
A prospective study on ultra-wide diameter dental implants for immediate molar replacement
- Author
- André Hattingh, Geert Hommez (UGent) , Hugo De Bruyn (UGent) , Marie Huyghe and Stefan Vandeweghe (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- Background: Although wide diameter implants are well documented, little is known about ultra-wide diameter implants (>6 mm). This study evaluates the clinical outcome of ultra-wide diameter implants, placed in molar extraction sockets. Materials and Methods: Ultra-wide diameter implants (7-9 mm) were placed immediately after molar extraction in a 1-stage protocol, without raising a flap or using any bone grafts. After 4 months, the implant was loaded with a single screw-retained crown. Bone loss was evaluated using peri-apical radiographs. Plaque and bleeding were recorded. Crown and papilla dimensions were measured and compared with the contra-lateral tooth. Results: Fifty-one patients (36 male and 15 female), mean ages 61 years old, were treated with 26 implants in the maxilla and 25 implants in the mandible. The majority had a thick (#19) or medium (#31) biotype. After a mean-follow-up period of 23 months, the mean bone level was located 1.16 mm apical of the implant-abutment junction (SD 0.42, range 0.00-2.45) while the actual bone remodeling associated with socket healing resulted in a mean coronal movement of the bone level of 0.15 mm. The mean insertion torque was 116 Ncm (SD 53, range 10-250). There were no differences in papilla height (P = .55), crown length (P = .32), zenith (P = .84), and bucco-palatal dimensions (P = .38). There was a significant difference in the mesio-distal dimension (P = .01). Mean probing depth was 2.59 mm at the implant and 2.23 mm at the contra-lateral tooth (P = .001). There was significantly more plaque at the tooth compared to the implant (P = .01), but there was no significant difference in terms of bleeding on probing (P = .08). Patient satisfaction was high with 72.5% of the patients experiencing no problems at all. Conclusions: Ultra-wide diameter implants have a predictable outcome, demonstrating very little bone loss. Papilla and crown dimensions were comparable to the contra-lateral natural tooth.
- Keywords
- dental implant, immediate placement, ultra-wide, SINUS FLOOR ELEVATION, SOFT-TISSUE THICKNESS, HIGH INSERTION TORQUE, PRIMARY STABILITY, MAXILLARY SINUS, VOLUMETRIC CHANGES, SINGLE IMPLANTS, 6 MM, BONE, PLACEMENT
Downloads
-
(...).pdf
- full text
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 584.28 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8604013
- MLA
- Hattingh, André, et al. “A Prospective Study on Ultra-Wide Diameter Dental Implants for Immediate Molar Replacement.” CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, vol. 20, no. 6, 2018, pp. 1009–15, doi:10.1111/cid.12666.
- APA
- Hattingh, A., Hommez, G., De Bruyn, H., Huyghe, M., & Vandeweghe, S. (2018). A prospective study on ultra-wide diameter dental implants for immediate molar replacement. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 20(6), 1009–1015. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12666
- Chicago author-date
- Hattingh, André, Geert Hommez, Hugo De Bruyn, Marie Huyghe, and Stefan Vandeweghe. 2018. “A Prospective Study on Ultra-Wide Diameter Dental Implants for Immediate Molar Replacement.” CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH 20 (6): 1009–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12666.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Hattingh, André, Geert Hommez, Hugo De Bruyn, Marie Huyghe, and Stefan Vandeweghe. 2018. “A Prospective Study on Ultra-Wide Diameter Dental Implants for Immediate Molar Replacement.” CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH 20 (6): 1009–1015. doi:10.1111/cid.12666.
- Vancouver
- 1.Hattingh A, Hommez G, De Bruyn H, Huyghe M, Vandeweghe S. A prospective study on ultra-wide diameter dental implants for immediate molar replacement. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH. 2018;20(6):1009–15.
- IEEE
- [1]A. Hattingh, G. Hommez, H. De Bruyn, M. Huyghe, and S. Vandeweghe, “A prospective study on ultra-wide diameter dental implants for immediate molar replacement,” CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1009–1015, 2018.
@article{8604013, abstract = {{Background: Although wide diameter implants are well documented, little is known about ultra-wide diameter implants (>6 mm). This study evaluates the clinical outcome of ultra-wide diameter implants, placed in molar extraction sockets. Materials and Methods: Ultra-wide diameter implants (7-9 mm) were placed immediately after molar extraction in a 1-stage protocol, without raising a flap or using any bone grafts. After 4 months, the implant was loaded with a single screw-retained crown. Bone loss was evaluated using peri-apical radiographs. Plaque and bleeding were recorded. Crown and papilla dimensions were measured and compared with the contra-lateral tooth. Results: Fifty-one patients (36 male and 15 female), mean ages 61 years old, were treated with 26 implants in the maxilla and 25 implants in the mandible. The majority had a thick (#19) or medium (#31) biotype. After a mean-follow-up period of 23 months, the mean bone level was located 1.16 mm apical of the implant-abutment junction (SD 0.42, range 0.00-2.45) while the actual bone remodeling associated with socket healing resulted in a mean coronal movement of the bone level of 0.15 mm. The mean insertion torque was 116 Ncm (SD 53, range 10-250). There were no differences in papilla height (P = .55), crown length (P = .32), zenith (P = .84), and bucco-palatal dimensions (P = .38). There was a significant difference in the mesio-distal dimension (P = .01). Mean probing depth was 2.59 mm at the implant and 2.23 mm at the contra-lateral tooth (P = .001). There was significantly more plaque at the tooth compared to the implant (P = .01), but there was no significant difference in terms of bleeding on probing (P = .08). Patient satisfaction was high with 72.5% of the patients experiencing no problems at all. Conclusions: Ultra-wide diameter implants have a predictable outcome, demonstrating very little bone loss. Papilla and crown dimensions were comparable to the contra-lateral natural tooth.}}, author = {{Hattingh, André and Hommez, Geert and De Bruyn, Hugo and Huyghe, Marie and Vandeweghe, Stefan}}, issn = {{1523-0899}}, journal = {{CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH}}, keywords = {{dental implant,immediate placement,ultra-wide,SINUS FLOOR ELEVATION,SOFT-TISSUE THICKNESS,HIGH INSERTION TORQUE,PRIMARY STABILITY,MAXILLARY SINUS,VOLUMETRIC CHANGES,SINGLE IMPLANTS,6 MM,BONE,PLACEMENT}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{6}}, pages = {{1009--1015}}, title = {{A prospective study on ultra-wide diameter dental implants for immediate molar replacement}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.12666}}, volume = {{20}}, year = {{2018}}, }
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: