Advanced search
1 file | 1.23 MB

Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy in women with pregnancies ending in birth

(2018) PLOS ONE. 13(4).
Author
Organization
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy in women with pregnancies ending in birth. METHODS: A two-phase psychometric evaluation design was set-up. Phase I comprised the translation from English into Dutch and pretesting with 6 women using cognitive interviews. In phase II, the reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the LMUP was assessed in 517 women giving birth recently. Reliability (internal consistency) was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, inter-item correlations, and corrected item-total correlations. Construct validity was assessed using principal components analysis and hypothesis testing. Exploratory Mokken scale analysis was carried out. RESULTS: 517 women aged 15-45 completed the Dutch version of the LMUP. Reliability testing showed acceptable internal consistency (alpha = 0.74, positive inter-item correlations between all items, all corrected item-total correlations >0.20). Validity testing confirmed the unidimensional structure of the scale and all hypotheses were confirmed. The overall Loevinger's H coefficient was 0.57, representing a 'strong' scale. CONCLUSION: The Dutch version of the LMUP is a reliable and valid measure that can be used in the Dutch-speaking population in Belgium to assess pregnancy planning. Future research is necessary to assess the stability of the Dutch version of the LMUP, and to evaluate its psychometric properties in women with abortions.
Keywords
REDUCE UNINTENDED PREGNANCIES, PRECONCEPTION CARE, CONTRACEPTIVE USE, HEALTH OUTCOMES, INTENTION, RECOMMENDATIONS, AMBIVALENCE, PREVALENCE, VALIDATION, FLANDERS

Downloads

  • () 2018 Goossens et al. PLoS One.pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 1.23 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

Chicago
Goossens, Joline, Sofie Verhaeghe, Ann Van Hecke, Geraldine Barrett, Ilse Delbaere, and Dimitri Beeckman. 2018. “Psychometric Properties of the Dutch Version of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy in Women with Pregnancies Ending in Birth.” Plos One 13 (4).
APA
Goossens, Joline, Verhaeghe, S., Van Hecke, A., Barrett, G., Delbaere, I., & Beeckman, D. (2018). Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy in women with pregnancies ending in birth. PLOS ONE, 13(4).
Vancouver
1.
Goossens J, Verhaeghe S, Van Hecke A, Barrett G, Delbaere I, Beeckman D. Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy in women with pregnancies ending in birth. PLOS ONE. 2018;13(4).
MLA
Goossens, Joline et al. “Psychometric Properties of the Dutch Version of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy in Women with Pregnancies Ending in Birth.” PLOS ONE 13.4 (2018): n. pag. Print.
@article{8565126,
  abstract     = {OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy in women with pregnancies ending in birth.
METHODS: A two-phase psychometric evaluation design was set-up. Phase I comprised the translation from English into Dutch and pretesting with 6 women using cognitive interviews. In phase II, the reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the LMUP was assessed in 517 women giving birth recently. Reliability (internal consistency) was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, inter-item correlations, and corrected item-total correlations. Construct validity was assessed using principal components analysis and hypothesis testing. Exploratory Mokken scale analysis was carried out.
RESULTS: 517 women aged 15-45 completed the Dutch version of the LMUP. Reliability testing showed acceptable internal consistency (alpha = 0.74, positive inter-item correlations between all items, all corrected item-total correlations >0.20). Validity testing confirmed the unidimensional structure of the scale and all hypotheses were confirmed. The overall Loevinger's H coefficient was 0.57, representing a 'strong' scale.
CONCLUSION: The Dutch version of the LMUP is a reliable and valid measure that can be used in the Dutch-speaking population in Belgium to assess pregnancy planning. Future research is necessary to assess the stability of the Dutch version of the LMUP, and to evaluate its psychometric properties in women with abortions.},
  articleno    = {e0194033},
  author       = {Goossens, Joline and Verhaeghe, Sofie and Van Hecke, Ann and Barrett, Geraldine and Delbaere, Ilse and Beeckman, Dimitri},
  issn         = {1932-6203},
  journal      = {PLOS ONE},
  keywords     = {REDUCE UNINTENDED PREGNANCIES,PRECONCEPTION CARE,CONTRACEPTIVE USE,HEALTH OUTCOMES,INTENTION,RECOMMENDATIONS,AMBIVALENCE,PREVALENCE,VALIDATION,FLANDERS},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {4},
  pages        = {15},
  title        = {Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy in women with pregnancies ending in birth},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194033},
  volume       = {13},
  year         = {2018},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: