Advanced search
1 file | 2.82 MB Add to list

The semantics of the aan-construction in 16th-century Dutch : a semasiological and onomasiological approach

Dario Rens (UGent)
Author
Organization
Abstract
This article focuses on the semantics of the Dutch aan-construction NP V NP aan NP], for example, Jan geeft een boek aan Piet ('Jan gives a book to Piet') in the 16th-century. In modern Dutch the aan-construction is used as an alternative to the Dutch double object construction, but previous research suggests that the use of ditransitive verbs in the Dutch aan-construction is only a 16th-century innovation - this alternation is called the 'dative alternation'. However, it is not clear which ditransitive verbs initiated the dative alternation. Colleman (2010) believes that the first instances of the ditransitive use of the aan-construction are concrete physical movements of the direct object from the subject to the indirect object; however, he argues there is no quantitative proof to support those claims. In a self-compiled corpus of 16th-century Dutch, this article tries to find the evidence which is needed to underpin Colleman's hypothesis by making use of the distinctive collexeme analysis and its diachronic variant. The results show that the first ditransitive instances of the aan-construction are indeed concrete uses, but that there is also an increase in the metaphorical use of the construction.
Keywords
DOUBLE OBJECT CONSTRUCTION, ENGLISH, PERSPECTIVE, VERBS

Downloads

  • 1333-7650-1-PB.pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 2.82 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Rens, Dario. “The Semantics of the Aan-Construction in 16th-Century Dutch : A Semasiological and Onomasiological Approach.” LITERATOR-JOURNAL OF LITERARY CRITICISM COMPARATIVE LINGUISTICS AND LITERARY STUDIES, vol. 38, no. 2, Aosis, 2017.
APA
Rens, D. (2017). The semantics of the aan-construction in 16th-century Dutch : a semasiological and onomasiological approach. LITERATOR-JOURNAL OF LITERARY CRITICISM COMPARATIVE LINGUISTICS AND LITERARY STUDIES, 38(2).
Chicago author-date
Rens, Dario. 2017. “The Semantics of the Aan-Construction in 16th-Century Dutch : A Semasiological and Onomasiological Approach.” LITERATOR-JOURNAL OF LITERARY CRITICISM COMPARATIVE LINGUISTICS AND LITERARY STUDIES 38 (2).
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Rens, Dario. 2017. “The Semantics of the Aan-Construction in 16th-Century Dutch : A Semasiological and Onomasiological Approach.” LITERATOR-JOURNAL OF LITERARY CRITICISM COMPARATIVE LINGUISTICS AND LITERARY STUDIES 38 (2).
Vancouver
1.
Rens D. The semantics of the aan-construction in 16th-century Dutch : a semasiological and onomasiological approach. LITERATOR-JOURNAL OF LITERARY CRITICISM COMPARATIVE LINGUISTICS AND LITERARY STUDIES. 2017;38(2).
IEEE
[1]
D. Rens, “The semantics of the aan-construction in 16th-century Dutch : a semasiological and onomasiological approach,” LITERATOR-JOURNAL OF LITERARY CRITICISM COMPARATIVE LINGUISTICS AND LITERARY STUDIES, vol. 38, no. 2, 2017.
@article{8554259,
  abstract     = {This article focuses on the semantics of the Dutch aan-construction NP V NP aan NP], for example, Jan geeft een boek aan Piet ('Jan gives a book to Piet') in the 16th-century. In modern Dutch the aan-construction is used as an alternative to the Dutch double object construction, but previous research suggests that the use of ditransitive verbs in the Dutch aan-construction is only a 16th-century innovation - this alternation is called the 'dative alternation'. However, it is not clear which ditransitive verbs initiated the dative alternation. Colleman (2010) believes that the first instances of the ditransitive use of the aan-construction are concrete physical movements of the direct object from the subject to the indirect object; however, he argues there is no quantitative proof to support those claims. In a self-compiled corpus of 16th-century Dutch, this article tries to find the evidence which is needed to underpin Colleman's hypothesis by making use of the distinctive collexeme analysis and its diachronic variant. The results show that the first ditransitive instances of the aan-construction are indeed concrete uses, but that there is also an increase in the metaphorical use of the construction.},
  articleno    = {a1333},
  author       = {Rens, Dario},
  issn         = {0258-2279},
  journal      = {LITERATOR-JOURNAL OF LITERARY CRITICISM COMPARATIVE LINGUISTICS AND LITERARY STUDIES},
  keywords     = {DOUBLE OBJECT CONSTRUCTION,ENGLISH,PERSPECTIVE,VERBS},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {2},
  pages        = {9},
  publisher    = {Aosis},
  title        = {The semantics of the aan-construction in 16th-century Dutch : a semasiological and onomasiological approach},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/lit.v38i2.1333},
  volume       = {38},
  year         = {2017},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric