Advanced search
1 file | 495.18 KB Add to list

Biological aspects : summary and consensus statements of group 2. The 5th EAO consensus conference 2018

(2018) CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH. 29(suppl. 18). p.152-156
Author
Organization
Abstract
Objectives: This publication reports the EAO Workshop group-2 discussions and consensus statements which provided the scientific evidence on the influence of biological parameters on implant-related clinical outcomes. Material and methods: The first publication was a systematic review on the biological effects of abutment material on the stability of peri-implant marginal bone levels and the second, a critical narrative review on how peri-implant diagnostic parameters correspond with long-term implant survival and success. The group evaluated the content of both publications, made corrections and recommendations to the authors and agreed on the consensus statements, clinical recommendations and recommendations for future research, which are described in this consensus report. Results: Tested abutment materials can be considered appropriate for clinical use according to the observation period studied (mean 3.5 years). Mean peri-implant bone loss and mean probing pocket depths are not adequate outcomes to study the prevalence of peri-implantitis, while the reporting of frequency distributions is considered more appropriate. Conclusions: Titanium is currently considered the standard of care as abutment material, although other materials may be more suitable for aesthetic locations. Peri-implantitis should be diagnosed through composite evaluations of peri-implant tissue inflammation and assessment of marginal bone loss with different thresholds.
Keywords
abutment materials, bleeding on probing, dental implants, peri-implant bone loss, peri-implant probing depth, peri-implantitis, SOFT-TISSUE COLOR, ABUTMENT MATERIAL, IMPLANT, TITANIUM, RESTORATIONS, METAANALYSIS, ZIRCONIA

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 495.18 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Sanz, Mariano et al. “Biological Aspects : Summary and Consensus Statements of Group 2. The 5th EAO Consensus Conference 2018.” CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH 29.suppl. 18 (2018): 152–156. Print.
APA
Sanz, M., Klinge, B., Alcoforado, G., Bienz, S. P., Cosyn, J., De Bruyn, H., Derks, J., et al. (2018). Biological aspects : summary and consensus statements of group 2. The 5th EAO consensus conference 2018. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 29(suppl. 18), 152–156. Presented at the 5th EAO Consensus conference.
Chicago author-date
Sanz, Mariano, Bjorn Klinge, Gil Alcoforado, Stefan P Bienz, Jan Cosyn, Hugo De Bruyn, Jan Derks, et al. 2018. “Biological Aspects : Summary and Consensus Statements of Group 2. The 5th EAO Consensus Conference 2018.” Clinical Oral Implants Research 29 (suppl. 18): 152–156.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Sanz, Mariano, Bjorn Klinge, Gil Alcoforado, Stefan P Bienz, Jan Cosyn, Hugo De Bruyn, Jan Derks, Elena Figuero, Katarzyna Gurzawska, Lisa Heitz-Mayfield, Ronald E Jung, Tunker Ornekul, and Alberto Sagado. 2018. “Biological Aspects : Summary and Consensus Statements of Group 2. The 5th EAO Consensus Conference 2018.” Clinical Oral Implants Research 29 (suppl. 18): 152–156.
Vancouver
1.
Sanz M, Klinge B, Alcoforado G, Bienz SP, Cosyn J, De Bruyn H, et al. Biological aspects : summary and consensus statements of group 2. The 5th EAO consensus conference 2018. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH. 2018;29(suppl. 18):152–6.
IEEE
[1]
M. Sanz et al., “Biological aspects : summary and consensus statements of group 2. The 5th EAO consensus conference 2018,” CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, vol. 29, no. suppl. 18, pp. 152–156, 2018.
@article{8581049,
  abstract     = {Objectives: This publication reports the EAO Workshop group-2 discussions and consensus statements which provided the scientific evidence on the influence of biological parameters on implant-related clinical outcomes. 
Material and methods: The first publication was a systematic review on the biological effects of abutment material on the stability of peri-implant marginal bone levels and the second, a critical narrative review on how peri-implant diagnostic parameters correspond with long-term implant survival and success. The group evaluated the content of both publications, made corrections and recommendations to the authors and agreed on the consensus statements, clinical recommendations and recommendations for future research, which are described in this consensus report. 
Results: Tested abutment materials can be considered appropriate for clinical use according to the observation period studied (mean 3.5 years). Mean peri-implant bone loss and mean probing pocket depths are not adequate outcomes to study the prevalence of peri-implantitis, while the reporting of frequency distributions is considered more appropriate. 
Conclusions: Titanium is currently considered the standard of care as abutment material, although other materials may be more suitable for aesthetic locations. Peri-implantitis should be diagnosed through composite evaluations of peri-implant tissue inflammation and assessment of marginal bone loss with different thresholds.},
  author       = {Sanz, Mariano and Klinge, Bjorn and Alcoforado, Gil and Bienz, Stefan P and Cosyn, Jan and De Bruyn, Hugo and Derks, Jan and Figuero, Elena and Gurzawska, Katarzyna and Heitz-Mayfield, Lisa and Jung, Ronald E and Ornekul, Tunker and Sagado, Alberto},
  issn         = {0905-7161},
  journal      = {CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH},
  keywords     = {abutment materials,bleeding on probing,dental implants,peri-implant bone loss,peri-implant probing depth,peri-implantitis,SOFT-TISSUE COLOR,ABUTMENT MATERIAL,IMPLANT,TITANIUM,RESTORATIONS,METAANALYSIS,ZIRCONIA},
  language     = {eng},
  location     = {Pfaffikon, Switzerland},
  number       = {suppl. 18},
  pages        = {152--156},
  title        = {Biological aspects : summary and consensus statements of group 2. The 5th EAO consensus conference 2018},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.13274},
  volume       = {29},
  year         = {2018},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: