Advanced search
1 file | 301.40 KB Add to list

The role of the reprogramming method and pluripotency state in gamete differentiation from patient-specific human pluripotent stem cells

(2018) MOLECULAR HUMAN REPRODUCTION. 24(4). p.173-184
Author
Organization
Abstract
The derivation of gametes from patient-specific pluripotent stem cells may provide new perspectives for genetic parenthood for patients currently facing sterility. We use current data to assess the gamete differentiation potential of patient-specific pluripotent stem cells and to determine which reprogramming strategy holds the greatest promise for future clinical applications. First, we compare the two best established somatic cell reprogramming strategies: the production of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) and somatic cell nuclear transfer followed by embryonic stem cell derivation (SCNT-ESC). Recent reports have indicated that these stem cells, though displaying a similar pluripotency potential, show important differences at the epigenomic level, which may have repercussions on their applicability. By comparing data on the genetic and epigenetic stability of these cell types during derivation and in-vitro culture, we assess the reprogramming efficiency of both technologies and possible effects on the subsequent differentiation potential of these cells. Moreover, we discuss possible implications of mitochondrial heteroplasmy. We also address the ethical aspects of both cell types, as well as the safety considerations associated with clinical applications using these cells, e.g. the known genomic instability of human PSCs during long-term culture. Secondly, we discuss the role of the stem cell pluripotency state in germ cell differentiation. In mice, success in germ cell development from pluripotent stem cells could only be achieved when starting from a naive state of pluripotency. It remains to be investigated if the naive state is also crucial for germ cell differentiation in human cells and to what extent human naive pluripotency resembles the naive state in mouse.
Keywords
embryonic stem cells, induced pluripotent stem cells, gamete, somatic cell nuclear transfer, genetic, epigenetic, mitochondria, naive pluripotency, primed pluripotency, clinical application, HUMAN SOMATIC-CELLS, HUMAN IPS CELLS, NUCLEAR TRANSFER, IN-VITRO, DNA METHYLATION, CODING MUTATIONS, COPY NUMBER, GERM-CELLS, GENETIC PARENTHOOD, NAIVE PLURIPOTENCY

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 301.40 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Mishra, Swati, et al. “The Role of the Reprogramming Method and Pluripotency State in Gamete Differentiation from Patient-Specific Human Pluripotent Stem Cells.” MOLECULAR HUMAN REPRODUCTION, vol. 24, no. 4, 2018, pp. 173–84, doi:10.1093/molehr/gay007.
APA
Mishra, S., Kacin, E., Stamatiadis, P., Franck, S., Van der Jeught, M., Mertes, H., … Geens, M. (2018). The role of the reprogramming method and pluripotency state in gamete differentiation from patient-specific human pluripotent stem cells. MOLECULAR HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 24(4), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gay007
Chicago author-date
Mishra, Swati, E Kacin, Panagiotis Stamatiadis, S Franck, Margot Van der Jeught, Heidi Mertes, Guido Pennings, et al. 2018. “The Role of the Reprogramming Method and Pluripotency State in Gamete Differentiation from Patient-Specific Human Pluripotent Stem Cells.” MOLECULAR HUMAN REPRODUCTION 24 (4): 173–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gay007.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Mishra, Swati, E Kacin, Panagiotis Stamatiadis, S Franck, Margot Van der Jeught, Heidi Mertes, Guido Pennings, Petra De Sutter, K Sermon, Björn Heindryckx, and M Geens. 2018. “The Role of the Reprogramming Method and Pluripotency State in Gamete Differentiation from Patient-Specific Human Pluripotent Stem Cells.” MOLECULAR HUMAN REPRODUCTION 24 (4): 173–184. doi:10.1093/molehr/gay007.
Vancouver
1.
Mishra S, Kacin E, Stamatiadis P, Franck S, Van der Jeught M, Mertes H, et al. The role of the reprogramming method and pluripotency state in gamete differentiation from patient-specific human pluripotent stem cells. MOLECULAR HUMAN REPRODUCTION. 2018;24(4):173–84.
IEEE
[1]
S. Mishra et al., “The role of the reprogramming method and pluripotency state in gamete differentiation from patient-specific human pluripotent stem cells,” MOLECULAR HUMAN REPRODUCTION, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 173–184, 2018.
@article{8557788,
  abstract     = {{The derivation of gametes from patient-specific pluripotent stem cells may provide new perspectives for genetic parenthood for patients currently facing sterility. We use current data to assess the gamete differentiation potential of patient-specific pluripotent stem cells and to determine which reprogramming strategy holds the greatest promise for future clinical applications. First, we compare the two best established somatic cell reprogramming strategies: the production of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) and somatic cell nuclear transfer followed by embryonic stem cell derivation (SCNT-ESC). Recent reports have indicated that these stem cells, though displaying a similar pluripotency potential, show important differences at the epigenomic level, which may have repercussions on their applicability. By comparing data on the genetic and epigenetic stability of these cell types during derivation and in-vitro culture, we assess the reprogramming efficiency of both technologies and possible effects on the subsequent differentiation potential of these cells. Moreover, we discuss possible implications of mitochondrial heteroplasmy. We also address the ethical aspects of both cell types, as well as the safety considerations associated with clinical applications using these cells, e.g. the known genomic instability of human PSCs during long-term culture. Secondly, we discuss the role of the stem cell pluripotency state in germ cell differentiation. In mice, success in germ cell development from pluripotent stem cells could only be achieved when starting from a naive state of pluripotency. It remains to be investigated if the naive state is also crucial for germ cell differentiation in human cells and to what extent human naive pluripotency resembles the naive state in mouse.}},
  author       = {{Mishra, Swati and Kacin, E and Stamatiadis, Panagiotis and Franck, S and Van der Jeught, Margot and Mertes, Heidi and Pennings, Guido and De Sutter, Petra and Sermon, K and Heindryckx, Björn and Geens, M}},
  issn         = {{1360-9947}},
  journal      = {{MOLECULAR HUMAN REPRODUCTION}},
  keywords     = {{embryonic stem cells,induced pluripotent stem cells,gamete,somatic cell nuclear transfer,genetic,epigenetic,mitochondria,naive pluripotency,primed pluripotency,clinical application,HUMAN SOMATIC-CELLS,HUMAN IPS CELLS,NUCLEAR TRANSFER,IN-VITRO,DNA METHYLATION,CODING MUTATIONS,COPY NUMBER,GERM-CELLS,GENETIC PARENTHOOD,NAIVE PLURIPOTENCY}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{173--184}},
  title        = {{The role of the reprogramming method and pluripotency state in gamete differentiation from patient-specific human pluripotent stem cells}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gay007}},
  volume       = {{24}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: