Advanced search
2 files | 2.23 MB Add to list

Consistency influences altered auditory feedback processing

Author
Organization
Abstract
Previous research on the effect of perturbed auditory feedback in speech production has focused on two types of responses. In the short term, speakers generate compensatory motor commands in response to unexpected perturbations. In the longer term, speakers adapt feedforward motor programs in response to feedback perturbations, in order to avoid future errors. The current study investigated the relation between these two types of responses to altered auditory feedback. Specifically, it was hypothesized that consistency in previous feedback perturbations would influence whether speakers adapt their feedforward motor programs. In an altered auditory feedback paradigm, formant perturbations were applied either across all trials (the consistent condition) or only to some trials while the others remained unperturbed (the inconsistent condition). The results showed that speakers’ responses were affected by feedback consistency, with stronger speech changes in the consistent condition compared to the inconsistent condition. Current models of speech-motor control can explain this consistency effect. However, the data also suggest compensation and adaptation are distinct processes, which is not in line with all current models.
Keywords
Speech production, formants, speech-motor control, sensorimotor integration, SENSORIMOTOR ADAPTATION, RESPONSES, PITCH, COMPENSATION, FREQUENCY, ERROR

Downloads

  • Franken QJEP PostPrint.pdf
    • full text (Accepted manuscript)
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 1.71 MB
  • (...).pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 516.57 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Franken, Matthias, et al. “Consistency Influences Altered Auditory Feedback Processing.” QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 72, no. 10, 2019, pp. 2371–79.
APA
Franken, M., Acheson, D., McQueen, J., Hagoort, P., & Eisner, F. (2019). Consistency influences altered auditory feedback processing. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 72(10), 2371–2379.
Chicago author-date
Franken, Matthias, Daniel Acheson, James McQueen, Peter Hagoort, and Frank Eisner. 2019. “Consistency Influences Altered Auditory Feedback Processing.” QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY 72 (10): 2371–79.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Franken, Matthias, Daniel Acheson, James McQueen, Peter Hagoort, and Frank Eisner. 2019. “Consistency Influences Altered Auditory Feedback Processing.” QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY 72 (10): 2371–2379.
Vancouver
1.
Franken M, Acheson D, McQueen J, Hagoort P, Eisner F. Consistency influences altered auditory feedback processing. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY. 2019;72(10):2371–9.
IEEE
[1]
M. Franken, D. Acheson, J. McQueen, P. Hagoort, and F. Eisner, “Consistency influences altered auditory feedback processing,” QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 2371–2379, 2019.
@article{8605181,
  abstract     = {Previous research on the effect of perturbed auditory feedback in speech production has focused on two types of responses. In the short term, speakers generate compensatory motor commands in response to unexpected perturbations. In the longer term, speakers adapt feedforward motor programs in response to feedback perturbations, in order to avoid future errors. The current study investigated the relation between these two types of responses to altered auditory feedback. Specifically, it was hypothesized that consistency in previous feedback perturbations would influence whether speakers adapt their feedforward motor programs. In an altered auditory feedback paradigm, formant perturbations were applied either across all trials (the consistent condition) or only to some trials while the others remained unperturbed (the inconsistent condition). The results showed that speakers’ responses were affected by feedback consistency, with stronger speech changes in the consistent condition compared to the inconsistent condition. Current models of speech-motor control can explain this consistency effect. However, the data also suggest compensation and adaptation are distinct processes, which is not in line with all current models.},
  author       = {Franken, Matthias and Acheson, Daniel and McQueen, James and Hagoort, Peter and Eisner, Frank},
  issn         = {1747-0218},
  journal      = {QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY},
  keywords     = {Speech production,formants,speech-motor control,sensorimotor integration,SENSORIMOTOR ADAPTATION,RESPONSES,PITCH,COMPENSATION,FREQUENCY,ERROR},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {10},
  pages        = {2371--2379},
  title        = {Consistency influences altered auditory feedback processing},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1747021819838939},
  volume       = {72},
  year         = {2019},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: