Advanced search
1 file | 2.25 MB Add to list

Integration of oncology and palliative care : a Lancet Oncology Commission

(2018) LANCET ONCOLOGY. 19(11). p.e588-e653
Author
Organization
Abstract
Full integration of oncology and palliative care relies on the specific knowledge and skills of two modes of care: the tumour-directed approach, the main focus of which is on treating the disease; and the host-directed approach, which focuses on the patient with the disease. This Commission addresses how to combine these two paradigms to achieve the best outcome of patient care. Randomised clinical trials on integration of oncology and palliative care point to health gains: improved survival and symptom control, less anxiety and depression, reduced use of futile chemotherapy at the end of life, improved family satisfaction and quality of life, and improved use of health-care resources. Early delivery of patient-directed care by specialist palliative care teams alongside tumour-directed treatment promotes patient-centred care. Systematic assessment and use of patient-reported outcomes and active patient involvement in the decisions about cancer care result in better symptom control, improved physical and mental health, and better use of health-care resources. The absence of international agreements on the content and standards of the organisation, education, and research of palliative care in oncology are major barriers to successful integration. Other barriers include the common misconception that palliative care is end-of-life care only, stigmatisation of death and dying, and insufficient infrastructure and funding. The absence of established priorities might also hinder integration more widely. This Commission proposes the use of standardised care pathways and multidisciplinary teams to promote integration of oncology and palliative care, and calls for changes at the system level to coordinate the activities of professionals, and for the development and implementation of new and improved education programmes, with the overall goal of improving patient care. Integration raises new research questions, all of which contribute to improved clinical care. When and how should palliative care be delivered? What is the optimal model for integrated care? What is the biological and clinical effect of living with advanced cancer for years after diagnosis? Successful integration must challenge the dualistic perspective of either the tumour or the host, and instead focus on a merged approach that places the patient's perspective at the centre. To succeed, integration must be anchored by management and policy makers at all levels of health care, followed by adequate resource allocation, a willingness to prioritise goals and needs, and sustained enthusiasm to help generate support for better integration. This integrated model must be reflected in international and national cancer plans, and be followed by developments of new care models, education and research programmes, all of which should be adapted to the specific cultural contexts within which they are situated. Patient-centred care should be an integrated part of oncology care independent of patient prognosis and treatment intention. To achieve this goal it must be based on changes in professional cultures and priorities in health care.
Keywords
END-OF-LIFE, PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, SHARED DECISION-MAKING, SYMPTOM ASSESSMENT SYSTEM, ADVANCED CANCER-PATIENTS, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL, TERMINALLY-ILL PATIENTS, CENTERED COMMUNICATION INTERVENTION, OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY-DISEASE, CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES, EoLC

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 2.25 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Kaasa, Stein, et al. “Integration of Oncology and Palliative Care : A Lancet Oncology Commission.” LANCET ONCOLOGY, vol. 19, no. 11, 2018, pp. e588–653, doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30415-7.
APA
Kaasa, S., Loge, J. H., Aapro, M., Albreht, T., Anderson, R., Bruera, E., … Lundeby, T. (2018). Integration of oncology and palliative care : a Lancet Oncology Commission. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 19(11), e588–e653. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30415-7
Chicago author-date
Kaasa, Stein, Jon H Loge, Matti Aapro, Tit Albreht, Rebecca Anderson, Eduardo Bruera, Cinzia Brunelli, et al. 2018. “Integration of Oncology and Palliative Care : A Lancet Oncology Commission.” LANCET ONCOLOGY 19 (11): e588–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30415-7.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Kaasa, Stein, Jon H Loge, Matti Aapro, Tit Albreht, Rebecca Anderson, Eduardo Bruera, Cinzia Brunelli, Augusto Caraceni, Andrés Cervantes, David C Currow, Luc Deliens, Marie Fallon, Xavier Gómez-Batiste, Kjersti S Grotmol, Breffni Hannon, Dagny F Haugen, Irene J Higginson, Marianne J Hjermstad, David Hui, Karin Jordan, Geana P Kurita, Philip J Larkin, Guido Miccinesi, Friedemann Nauck, Rade Pribakovic, Gary Rodin, Per Sjøgren, Patrick Stone, Camilla Zimmermann, and Tonje Lundeby. 2018. “Integration of Oncology and Palliative Care : A Lancet Oncology Commission.” LANCET ONCOLOGY 19 (11): e588–e653. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30415-7.
Vancouver
1.
Kaasa S, Loge JH, Aapro M, Albreht T, Anderson R, Bruera E, et al. Integration of oncology and palliative care : a Lancet Oncology Commission. LANCET ONCOLOGY. 2018;19(11):e588–653.
IEEE
[1]
S. Kaasa et al., “Integration of oncology and palliative care : a Lancet Oncology Commission,” LANCET ONCOLOGY, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. e588–e653, 2018.
@article{8580153,
  abstract     = {{Full integration of oncology and palliative care relies on the specific knowledge and skills of two modes of care: the tumour-directed approach, the main focus of which is on treating the disease; and the host-directed approach, which focuses on the patient with the disease. This Commission addresses how to combine these two paradigms to achieve the best outcome of patient care. Randomised clinical trials on integration of oncology and palliative care point to health gains: improved survival and symptom control, less anxiety and depression, reduced use of futile chemotherapy at the end of life, improved family satisfaction and quality of life, and improved use of health-care resources. Early delivery of patient-directed care by specialist palliative care teams alongside tumour-directed treatment promotes patient-centred care. Systematic assessment and use of patient-reported outcomes and active patient involvement in the decisions about cancer care result in better symptom control, improved physical and mental health, and better use of health-care resources. The absence of international agreements on the content and standards of the organisation, education, and research of palliative care in oncology are major barriers to successful integration. Other barriers include the common misconception that palliative care is end-of-life care only, stigmatisation of death and dying, and insufficient infrastructure and funding. The absence of established priorities might also hinder integration more widely. This Commission proposes the use of standardised care pathways and multidisciplinary teams to promote integration of oncology and palliative care, and calls for changes at the system level to coordinate the activities of professionals, and for the development and implementation of new and improved education programmes, with the overall goal of improving patient care. Integration raises new research questions, all of which contribute to improved clinical care. When and how should palliative care be delivered? What is the optimal model for integrated care? What is the biological and clinical effect of living with advanced cancer for years after diagnosis? Successful integration must challenge the dualistic perspective of either the tumour or the host, and instead focus on a merged approach that places the patient's perspective at the centre. To succeed, integration must be anchored by management and policy makers at all levels of health care, followed by adequate resource allocation, a willingness to prioritise goals and needs, and sustained enthusiasm to help generate support for better integration. This integrated model must be reflected in international and national cancer plans, and be followed by developments of new care models, education and research programmes, all of which should be adapted to the specific cultural contexts within which they are situated. Patient-centred care should be an integrated part of oncology care independent of patient prognosis and treatment intention. To achieve this goal it must be based on changes in professional cultures and priorities in health care.}},
  author       = {{Kaasa, Stein and Loge, Jon H and Aapro, Matti and Albreht, Tit and Anderson, Rebecca and Bruera, Eduardo and Brunelli, Cinzia and Caraceni, Augusto and Cervantes, Andrés and Currow, David C and Deliens, Luc and Fallon, Marie and Gómez-Batiste, Xavier and Grotmol, Kjersti S and Hannon, Breffni and Haugen, Dagny F and Higginson, Irene J and Hjermstad, Marianne J and Hui, David and Jordan, Karin and Kurita, Geana P and Larkin, Philip J and Miccinesi, Guido and Nauck, Friedemann and Pribakovic, Rade and Rodin, Gary and Sjøgren, Per and Stone, Patrick and Zimmermann, Camilla and Lundeby, Tonje}},
  issn         = {{1470-2045}},
  journal      = {{LANCET ONCOLOGY}},
  keywords     = {{END-OF-LIFE,PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES,SHARED DECISION-MAKING,SYMPTOM ASSESSMENT SYSTEM,ADVANCED CANCER-PATIENTS,RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL,TERMINALLY-ILL PATIENTS,CENTERED COMMUNICATION INTERVENTION,OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY-DISEASE,CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES,EoLC}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{11}},
  pages        = {{e588--e653}},
  title        = {{Integration of oncology and palliative care : a Lancet Oncology Commission}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30415-7}},
  volume       = {{19}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: