basis of the MIP-G framework, we hypothesized that groups that are both epistemically and prosocially motivated would outperform other groups in selecting creative ideas. Contrary to our hypothesis, a 2 x 2 experiment in a field sample (N = 240 or 80 three-person groups) showed that under conditions of high epistemic motivation, proself motivated groups selected significantly more creative and original ideas than prosocial groups. Proself motivated groups did not differ significantly from the prosocial motivated groups in selecting feasible ideas under conditions of high epistemic motivation. Our results suggest that the MIP-G framework may need refinement to increase our future understanding of group idea selection. To this end, we propose three specific avenues for future research.
Keywords
BRAINSTORMING RULES, GENERATION, TEAMS, IMPLEMENTATION, PRODUCTIVITY, PERFORMANCE, EXPERIENCE, INNOVATION, CONFLICT, MOTIVES

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 336.52 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Van Damme, Michaël et al. “Strategies to Improve Selection of Creative Ideas : an Experimental Test of Epistemic and Social Motivation in Groups.” CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT 28.1 (2019): 61–71. Print.
APA
Van Damme, M., Anseel, F., Duyck, W., & Rietzschel, E. F. (2019). Strategies to improve selection of creative ideas : an experimental test of epistemic and social motivation in groups. CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 28(1), 61–71.
Chicago author-date
Van Damme, Michaël, Frederik Anseel, Wouter Duyck, and Eric F. Rietzschel. 2019. “Strategies to Improve Selection of Creative Ideas : an Experimental Test of Epistemic and Social Motivation in Groups.” Creativity and Innovation Management 28 (1): 61–71.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Van Damme, Michaël, Frederik Anseel, Wouter Duyck, and Eric F. Rietzschel. 2019. “Strategies to Improve Selection of Creative Ideas : an Experimental Test of Epistemic and Social Motivation in Groups.” Creativity and Innovation Management 28 (1): 61–71.
Vancouver
1.
Van Damme M, Anseel F, Duyck W, Rietzschel EF. Strategies to improve selection of creative ideas : an experimental test of epistemic and social motivation in groups. CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT. Hoboken: Wiley; 2019;28(1):61–71.
IEEE
[1]
M. Van Damme, F. Anseel, W. Duyck, and E. F. Rietzschel, “Strategies to improve selection of creative ideas : an experimental test of epistemic and social motivation in groups,” CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 61–71, 2019.
@article{8606422,
  abstract     = {Pre-implementation activities like idea selection play a crucial role in the innovation process. However, groups of people seem to perform rather poorly when it comes to selecting creative ideas for implementation. The Motivated Information Processing in Groups model (MIP-G) provides an explanation as to why some groups outperform others when it comes to making group decisions. On the basis of the MIP-G framework, we hypothesized that groups that are both epistemically and prosocially motivated would outperform other groups in selecting creative ideas. Contrary to our hypothesis, a 2 x 2 experiment in a field sample (N = 240 or 80 three-person groups) showed that under conditions of high epistemic motivation, proself motivated groups selected significantly more creative and original ideas than prosocial groups. Proself motivated groups did not differ significantly from the prosocial motivated groups in selecting feasible ideas under conditions of high epistemic motivation. Our results suggest that the MIP-G framework may need refinement to increase our future understanding of group idea selection. To this end, we propose three specific avenues for future research.},
  author       = {Van Damme, Michaël and Anseel, Frederik and Duyck, Wouter and Rietzschel, Eric F.},
  issn         = {0963-1690},
  journal      = {CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT},
  keywords     = {BRAINSTORMING RULES,GENERATION,TEAMS,IMPLEMENTATION,PRODUCTIVITY,PERFORMANCE,EXPERIENCE,INNOVATION,CONFLICT,MOTIVES},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {1},
  pages        = {61--71},
  publisher    = {Wiley},
  title        = {Strategies to improve selection of creative ideas : an experimental test of epistemic and social motivation in groups},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/caim.12306},
  volume       = {28},
  year         = {2019},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: