Advanced search
1 file | 7.01 MB Add to list

Comparison of different beneficiation techniques to improve utilization potential of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration fly ash concrete

Author
Organization
Project
Abstract
A large volume of waste is generated in urban areas. Waste treatment techniques are being adopted in developed countries including recycling of wastes (such as paper, plastic, metals, etc.), composting organic waste and incineration of the remaining fraction. Ash generated as a result of incineration processes presently goes mainly into landfill, increasing both land use and resource wastage. Municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) fly ash could alternatively be used as a supplementary cementitious material (SCM) in cement. The major hurdle that currently prevents its use are the expansion of concrete due to elemental aluminium (Al) and also its non-negligible chloride, sulphate, and heavy metal content. Washing with water is the simplest and most effective technique to remove chloride. To prevent Al expansion washing with water and alkali, or washing with a moderate heat treatment were effective. In this research, MSWI fly ash generated in a fluidized bed incinerator was tested in combination with Portland cement. This paper discusses the conducted experiments with varying parameters and the obtained test results in brief.
Keywords
Municipal solid waste incineration ash, pozzolan, elemental aluminium

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 7.01 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Joseph, Aneeta Mary, et al. “Comparison of Different Beneficiation Techniques to Improve Utilization Potential of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Fly Ash Concrete.” Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Constructional Materials and Systems (ICACMS), vol. 2, RILEM Publications S.A.R.L., 2017, pp. 49–54.
APA
Joseph, A. M., Van den Heede, P., Snellings, R., Van Brecht, A., Matthys, S., & De Belie, N. (2017). Comparison of different beneficiation techniques to improve utilization potential of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration fly ash concrete. In Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Constructional Materials and systems (ICACMS) (Vol. 2, pp. 49–54). Chennai, India: RILEM Publications S.A.R.L.
Chicago author-date
Joseph, Aneeta Mary, Philip Van den Heede, Ruben Snellings, Andres Van Brecht, Stijn Matthys, and Nele De Belie. 2017. “Comparison of Different Beneficiation Techniques to Improve Utilization Potential of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Fly Ash Concrete.” In Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Constructional Materials and Systems (ICACMS), 2:49–54. RILEM Publications S.A.R.L.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Joseph, Aneeta Mary, Philip Van den Heede, Ruben Snellings, Andres Van Brecht, Stijn Matthys, and Nele De Belie. 2017. “Comparison of Different Beneficiation Techniques to Improve Utilization Potential of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Fly Ash Concrete.” In Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Constructional Materials and Systems (ICACMS), 2:49–54. RILEM Publications S.A.R.L.
Vancouver
1.
Joseph AM, Van den Heede P, Snellings R, Van Brecht A, Matthys S, De Belie N. Comparison of different beneficiation techniques to improve utilization potential of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration fly ash concrete. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Constructional Materials and systems (ICACMS). RILEM Publications S.A.R.L.; 2017. p. 49–54.
IEEE
[1]
A. M. Joseph, P. Van den Heede, R. Snellings, A. Van Brecht, S. Matthys, and N. De Belie, “Comparison of different beneficiation techniques to improve utilization potential of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration fly ash concrete,” in Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Constructional Materials and systems (ICACMS), Chennai, India, 2017, vol. 2, pp. 49–54.
@inproceedings{8552415,
  abstract     = {{A large volume of waste is generated in urban areas. Waste treatment techniques are being adopted in developed countries including recycling of wastes (such as paper, plastic, metals, etc.), composting organic waste and incineration of the remaining fraction. Ash generated as a result of incineration processes presently goes mainly into landfill, increasing both land use and resource wastage. Municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) fly ash could alternatively be used as a supplementary cementitious material (SCM) in cement. The major hurdle that currently prevents its use are the expansion of concrete due to elemental aluminium (Al) and also its non-negligible chloride, sulphate, and heavy metal content. Washing with water is the simplest and most effective technique to remove chloride. To prevent Al expansion washing with water and alkali, or washing with a moderate heat treatment were effective. In this research, MSWI fly ash generated in a fluidized bed incinerator was tested in combination with Portland cement. This paper discusses the conducted experiments with varying parameters and the obtained test results in brief.}},
  author       = {{Joseph, Aneeta Mary and Van den Heede, Philip and Snellings, Ruben and Van Brecht, Andres and Matthys, Stijn and De Belie, Nele}},
  booktitle    = {{Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Constructional Materials and systems (ICACMS)}},
  isbn         = {{978-2-35158-194-0}},
  keywords     = {{Municipal solid waste incineration ash,pozzolan,elemental aluminium}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  location     = {{Chennai, India}},
  pages        = {{49--54}},
  publisher    = {{RILEM Publications S.A.R.L.}},
  title        = {{Comparison of different beneficiation techniques to improve utilization potential of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration fly ash concrete}},
  volume       = {{2}},
  year         = {{2017}},
}