Advanced search
1 file | 5.47 MB Add to list

International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology : allergic rhinitis

Author
Organization
Abstract
Background: Critical examination of the quality and validity of available allergic rhinitis (AR) literature is necessary to improve understanding and to appropriately translate this knowledge to clinical care of the AR patient. To evaluate the existing AR literature, international multidisciplinary experts with an interest in AR have produced the International Consensus statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR:AR). Methods: Using previously described methodology, specific topics were developed relating to AR. Each topic was assigned a literature review, evidence-based review (EBR), or evidence-based review with recommendations (EBRR) format as dictated by available evidence and purpose within the ICAR:AR document. Following iterative reviews of each topic, the ICAR:AR document was synthesized and reviewed by all authors for consensus. Results: The ICAR:AR document addresses over 100 individual topics related to AR, including diagnosis, pathophysiology, epidemiology, disease burden, risk factors for the development of AR, allergy testing modalities, treatment, and other conditions/comorbidities associated with AR. Conclusion: This critical review of the AR literature has identified several strengths; providers can be confident that treatment decisions are supported by rigorous studies. However, there are also substantial gaps in the AR literature. These knowledge gaps should be viewed as opportunities for improvement, as often the things that we teach and the medicine that we practice are not based on the best quality evidence. This document aims to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the AR literature to identify areas for future AR research and improved understanding. (C) 2018 ARS-AAOA, LLC.
Keywords
allergen extract, allergy, allergen immunotherapy, allergic rhinitis, antihistamine, asthma, atopic dermatitis, avoidance, biologic, cockroach, conjunctivitis, consensus, corticosteroid, cough, cromolyn, decongestant, eosinophilic esophagitis, environment, epicutaneous immunotherapy, epidemiology, evidence-based medicine, food allergy, genetics, house dust mite, IgE, immunoglobulin E, immunotherapy, inhalant allergy, leukotriene, microbiome, occupational rhinitis, omalizumab, pathophysiology, perennial, pet dander, pollen, probiotic, quality of life, rhinitis, rhinosinusitis, risk factor, saline, seasonal, sensitization, sinusitis, sleep, socioeconomic, specific IgE, subcutaneous immunotherapy, sublingual immunotherapy, systematic review, rhinitis, total IgE, transcutaneous immunotherapy, validated survey, QUALITY-OF-LIFE, HOUSE-DUST-MITE, AZELASTINE NASAL SPRAY, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL, SKIN-PRICK TEST, RANDOMIZED-DOUBLE-BLIND, SERUM IMMUNOGLOBULIN-E, ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE UNIT, JAPANESE CEDAR POLLINOSIS, OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP-APNEA

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 5.47 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Wise, Sarah K et al. “International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology : Allergic Rhinitis.” INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY 8.2 (2018): 108–352. Print.
APA
Wise, S. K., Lin, S. Y., Toskala, E., Orlandi, R. R., Akdis, C. A., Alt, J. A., Azar, A., et al. (2018). International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology : allergic rhinitis. INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 8(2), 108–352.
Chicago author-date
Wise, Sarah K, Sandra Y Lin, Elina Toskala, Richard R Orlandi, Cezmi A Akdis, Jeremiah A Alt, Antoine Azar, et al. 2018. “International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology : Allergic Rhinitis.” International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology 8 (2): 108–352.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Wise, Sarah K, Sandra Y Lin, Elina Toskala, Richard R Orlandi, Cezmi A Akdis, Jeremiah A Alt, Antoine Azar, Fuad M Baroody, Claus Bachert, G Walter Canonica, Thomas Chacko, Cemal Cingi, Giorgio Ciprandi, Jacquelynne Corey, Linda S Cox, Peter Socrates Creticos, Adnan Custovic, Cecelia Damask, Adam DeConde, John M DelGaudio, Charles S Ebert, Jean Anderson Eloy, Carrie E Flanagan, Wytske J Fokkens, Christine Franzese, Jan Gosepath, Ashleigh Halderman, Robert G Hamilton, Hans Jürgen Hoffman, Jens M Hohlfeld, Steven M Houser, Peter H Hwang, Cristoforo Incorvaia, Deborah Jarvis, Ayesha N Khalid, Maritta Kilpeläinen, Todd. T Kingdom, Helene Krouse, Desiree Larenas-Linnemann, Adrienne M Laury, Stella E Lee, Joshua M Levy, Amber U Luong, Bradley F Marple, Edward D McCoul, K Christopher McMains, Erik Melén, James W Mims, Gianna Moscato, Joaquim Mullol, Harold S Nelson, Monica Patadia, Ruby Pawankar, Oliver Pfaar, Michael P Platt, William Reisacher, Carmen Rondón, Luke Rudmik, Matthew Ryan, Joaquin Sastre, Rodney J Schlosser, Russell A Settipane, Hemant P Sharma, Aziz Sheikh, Timothy L Smith, Pongsakorn Tantilipikorn, Jody R Tversky, Maria C Veling, De Yun Wang, Marit Westman, Magnus Wickman, and Mark Zacharek. 2018. “International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology : Allergic Rhinitis.” International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology 8 (2): 108–352.
Vancouver
1.
Wise SK, Lin SY, Toskala E, Orlandi RR, Akdis CA, Alt JA, et al. International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology : allergic rhinitis. INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY. 2018;8(2):108–352.
IEEE
[1]
S. K. Wise et al., “International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology : allergic rhinitis,” INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 108–352, 2018.
@article{8582139,
  abstract     = {Background: Critical examination of the quality and validity of available allergic rhinitis (AR) literature is necessary to improve understanding and to appropriately translate this knowledge to clinical care of the AR patient. To evaluate the existing AR literature, international multidisciplinary experts with an interest in AR have produced the International Consensus statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR:AR). 
Methods: Using previously described methodology, specific topics were developed relating to AR. Each topic was assigned a literature review, evidence-based review (EBR), or evidence-based review with recommendations (EBRR) format as dictated by available evidence and purpose within the ICAR:AR document. Following iterative reviews of each topic, the ICAR:AR document was synthesized and reviewed by all authors for consensus. 
Results: The ICAR:AR document addresses over 100 individual topics related to AR, including diagnosis, pathophysiology, epidemiology, disease burden, risk factors for the development of AR, allergy testing modalities, treatment, and other conditions/comorbidities associated with AR. 
Conclusion: This critical review of the AR literature has identified several strengths; providers can be confident that treatment decisions are supported by rigorous studies. However, there are also substantial gaps in the AR literature. These knowledge gaps should be viewed as opportunities for improvement, as often the things that we teach and the medicine that we practice are not based on the best quality evidence. This document aims to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the AR literature to identify areas for future AR research and improved understanding. (C) 2018 ARS-AAOA, LLC.},
  author       = {Wise, Sarah K and Lin, Sandra Y and Toskala, Elina and Orlandi, Richard R and Akdis, Cezmi A and Alt, Jeremiah A and Azar, Antoine and Baroody, Fuad M and Bachert, Claus and Canonica, G Walter and Chacko, Thomas and Cingi, Cemal and Ciprandi, Giorgio and Corey, Jacquelynne and Cox, Linda S and Creticos, Peter Socrates and Custovic, Adnan and Damask, Cecelia and DeConde, Adam and DelGaudio, John M and Ebert, Charles S and Eloy, Jean Anderson and Flanagan, Carrie E and Fokkens, Wytske J and Franzese, Christine and Gosepath, Jan and Halderman, Ashleigh and Hamilton, Robert G and Hoffman, Hans Jürgen and Hohlfeld, Jens M and Houser, Steven M and Hwang, Peter H and Incorvaia, Cristoforo and Jarvis, Deborah and Khalid, Ayesha N and Kilpeläinen, Maritta and Kingdom, Todd. T and Krouse, Helene and Larenas-Linnemann, Desiree and Laury, Adrienne M and Lee, Stella E and Levy, Joshua M and Luong, Amber U and Marple, Bradley F and McCoul, Edward D and McMains, K Christopher and Melén, Erik and Mims, James W and Moscato, Gianna and Mullol, Joaquim and Nelson, Harold S and Patadia, Monica and Pawankar, Ruby and Pfaar, Oliver and Platt, Michael P and Reisacher, William and Rondón, Carmen and Rudmik, Luke and Ryan, Matthew and Sastre, Joaquin and Schlosser, Rodney J and Settipane, Russell A and Sharma, Hemant P and Sheikh, Aziz and Smith, Timothy L and Tantilipikorn, Pongsakorn and Tversky, Jody R and Veling, Maria C and Wang, De Yun and Westman, Marit and Wickman, Magnus and Zacharek, Mark},
  issn         = {2042-6976},
  journal      = {INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY},
  keywords     = {allergen extract,allergy,allergen immunotherapy,allergic rhinitis,antihistamine,asthma,atopic dermatitis,avoidance,biologic,cockroach,conjunctivitis,consensus,corticosteroid,cough,cromolyn,decongestant,eosinophilic esophagitis,environment,epicutaneous immunotherapy,epidemiology,evidence-based medicine,food allergy,genetics,house dust mite,IgE,immunoglobulin E,immunotherapy,inhalant allergy,leukotriene,microbiome,occupational rhinitis,omalizumab,pathophysiology,perennial,pet dander,pollen,probiotic,quality of life,rhinitis,rhinosinusitis,risk factor,saline,seasonal,sensitization,sinusitis,sleep,socioeconomic,specific IgE,subcutaneous immunotherapy,sublingual immunotherapy,systematic review,rhinitis,total IgE,transcutaneous immunotherapy,validated survey,QUALITY-OF-LIFE,HOUSE-DUST-MITE,AZELASTINE NASAL SPRAY,PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL,SKIN-PRICK TEST,RANDOMIZED-DOUBLE-BLIND,SERUM IMMUNOGLOBULIN-E,ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE UNIT,JAPANESE CEDAR POLLINOSIS,OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP-APNEA},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {2},
  pages        = {108--352},
  title        = {International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology : allergic rhinitis},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/alr.22073},
  volume       = {8},
  year         = {2018},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: