Advanced search
1 file | 556.60 KB Add to list

The decline of infinitival complementation in Ancient Greek : a case of diachronic ambiguity resolution?

Klaas Bentein (UGent)
Author
Organization
Abstract
Several reasons have been proposed for the decline of infinitival complementation in Ancient Greek: the fact that the infinitive became morphologically restricted, the inherent redundancy of the Classical complementation system, and language contact. In this article, I explore yet another reason for the decline of the infinitive: I argue that the system of infinitival complementation became fundamentally ambiguous in its expression in later Greek. As has been noted previously, the loss of the future and perfect tense had a serious impact on the use of infinitival complementation. However, rather than there being an ‘omission’ of temporal distinctions, as previous studies have claimed, I argue that the present and aorist infinitive became polyfunctional, being used for anterior, simultaneous, and posterior events. Next to temporal ambiguity, a second type of ambiguity occurred: ‘modal’ ambiguity or ambiguity with regard to the speech function of the complement clause. Already in Classical times, the present and aorist infinitive could be used after certain verb classes to encode both ‘propositions’ and ‘proposals’ (offers/commands), an ambiguity which continues to be found in later Greek. The study is based on a corpus of documentary texts from the Roman and Byzantine periods (I – VIII AD).
Keywords
temporal ambiguity, modal ambiguity, infinitive, Post-classical and Byzan¬tine Greek, documentary texts

Downloads

  • GL.2018.94.82.pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 556.60 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Bentein, Klaas. “The Decline of Infinitival Complementation in Ancient Greek : A Case of Diachronic Ambiguity Resolution?” GLOTTA-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GRIECHISCHE UND LATEINISCHE SPRACHE, vol. 94, no. 1, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2018, pp. 82–108, doi:10.13109/glot.2018.94.1.82.
APA
Bentein, K. (2018). The decline of infinitival complementation in Ancient Greek : a case of diachronic ambiguity resolution? GLOTTA-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GRIECHISCHE UND LATEINISCHE SPRACHE, 94(1), 82–108. https://doi.org/10.13109/glot.2018.94.1.82
Chicago author-date
Bentein, Klaas. 2018. “The Decline of Infinitival Complementation in Ancient Greek : A Case of Diachronic Ambiguity Resolution?” GLOTTA-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GRIECHISCHE UND LATEINISCHE SPRACHE 94 (1): 82–108. https://doi.org/10.13109/glot.2018.94.1.82.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Bentein, Klaas. 2018. “The Decline of Infinitival Complementation in Ancient Greek : A Case of Diachronic Ambiguity Resolution?” GLOTTA-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GRIECHISCHE UND LATEINISCHE SPRACHE 94 (1): 82–108. doi:10.13109/glot.2018.94.1.82.
Vancouver
1.
Bentein K. The decline of infinitival complementation in Ancient Greek : a case of diachronic ambiguity resolution? GLOTTA-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GRIECHISCHE UND LATEINISCHE SPRACHE. 2018;94(1):82–108.
IEEE
[1]
K. Bentein, “The decline of infinitival complementation in Ancient Greek : a case of diachronic ambiguity resolution?,” GLOTTA-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GRIECHISCHE UND LATEINISCHE SPRACHE, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 82–108, 2018.
@article{8569246,
  abstract     = {{Several reasons have been proposed for the decline of infinitival complementation in Ancient Greek: the fact that the infinitive became morphologically restricted, the inherent redundancy of the Classical complementation system, and language contact. In this article, I explore yet another reason for the decline of the infinitive: I argue that the system of infinitival complementation became fundamentally ambiguous in its expression in later Greek. 

As has been noted previously, the loss of the future and perfect tense had a serious impact on the use of infinitival complementation. However, rather than there being an ‘omission’ of temporal distinctions, as previous studies have claimed, I argue that the present and aorist infinitive became polyfunctional, being used for anterior, simultaneous, and posterior events. Next to temporal ambiguity, a second type of ambiguity occurred: ‘modal’ ambiguity or ambiguity with regard to the speech function of the complement clause. Already in Classical times, the present and aorist infinitive could be used after certain verb classes to encode both ‘propositions’ and ‘proposals’ (offers/commands), an ambiguity which continues to be found in later Greek. The study is based on a corpus of documentary texts from the Roman and Byzantine periods (I – VIII AD).}},
  author       = {{Bentein, Klaas}},
  issn         = {{0017-1298}},
  journal      = {{GLOTTA-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GRIECHISCHE UND LATEINISCHE SPRACHE}},
  keywords     = {{temporal ambiguity,modal ambiguity,infinitive,Post-classical and Byzan¬tine Greek,documentary texts}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  pages        = {{82--108}},
  publisher    = {{Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht}},
  title        = {{The decline of infinitival complementation in Ancient Greek : a case of diachronic ambiguity resolution?}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.13109/glot.2018.94.1.82}},
  volume       = {{94}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: