Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

Helpers' self-assessment biases before and after helping skills training

Marine Jaeken, Emmanuelle Zech, Celine Brison, Lesley Verhofstadt UGent, Nady Van Broeck and Moira Mikolajczak (2017) FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY. 8.
abstract
Several studies have shown that therapists are generally biased concerning their performed helping skills, as compared to judges' ratings. As clients' ratings of therapists' performance are better predictors of psychotherapy effectiveness than judges' ratings, this study examined the validity and effectiveness of a helping skills training program at reducing novice helpers' self-enhancement biases concerning their helping skills, in comparison to their clients ratings. Helping skills were assessed by three objective measures (a knowledge multiple choice test, a video test and a role play), as well as by a self- and peer-reported questionnaire. In addition, some performed helping skills' correlates (relationship quality, session quality, and helpers' therapeutic attitudes) were assessed both by helpers and their simulated helpees. Seventy-two sophomores in psychology participated to this study, 37 being assigned to a 12-h helping skills training program, and 35 to a control group. Helpers were expected to assess the aforementioned performed helping skills and correlates as being better than their helpees' assessments at pretest, thus revealing a self-enhancement bias. At posttest, we expected that trained helpers would objectively exhibit better helping skills than untrained helpers while beginning to underestimate their performance, thus indexing a self-diminishment bias. In contrast, we hypothesized that untrained helpers would continue to overestimate their performance. Our hypotheses were only partly confirmed but results reflected a skilled-unaware pattern among trainees. Trained helpers went either from a pretest overestimation to a posttest equivalence (performed helping skills and performed therapeutic attitudes), or from a pretest equivalence to a posttest underestimation (performed session quality and performed therapeutic relationship), as compared to helpees' ratings. Results showed that trained helpers improved on all helping skills objective measures and that helpees' perceptions of their performance had increased at posttest. In conclusion, helping skills training leads helpers not only to improve their helping skills but also to have more doubts about their skills, two variables associated with psychotherapy outcome. Keywords: exploration helping skills, helping skillstwo variables associated with psychotherapy outcome.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (original)
publication status
published
keyword
FACILITATIVE INTERPERSONAL SKILLS, COUNSELING COMMUNICATION-SKILLS, PSYCHOTHERAPY, PERCEPTIONS, PREDICTOR, UNAWARE, exploration helping skills, helping skills training, self-diminishment, bias, self-enhancement bias, skilled-unaware pattern
journal title
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
Front. Psychol.
volume
8
article number
1377
pages
13 pages
publisher
Frontiers Media Sa
place of publication
Lausanne
Web of Science type
Article
Web of Science id
000407680800002
ISSN
1664-1078
DOI
10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01377
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A1
id
8554206
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8554206
date created
2018-03-08 16:39:01
date last changed
2018-03-26 07:52:27
@article{8554206,
  abstract     = {Several studies have shown that therapists are generally biased concerning their performed helping skills, as compared to judges' ratings. As clients' ratings of therapists' performance are better predictors of psychotherapy effectiveness than judges' ratings, this study examined the validity and effectiveness of a helping skills training program at reducing novice helpers' self-enhancement biases concerning their helping skills, in comparison to their clients ratings. Helping skills were assessed by three objective measures (a knowledge multiple choice test, a video test and a role play), as well as by a self- and peer-reported questionnaire. In addition, some performed helping skills' correlates (relationship quality, session quality, and helpers' therapeutic attitudes) were assessed both by helpers and their simulated helpees. Seventy-two sophomores in psychology participated to this study, 37 being assigned to a 12-h helping skills training program, and 35 to a control group. Helpers were expected to assess the aforementioned performed helping skills and correlates as being better than their helpees' assessments at pretest, thus revealing a self-enhancement bias. At posttest, we expected that trained helpers would objectively exhibit better helping skills than untrained helpers while beginning to underestimate their performance, thus indexing a self-diminishment bias. In contrast, we hypothesized that untrained helpers would continue to overestimate their performance. Our hypotheses were only partly confirmed but results reflected a skilled-unaware pattern among trainees. Trained helpers went either from a pretest overestimation to a posttest equivalence (performed helping skills and performed therapeutic attitudes), or from a pretest equivalence to a posttest underestimation (performed session quality and performed therapeutic relationship), as compared to helpees' ratings. Results showed that trained helpers improved on all helping skills objective measures and that helpees' perceptions of their performance had increased at posttest. In conclusion, helping skills training leads helpers not only to improve their helping skills but also to have more doubts about their skills, two variables associated with psychotherapy outcome. Keywords: exploration helping skills, helping skillstwo variables associated with psychotherapy outcome.},
  articleno    = {1377},
  author       = {Jaeken, Marine and Zech, Emmanuelle and Brison, Celine and Verhofstadt, Lesley and Van Broeck, Nady and Mikolajczak, Moira},
  issn         = {1664-1078},
  journal      = {FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY},
  keyword      = {FACILITATIVE INTERPERSONAL SKILLS,COUNSELING COMMUNICATION-SKILLS,PSYCHOTHERAPY,PERCEPTIONS,PREDICTOR,UNAWARE,exploration helping skills,helping skills training,self-diminishment,bias,self-enhancement bias,skilled-unaware pattern},
  language     = {eng},
  pages        = {13},
  publisher    = {Frontiers Media Sa},
  title        = {Helpers' self-assessment biases before and after helping skills training},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01377},
  volume       = {8},
  year         = {2017},
}

Chicago
Jaeken, Marine, Emmanuelle Zech, Celine Brison, Lesley Verhofstadt, Nady Van Broeck, and Moira Mikolajczak. 2017. “Helpers’ Self-assessment Biases Before and After Helping Skills Training.” Frontiers in Psychology 8.
APA
Jaeken, Marine, Zech, E., Brison, C., Verhofstadt, L., Van Broeck, N., & Mikolajczak, M. (2017). Helpers’ self-assessment biases before and after helping skills training. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 8.
Vancouver
1.
Jaeken M, Zech E, Brison C, Verhofstadt L, Van Broeck N, Mikolajczak M. Helpers’ self-assessment biases before and after helping skills training. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY. Lausanne: Frontiers Media Sa; 2017;8.
MLA
Jaeken, Marine, Emmanuelle Zech, Celine Brison, et al. “Helpers’ Self-assessment Biases Before and After Helping Skills Training.” FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY 8 (2017): n. pag. Print.