
European Court of Human Rights, Egill Einarsson (no. 2) v. Iceland
- Author
- Dirk Voorhoof (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- In Iceland a person (hereafter: X) posted a critical and defamatory comment on a Facebook page, calling a well-known personality in Iceland, Mr. Einarsson, a rapist, although upon the completion of the police investigation the Public Prosecutor had dismissed all cases against him related to sexual offences. A District Court found that X’s comment on Facebook had been defamatory and declared the statements null and void. But it dismissed Einarsson’s claim for the imposition on X of a criminal punishment under the Penal Code, and it did not award Einarsson non-pecuniary damage. Before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) Einarsson complained about a violation of his right to respect for his private life and reputation as provided in Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
- Keywords
- Freedom of expression, privacy, reputation, factual basis, proportionality
Downloads
-
IRIS2018.9.EinarssonIceland.DV.pdf
- full text
- |
- open access
- |
- |
- 487.82 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8579596
- MLA
- Voorhoof, Dirk. “European Court of Human Rights, Egill Einarsson (No. 2) v. Iceland.” IRIS (ENGLISH ED. ONLINE), no. 9, European Audiovisual Observatory, 2018, pp. 2–3.
- APA
- Voorhoof, D. (2018). European Court of Human Rights, Egill Einarsson (no. 2) v. Iceland. IRIS (ENGLISH ED. ONLINE), (9), 2–3.
- Chicago author-date
- Voorhoof, Dirk. 2018. “European Court of Human Rights, Egill Einarsson (No. 2) v. Iceland.” IRIS (ENGLISH ED. ONLINE), no. 9: 2–3.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Voorhoof, Dirk. 2018. “European Court of Human Rights, Egill Einarsson (No. 2) v. Iceland.” IRIS (ENGLISH ED. ONLINE) (9): 2–3.
- Vancouver
- 1.Voorhoof D. European Court of Human Rights, Egill Einarsson (no. 2) v. Iceland. IRIS (ENGLISH ED ONLINE). 2018;(9):2–3.
- IEEE
- [1]D. Voorhoof, “European Court of Human Rights, Egill Einarsson (no. 2) v. Iceland,” IRIS (ENGLISH ED. ONLINE), no. 9, pp. 2–3, 2018.
@article{8579596, abstract = {{In Iceland a person (hereafter: X) posted a critical and defamatory comment on a Facebook page, calling a well-known personality in Iceland, Mr. Einarsson, a rapist, although upon the completion of the police investigation the Public Prosecutor had dismissed all cases against him related to sexual offences. A District Court found that X’s comment on Facebook had been defamatory and declared the statements null and void. But it dismissed Einarsson’s claim for the imposition on X of a criminal punishment under the Penal Code, and it did not award Einarsson non-pecuniary damage. Before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) Einarsson complained about a violation of his right to respect for his private life and reputation as provided in Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).}}, author = {{Voorhoof, Dirk}}, issn = {{1023-8565}}, journal = {{IRIS (ENGLISH ED. ONLINE)}}, keywords = {{Freedom of expression,privacy,reputation,factual basis,proportionality}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{9}}, pages = {{2--3}}, publisher = {{European Audiovisual Observatory}}, title = {{European Court of Human Rights, Egill Einarsson (no. 2) v. Iceland}}, url = {{http://merlin.obs.coe.int/newsletter.php?year=2018&issue=9&iris_ref=2018+9+2}}, year = {{2018}}, }