
Massed versus spaced practice in vocology : effect of a short-term intensive voice therapy versus a long-term traditional voice therapy
- Author
- Iris Meerschman (UGent) , Sofie Claeys (UGent) , Kim Bettens (UGent) , Laura Bruneel (UGent) , Evelien D'haeseleer (UGent) and Kristiane Van Lierde (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of a short-term intensive voice therapy (IVT) with a long-term traditional voice therapy (TVT) on the vocal quality, vocal capacities, psychosocial impact, vocal tract discomfort, laryngological anatomy/physiology, and session attendance of patients with dysphonia. An additional comparison was made between an individual IVT (IVT-I) and a group IVT (IVT-G). Method: A longitudinal, prospective controlled trial was used. Forty-six adults diagnosed with dysphonia were assigned to 1 of the 3 treatment groups. The IVT groups practiced with a frequency of 1 hr 20 min a day and a duration of 2 weeks. The TVT group practiced with a frequency of two 30-min sessions a week and a duration of 6 months. Both therapy programs were content-identical and guided by the same voice therapist. A multidimensional voice assessment consisting of both objective (maximum performance task, aerodynamic measurements, voice range profile, acoustic analysis, multiparametric voice quality indices) and subjective (subject's self-report, auditory-perceptual evaluation, flexible videolaryngostroboscopy) outcomes was used to evaluate the participants' voice. Results: IVT made an equal progress in only 2 weeks and 12 hr of therapy compared with TVT that needed 6 months and 24 hr of therapy. IVT-I and IVT-G showed comparable results. Session attendance was clearly higher in IVT compared with TVT. Long-term follow-up results (1 year) were positive for the 3 groups, except for the self-reported psychosocial impact that increased in the IVT-I group. Conclusions: Short-term IVT is at least equally effective in treating patients with dysphonia as long-term TVT. Group treatment seemed as effective as individual treatment. Attendance and cost-effectiveness are important advantages of IVT. A potential drawback might be an insufficient psychosocial progress. The golden mean between intensive and traditional treatment might therefore be an achievable, effective, and efficient solution for everyday clinical practice.
- Keywords
- DISORDERS, TELEPRACTICE, DELIVERY, INDEX
Downloads
-
(...).pdf
- full text
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 850.01 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8572801
- MLA
- Meerschman, Iris, et al. “Massed versus Spaced Practice in Vocology : Effect of a Short-Term Intensive Voice Therapy versus a Long-Term Traditional Voice Therapy.” JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, vol. 62, no. 3, 2019, pp. 611–30, doi:10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-18-0013.
- APA
- Meerschman, I., Claeys, S., Bettens, K., Bruneel, L., D’haeseleer, E., & Van Lierde, K. (2019). Massed versus spaced practice in vocology : effect of a short-term intensive voice therapy versus a long-term traditional voice therapy. JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 62(3), 611–630. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-18-0013
- Chicago author-date
- Meerschman, Iris, Sofie Claeys, Kim Bettens, Laura Bruneel, Evelien D’haeseleer, and Kristiane Van Lierde. 2019. “Massed versus Spaced Practice in Vocology : Effect of a Short-Term Intensive Voice Therapy versus a Long-Term Traditional Voice Therapy.” JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH 62 (3): 611–30. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-18-0013.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Meerschman, Iris, Sofie Claeys, Kim Bettens, Laura Bruneel, Evelien D’haeseleer, and Kristiane Van Lierde. 2019. “Massed versus Spaced Practice in Vocology : Effect of a Short-Term Intensive Voice Therapy versus a Long-Term Traditional Voice Therapy.” JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH 62 (3): 611–630. doi:10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-18-0013.
- Vancouver
- 1.Meerschman I, Claeys S, Bettens K, Bruneel L, D’haeseleer E, Van Lierde K. Massed versus spaced practice in vocology : effect of a short-term intensive voice therapy versus a long-term traditional voice therapy. JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH. 2019;62(3):611–30.
- IEEE
- [1]I. Meerschman, S. Claeys, K. Bettens, L. Bruneel, E. D’haeseleer, and K. Van Lierde, “Massed versus spaced practice in vocology : effect of a short-term intensive voice therapy versus a long-term traditional voice therapy,” JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 611–630, 2019.
@article{8572801, abstract = {{Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of a short-term intensive voice therapy (IVT) with a long-term traditional voice therapy (TVT) on the vocal quality, vocal capacities, psychosocial impact, vocal tract discomfort, laryngological anatomy/physiology, and session attendance of patients with dysphonia. An additional comparison was made between an individual IVT (IVT-I) and a group IVT (IVT-G). Method: A longitudinal, prospective controlled trial was used. Forty-six adults diagnosed with dysphonia were assigned to 1 of the 3 treatment groups. The IVT groups practiced with a frequency of 1 hr 20 min a day and a duration of 2 weeks. The TVT group practiced with a frequency of two 30-min sessions a week and a duration of 6 months. Both therapy programs were content-identical and guided by the same voice therapist. A multidimensional voice assessment consisting of both objective (maximum performance task, aerodynamic measurements, voice range profile, acoustic analysis, multiparametric voice quality indices) and subjective (subject's self-report, auditory-perceptual evaluation, flexible videolaryngostroboscopy) outcomes was used to evaluate the participants' voice. Results: IVT made an equal progress in only 2 weeks and 12 hr of therapy compared with TVT that needed 6 months and 24 hr of therapy. IVT-I and IVT-G showed comparable results. Session attendance was clearly higher in IVT compared with TVT. Long-term follow-up results (1 year) were positive for the 3 groups, except for the self-reported psychosocial impact that increased in the IVT-I group. Conclusions: Short-term IVT is at least equally effective in treating patients with dysphonia as long-term TVT. Group treatment seemed as effective as individual treatment. Attendance and cost-effectiveness are important advantages of IVT. A potential drawback might be an insufficient psychosocial progress. The golden mean between intensive and traditional treatment might therefore be an achievable, effective, and efficient solution for everyday clinical practice.}}, author = {{Meerschman, Iris and Claeys, Sofie and Bettens, Kim and Bruneel, Laura and D'haeseleer, Evelien and Van Lierde, Kristiane}}, issn = {{1092-4388}}, journal = {{JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH}}, keywords = {{DISORDERS,TELEPRACTICE,DELIVERY,INDEX}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{3}}, pages = {{611--630}}, title = {{Massed versus spaced practice in vocology : effect of a short-term intensive voice therapy versus a long-term traditional voice therapy}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-18-0013}}, volume = {{62}}, year = {{2019}}, }
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: