Giving up on individual justice? : The effect of state non-execution of a pilot judgment on victims
- Author
- Eline Kindt (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- The recent judgment of the ECtHR in Burmych and others v. Ukraine has shed new light on the question of how it regards individual justice in the context of the pilot judgment procedure. Confronted with a State reluctant to execute a previous pilot judgment, the Court has chosen to absorb all similar pending cases in the execution process at the Committee of Ministers. This article examines the pilot judgment procedure from the perspective of the involved applicants and aims to answer the question whether in this context the Court has given up on individual justice all together.
- Keywords
- European Court of Human Rights, European Convention on Human Rights, Committee of Ministers, pilot judgment procedure, subsidiarity, execution of judgments, individual justice, right to individual petition, access to justice, HUMAN-RIGHTS
Downloads
-
(...).pdf
- full text (Published version)
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 203.62 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8567203
- MLA
- Kindt, Eline. “Giving up on Individual Justice? : The Effect of State Non-Execution of a Pilot Judgment on Victims.” NETHERLANDS QUARTERLY OF HUMAN RIGHTS, vol. 36, no. 3, 2018, pp. 173–88, doi:10.1177/0924051918785005.
- APA
- Kindt, E. (2018). Giving up on individual justice? : The effect of state non-execution of a pilot judgment on victims. NETHERLANDS QUARTERLY OF HUMAN RIGHTS, 36(3), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0924051918785005
- Chicago author-date
- Kindt, Eline. 2018. “Giving up on Individual Justice? : The Effect of State Non-Execution of a Pilot Judgment on Victims.” NETHERLANDS QUARTERLY OF HUMAN RIGHTS 36 (3): 173–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0924051918785005.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Kindt, Eline. 2018. “Giving up on Individual Justice? : The Effect of State Non-Execution of a Pilot Judgment on Victims.” NETHERLANDS QUARTERLY OF HUMAN RIGHTS 36 (3): 173–188. doi:10.1177/0924051918785005.
- Vancouver
- 1.Kindt E. Giving up on individual justice? : The effect of state non-execution of a pilot judgment on victims. NETHERLANDS QUARTERLY OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 2018;36(3):173–88.
- IEEE
- [1]E. Kindt, “Giving up on individual justice? : The effect of state non-execution of a pilot judgment on victims,” NETHERLANDS QUARTERLY OF HUMAN RIGHTS, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 173–188, 2018.
@article{8567203,
abstract = {{The recent judgment of the ECtHR in Burmych and others v. Ukraine has shed new light on the question of how it regards individual justice in the context of the pilot judgment procedure. Confronted with a State reluctant to execute a previous pilot judgment, the Court has chosen to absorb all similar pending cases in the execution process at the Committee of Ministers. This article examines the pilot judgment procedure from the perspective of the involved applicants and aims to answer the question whether in this context the Court has given up on individual justice all together.}},
author = {{Kindt, Eline}},
issn = {{0924-0519}},
journal = {{NETHERLANDS QUARTERLY OF HUMAN RIGHTS}},
keywords = {{European Court of Human Rights,European Convention on Human Rights,Committee of Ministers,pilot judgment procedure,subsidiarity,execution of judgments,individual justice,right to individual petition,access to justice,HUMAN-RIGHTS}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{3}},
pages = {{173--188}},
title = {{Giving up on individual justice? : The effect of state non-execution of a pilot judgment on victims}},
url = {{http://doi.org/10.1177/0924051918785005}},
volume = {{36}},
year = {{2018}},
}
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: