Advanced search
1 file | 4.48 MB Add to list

When quantitative measures become a qualitative storybook : a phenomenological case analysis of validity and performativity of questionnaire administration in psychotherapy research

Author
Organization
Abstract
In psychotherapy research, treatment efficacy is commonly studied by means of self-report questionnaires to gain quantitative data on symptom development. The data serve as input for statistical analyses up to the level of evidence-based treatment. We analyzed how a patient in a psychotherapy study experienced the translation of her story into quantitative data by combining a phenomenological qualitative analysis of her therapeutic narrative and a visual analysis of her extensively annotated paper-andpencil questionnaires. Our findings provide a practical empirical illustration of the nature and impact of known validity issues. Beyond, we found the act of questionnaire administration affected the primary complaint such that it became performative toward the symptoms under study. We discuss the epistemic consequences for the validity of data, and we argue that valid data collection requires qualitative scrutiny of meaning within data and a concept of validity that allows for consideration of performativity of data collection.
Keywords
Psychology, Psychotherapy, Clinical Psychology, Philosophy of Science, Quantitative Research, Qualitative Research, Case study, interpretative phenomenological analysis, psychotherapy research, quantitative data, validity of data collection, validity and performativity, CONSTRUCT-VALIDATION, OBJECTIVITY, EXPERIENCE, THINKING, SCIENCE, NUMBERS, ART

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text (Published version)
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 4.48 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Truijens, Femke, et al. “When Quantitative Measures Become a Qualitative Storybook : A Phenomenological Case Analysis of Validity and Performativity of Questionnaire Administration in Psychotherapy Research.” QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 19, no. 1, 2022, pp. 244–87, doi:10.1080/14780887.2019.1579287.
APA
Truijens, F., Desmet, M., De Coster, E., Uyttenhove, H., Deeren, B., & Meganck, R. (2022). When quantitative measures become a qualitative storybook : a phenomenological case analysis of validity and performativity of questionnaire administration in psychotherapy research. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 19(1), 244–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2019.1579287
Chicago author-date
Truijens, Femke, Mattias Desmet, Eva De Coster, Horanka Uyttenhove, Bram Deeren, and Reitske Meganck. 2022. “When Quantitative Measures Become a Qualitative Storybook : A Phenomenological Case Analysis of Validity and Performativity of Questionnaire Administration in Psychotherapy Research.” QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY 19 (1): 244–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2019.1579287.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Truijens, Femke, Mattias Desmet, Eva De Coster, Horanka Uyttenhove, Bram Deeren, and Reitske Meganck. 2022. “When Quantitative Measures Become a Qualitative Storybook : A Phenomenological Case Analysis of Validity and Performativity of Questionnaire Administration in Psychotherapy Research.” QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY 19 (1): 244–287. doi:10.1080/14780887.2019.1579287.
Vancouver
1.
Truijens F, Desmet M, De Coster E, Uyttenhove H, Deeren B, Meganck R. When quantitative measures become a qualitative storybook : a phenomenological case analysis of validity and performativity of questionnaire administration in psychotherapy research. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY. 2022;19(1):244–87.
IEEE
[1]
F. Truijens, M. Desmet, E. De Coster, H. Uyttenhove, B. Deeren, and R. Meganck, “When quantitative measures become a qualitative storybook : a phenomenological case analysis of validity and performativity of questionnaire administration in psychotherapy research,” QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 244–287, 2022.
@article{8604065,
  abstract     = {{In psychotherapy research, treatment efficacy is commonly studied by means of self-report questionnaires to gain quantitative data on symptom development. The data serve as input for statistical analyses up to the level of evidence-based treatment. We analyzed how a patient in a psychotherapy study experienced the translation of her story into quantitative data by combining a phenomenological qualitative analysis of her therapeutic narrative and a visual analysis of her extensively annotated paper-andpencil questionnaires. Our findings provide a practical empirical
illustration of the nature and impact of known validity issues. Beyond, we found the act of questionnaire administration
affected the primary complaint such that it became performative toward the symptoms under study. We discuss the epistemic consequences for the validity of data, and we argue that valid data collection requires qualitative scrutiny of meaning within data and a concept of validity that allows for consideration of performativity of data collection.}},
  author       = {{Truijens, Femke and Desmet, Mattias and De Coster, Eva and Uyttenhove, Horanka and Deeren, Bram and Meganck, Reitske}},
  issn         = {{1478-0887}},
  journal      = {{QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY}},
  keywords     = {{Psychology,Psychotherapy,Clinical Psychology,Philosophy of Science,Quantitative Research,Qualitative Research,Case study,interpretative phenomenological analysis,psychotherapy research,quantitative data,validity of data collection,validity and performativity,CONSTRUCT-VALIDATION,OBJECTIVITY,EXPERIENCE,THINKING,SCIENCE,NUMBERS,ART}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{244--287}},
  title        = {{When quantitative measures become a qualitative storybook : a phenomenological case analysis of validity and performativity of questionnaire administration in psychotherapy research}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2019.1579287}},
  volume       = {{19}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: