Advanced search
1 file | 487.82 KB Add to list

European Court of Human Rights, Egill Einarsson (no. 2) v. Iceland

Dirk Voorhoof (UGent)
Author
Organization
Abstract
In Iceland a person (hereafter: X) posted a critical and defamatory comment on a Facebook page, calling a well-known personality in Iceland, Mr. Einarsson, a rapist, although upon the completion of the police investigation the Public Prosecutor had dismissed all cases against him related to sexual offences. A District Court found that X’s comment on Facebook had been defamatory and declared the statements null and void. But it dismissed Einarsson’s claim for the imposition on X of a criminal punishment under the Penal Code, and it did not award Einarsson non-pecuniary damage. Before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) Einarsson complained about a violation of his right to respect for his private life and reputation as provided in Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
Keywords
Freedom of expression, privacy, reputation, factual basis, proportionality

Downloads

  • IRIS2018.9.EinarssonIceland.DV.pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 487.82 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Voorhoof, Dirk. “European Court of Human Rights, Egill Einarsson (No. 2) v. Iceland.” IRIS (ENGLISH ED. ONLINE), no. 9, European Audiovisual Observatory, 2018, pp. 2–3.
APA
Voorhoof, D. (2018). European Court of Human Rights, Egill Einarsson (no. 2) v. Iceland. IRIS (ENGLISH ED. ONLINE), (9), 2–3.
Chicago author-date
Voorhoof, Dirk. 2018. “European Court of Human Rights, Egill Einarsson (No. 2) v. Iceland.” IRIS (ENGLISH ED. ONLINE), no. 9: 2–3.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Voorhoof, Dirk. 2018. “European Court of Human Rights, Egill Einarsson (No. 2) v. Iceland.” IRIS (ENGLISH ED. ONLINE) (9): 2–3.
Vancouver
1.
Voorhoof D. European Court of Human Rights, Egill Einarsson (no. 2) v. Iceland. IRIS (ENGLISH ED ONLINE). 2018;(9):2–3.
IEEE
[1]
D. Voorhoof, “European Court of Human Rights, Egill Einarsson (no. 2) v. Iceland,” IRIS (ENGLISH ED. ONLINE), no. 9, pp. 2–3, 2018.
@article{8579596,
  abstract     = {{In Iceland a person (hereafter: X) posted a critical and defamatory comment on a Facebook page, calling a  well-known personality in Iceland, Mr. Einarsson, a rapist, although upon the completion of the police investigation the Public Prosecutor had dismissed all cases against him related to sexual offences. A District Court found that X’s comment on Facebook had been defamatory and declared the statements null and void. But it dismissed Einarsson’s claim for the imposition on X of a criminal punishment under the Penal Code, and it did not award Einarsson non-pecuniary damage. Before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) Einarsson complained about a violation of his right to respect for his private life and reputation as provided in Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).}},
  author       = {{Voorhoof, Dirk}},
  issn         = {{1023-8565}},
  journal      = {{IRIS (ENGLISH ED. ONLINE)}},
  keywords     = {{Freedom of expression,privacy,reputation,factual basis,proportionality}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{9}},
  pages        = {{2--3}},
  publisher    = {{European Audiovisual Observatory}},
  title        = {{European Court of Human Rights, Egill Einarsson (no. 2) v. Iceland}},
  url          = {{http://merlin.obs.coe.int/newsletter.php?year=2018&issue=9&iris_ref=2018+9+2}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}