Advanced search
1 file | 305.12 KB

Dental implant register : summary and consensus statements of group 2. The 5th EAO consensus conference 2018

(2018) CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH. 29(suppl. 18). p.157-159
Author
Organization
Abstract
Objectives: This publication reports the EAO Workshop group-2 and consensus plenary discussions and statements on a narrative review providing the background and possible facilities and importance of a dental implant register, to allow for a systematic follow-up of the clinical outcome of dental implant treatment in various clinical settings. It should be observed that the format of the review and the subsequent consensus report consciously departs from conventional consensus publications and reports. Material and methods: The publication was a narrative review on the presence and significance of quality registers regarding select medical conditions and procedures. The group discussed and evaluated the publication and made corrections and recommendations to the authors and agreed on the statements and recommendations described in this consensus report. Results: Possible registrations to be included in an implant register were discussed and agreed as a preliminary basis for further development, meaning that additional parameters be included or some be deleted. Conclusions: It was agreed to bring the idea of an implant quality register, including the presented results of discussions and proposals by the group- and plenary sessions, to the EAO Board for further discussion and decision.
Keywords
clinical assessment, diagnosis, epidemiology, patient centered outcomes, quality register, statistics

Downloads

  • Klinge et al-2018-Clinical Oral Implants Research (1).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 305.12 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

Chicago
Klinge, Björn, Mariano Sanz, Gil Alcoforado, Stefan P Bienz, Jan Cosyn, Hugo De Bruyn, Jan Derks, et al. 2018. “Dental Implant Register : Summary and Consensus Statements of Group 2. The 5th EAO Consensus Conference 2018.” Clinical Oral Implants Research 29 (suppl. 18): 157–159.
APA
Klinge, B., Sanz, M., Alcoforado, G., Bienz, S. P., Cosyn, J., De Bruyn, H., Derks, J., et al. (2018). Dental implant register : summary and consensus statements of group 2. The 5th EAO consensus conference 2018. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 29(suppl. 18), 157–159. Presented at the 5th EAO Consensus conference.
Vancouver
1.
Klinge B, Sanz M, Alcoforado G, Bienz SP, Cosyn J, De Bruyn H, et al. Dental implant register : summary and consensus statements of group 2. The 5th EAO consensus conference 2018. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH. 2018;29(suppl. 18):157–9.
MLA
Klinge, Björn et al. “Dental Implant Register : Summary and Consensus Statements of Group 2. The 5th EAO Consensus Conference 2018.” CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH 29.suppl. 18 (2018): 157–159. Print.
@article{8581047,
  abstract     = {Objectives: This publication reports the EAO Workshop group-2 and consensus plenary discussions and statements on a narrative review providing the background and possible facilities and importance of a dental implant register, to allow for a systematic follow-up of the clinical outcome of dental implant treatment in various clinical settings. It should be observed that the format of the review and the subsequent consensus report consciously departs from conventional consensus publications and reports. 
Material and methods: The publication was a narrative review on the presence and significance of quality registers regarding select medical conditions and procedures. The group discussed and evaluated the publication and made corrections and recommendations to the authors and agreed on the statements and recommendations described in this consensus report. 
Results: Possible registrations to be included in an implant register were discussed and agreed as a preliminary basis for further development, meaning that additional parameters be included or some be deleted. 
Conclusions: It was agreed to bring the idea of an implant quality register, including the presented results of discussions and proposals by the group- and plenary sessions, to the EAO Board for further discussion and decision.},
  author       = {Klinge, Bj{\"o}rn and Sanz, Mariano and Alcoforado, Gil and Bienz, Stefan P and Cosyn, Jan and De Bruyn, Hugo and Derks, Jan and Figuero, Elena and Gurzawska, Katarzyna and Heitz-Mayfield, Lisa and Jung, Ronald E and Ornekul, Turker and Sagado, Alberto},
  issn         = {0905-7161},
  journal      = {CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH},
  language     = {eng},
  location     = {Pfaffikon, Switzerland},
  number       = {suppl. 18},
  pages        = {157--159},
  title        = {Dental implant register : summary and consensus statements of group 2. The 5th EAO consensus conference 2018},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.13269},
  volume       = {29},
  year         = {2018},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: