Academic Bibliography

 Search 200 years of publications by Ghent University researchers.
Advanced search
1 file | 28.00 KB
Add to list
  1. Search results
  2. The Grand Chamber strikes again: Béda...

The Grand Chamber strikes again: Bédat v. Switzerland. Criminal conviction of journalist for having published documents covered by investigative secrecy in a criminal case is no violation of Article 10 ECHR

Dirk Voorhoof (UGent)
(2016) European Court of Human Rights Blog.
Author
Organization
Keywords
Freedom of expression, court reporting, presumption of innocence, confidentiality, HRC

Downloads

  • Download
    (...).docx
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • Word
    • |
    • 28.00 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Voorhoof, Dirk. “The Grand Chamber Strikes Again: Bédat v. Switzerland. Criminal Conviction of Journalist for Having Published Documents Covered by Investigative Secrecy in a Criminal Case Is No Violation of Article 10 ECHR.” European Court of Human Rights Blog, edited by Antoine Buysse, no. 7 April 2016, ECHR BLOG, 2016.
APA
Voorhoof, D. (2016). The Grand Chamber strikes again: Bédat v. Switzerland. Criminal conviction of journalist for having published documents covered by investigative secrecy in a criminal case is no violation of Article 10 ECHR (A. Buysse, Ed.). Strasbourg / Utrecht: ECHR BLOG.
Chicago author-date
Voorhoof, Dirk. 2016. “The Grand Chamber Strikes Again: Bédat v. Switzerland. Criminal Conviction of Journalist for Having Published Documents Covered by Investigative Secrecy in a Criminal Case Is No Violation of Article 10 ECHR.” Edited by Antoine Buysse. European Court of Human Rights Blog. Strasbourg / Utrecht: ECHR BLOG.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Voorhoof, Dirk. 2016. “The Grand Chamber Strikes Again: Bédat v. Switzerland. Criminal Conviction of Journalist for Having Published Documents Covered by Investigative Secrecy in a Criminal Case Is No Violation of Article 10 ECHR.” Ed by. Antoine Buysse. European Court of Human Rights Blog. Strasbourg / Utrecht: ECHR BLOG.
Vancouver
1.
Voorhoof D. The Grand Chamber strikes again: Bédat v. Switzerland. Criminal conviction of journalist for having published documents covered by investigative secrecy in a criminal case is no violation of Article 10 ECHR. Buysse A, editor. European Court of Human Rights Blog. Strasbourg / Utrecht: ECHR BLOG; 2016.
IEEE
[1]
D. Voorhoof, “The Grand Chamber strikes again: Bédat v. Switzerland. Criminal conviction of journalist for having published documents covered by investigative secrecy in a criminal case is no violation of Article 10 ECHR,” European Court of Human Rights Blog, no. 7 April 2016. ECHR BLOG, Strasbourg / Utrecht, 2016.
@misc{8579354,
  author       = {{Voorhoof, Dirk}},
  editor       = {{Buysse, Antoine}},
  keywords     = {{Freedom of expression,court reporting,presumption of innocence,confidentiality,HRC}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{7 April 2016}},
  pages        = {{6}},
  publisher    = {{ECHR BLOG}},
  series       = {{European Court of Human Rights Blog}},
  title        = {{The Grand Chamber strikes again: Bédat v. Switzerland. Criminal conviction of journalist for having published documents covered by investigative secrecy in a criminal case is no violation of Article 10 ECHR}},
  url          = {{http://echrblog.blogspot.com/2016/04/guest-post-grand-chamber-judgment-bedat.html}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}