Advanced search
1 file | 215.17 KB Add to list

Does US expectancy mediate the additive effects of CS-US pairings on contingency instructions? Results from subjective, psychophysiological and neural measures

Author
Organization
Keywords
Fear conditioning, Learning

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 215.17 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Mertens, Gaëtan, et al. “Does US Expectancy Mediate the Additive Effects of CS-US Pairings on Contingency Instructions? Results from Subjective, Psychophysiological and Neural Measures.” BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, vol. 110, Elsevier BV, 2018, pp. 41–46, doi:10.1016/j.brat.2018.09.003.
APA
Mertens, G., Braem, S., Kuhn, M., Lonsdorf, T. B., van den Hout, M. A., & Engelhard, I. M. (2018). Does US expectancy mediate the additive effects of CS-US pairings on contingency instructions? Results from subjective, psychophysiological and neural measures. BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 110, 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2018.09.003
Chicago author-date
Mertens, Gaëtan, Senne Braem, Manuel Kuhn, Tina B. Lonsdorf, Marcel A. van den Hout, and Iris M. Engelhard. 2018. “Does US Expectancy Mediate the Additive Effects of CS-US Pairings on Contingency Instructions? Results from Subjective, Psychophysiological and Neural Measures.” BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY 110: 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2018.09.003.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Mertens, Gaëtan, Senne Braem, Manuel Kuhn, Tina B. Lonsdorf, Marcel A. van den Hout, and Iris M. Engelhard. 2018. “Does US Expectancy Mediate the Additive Effects of CS-US Pairings on Contingency Instructions? Results from Subjective, Psychophysiological and Neural Measures.” BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY 110: 41–46. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2018.09.003.
Vancouver
1.
Mertens G, Braem S, Kuhn M, Lonsdorf TB, van den Hout MA, Engelhard IM. Does US expectancy mediate the additive effects of CS-US pairings on contingency instructions? Results from subjective, psychophysiological and neural measures. BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY. 2018;110:41–6.
IEEE
[1]
G. Mertens, S. Braem, M. Kuhn, T. B. Lonsdorf, M. A. van den Hout, and I. M. Engelhard, “Does US expectancy mediate the additive effects of CS-US pairings on contingency instructions? Results from subjective, psychophysiological and neural measures,” BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, vol. 110, pp. 41–46, 2018.
@article{8573387,
  author       = {{Mertens, Gaëtan and Braem, Senne and Kuhn, Manuel and Lonsdorf, Tina B. and van den Hout, Marcel A. and Engelhard, Iris M.}},
  issn         = {{0005-7967}},
  journal      = {{BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY}},
  keywords     = {{Fear conditioning,Learning}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{41--46}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier BV}},
  title        = {{Does US expectancy mediate the additive effects of CS-US pairings on contingency instructions? Results from subjective, psychophysiological and neural measures}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2018.09.003}},
  volume       = {{110}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: