Academic Bibliography

 Search 200 years of publications by Ghent University researchers.
Advanced search
1 file | 4.00 MB
Add to list
  1. Search results
  2. Jurisdiction in international dispute...

Jurisdiction in international disputes in commercial matters : a comparison between the Brussels Ibis and the Western Balkans

Donikë Qerimi
(2019)
Author
Promoter
(UGent) and (UGent)
Organization
Abstract
This thesis is a comparative analysis of the jurisdiction rules in commercial matters, provided in Regulation Brussels Ibis, on the one hand, and the six countries of the Western Balkans, on the other. The study aims to give answers to not only the question whether the jurisdiction rules of these countries are approximated with this Regulation, but also ascertains whether they should do so and how. The analysis therein is unfolded through the lens of three main targets towards which jurisdiction can be orientated: the defendant, the contract and property. Having analysed the rules on asserting jurisdiction on these bases, the study then looks at the rules for declining jurisdiction. In its conclusion, the study underscores the similarities and differences between these legal instruments and makes recommendations on how the approximation can advance, while being cautious of the particularities of the political, social and economic situation of these countries.

Downloads

  • Download
    (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 4.00 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Qerimi, Donikë. Jurisdiction in International Disputes in Commercial Matters : A Comparison between the Brussels Ibis and the Western Balkans. 2019.
APA
Qerimi, D. (2019). Jurisdiction in international disputes in commercial matters : a comparison between the Brussels Ibis and the Western Balkans.
Chicago author-date
Qerimi, Donikë. 2019. “Jurisdiction in International Disputes in Commercial Matters : A Comparison between the Brussels Ibis and the Western Balkans.”
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Qerimi, Donikë. 2019. “Jurisdiction in International Disputes in Commercial Matters : A Comparison between the Brussels Ibis and the Western Balkans.”
Vancouver
1.
Qerimi D. Jurisdiction in international disputes in commercial matters : a comparison between the Brussels Ibis and the Western Balkans. 2019.
IEEE
[1]
D. Qerimi, “Jurisdiction in international disputes in commercial matters : a comparison between the Brussels Ibis and the Western Balkans,” 2019.
@phdthesis{8602244,
  abstract     = {{This thesis is a comparative analysis of the jurisdiction rules in commercial matters, provided in Regulation Brussels Ibis, on the one hand, and the six countries of the Western Balkans, on the other. The study aims to give answers to not only the question whether the jurisdiction rules of these countries are approximated with this Regulation, but also ascertains whether they should do so and how. The analysis therein is unfolded through the lens of three main targets towards which jurisdiction can be orientated: the defendant, the contract and property. Having analysed the rules on asserting jurisdiction on these bases, the study then looks at the rules for declining jurisdiction. In its conclusion, the study underscores the similarities and differences between these legal instruments and makes recommendations on how the approximation can advance, while being cautious of the particularities of the political, social and economic situation of these countries.}},
  author       = {{Qerimi, Donikë}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  school       = {{Ghent University}},
  title        = {{Jurisdiction in international disputes in commercial matters : a comparison between the Brussels Ibis and the Western Balkans}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}