Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

Clinical validation of three short forms of the Dutch Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition (WMS-IV-NL) in a mixed clinical sample

Zita Bouman, Marc PH Hendriks, William M Van der Veld, Albert Aldenkamp and Roy PC Kessels (2016) ASSESSMENT. 23(3). p.386-394
abstract
The reliability and validity of three short forms of the Dutch version of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition (WMS-IV-NL) were evaluated in a mixed clinical sample of 235 patients. The short forms were based on the WMS-IV Flexible Approach, that is, a 3-subtest combination (Older Adult Battery for Adults) and two 2-subtest combinations (Logical Memory and Visual Reproduction and Logical Memory and Designs), which can be used to estimate the Immediate, Delayed, Auditory and Visual Memory Indices. All short forms showed good reliability coefficients. As expected, for adults (16-69 years old) the 3-subtest short form was consistently more accurate (predictive accuracy ranged from 73% to 100%) than both 2-subtest short forms (range = 61%-80%). Furthermore, for older adults (65-90 years old), the predictive accuracy of the 2-subtest short form ranged from 75% to 100%. These results suggest that caution is warranted when using the WMS-IV-NL Flexible Approach short forms to estimate all four indices.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
journalArticle (original)
publication status
published
subject
keyword
PARSIMONIOUS PREDICTION, CROSS-VALIDATION, SCORES IMMEDIATE, REVISED, SCORES, DELAYED MEMORY, INDEX SCORES, 2-SUBTEST, TESTS, neuropsychology, neuropsychological assessment, episodic memory, test, battery, prediction, Wechsler, WMS-IV Flexible Approach
journal title
ASSESSMENT
Assessment
volume
23
issue
3
pages
386 - 394
Web of Science type
Article
Web of Science id
000375709500010
JCR category
PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
JCR impact factor
3.062 (2016)
JCR rank
22/121 (2016)
JCR quartile
1 (2016)
ISSN
1073-1911
1552-3489
DOI
10.1177/1073191115593629
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
A1
copyright statement
I have transferred the copyright for this publication to the publisher
id
8551710
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8551710
date created
2018-02-23 12:06:40
date last changed
2018-05-15 11:31:42
@article{8551710,
  abstract     = {The reliability and validity of three short forms of the Dutch version of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition (WMS-IV-NL) were evaluated in a mixed clinical sample of 235 patients. The short forms were based on the WMS-IV Flexible Approach, that is, a 3-subtest combination (Older Adult Battery for Adults) and two 2-subtest combinations (Logical Memory and Visual Reproduction and Logical Memory and Designs), which can be used to estimate the Immediate, Delayed, Auditory and Visual Memory Indices. All short forms showed good reliability coefficients. As expected, for adults (16-69 years old) the 3-subtest short form was consistently more accurate (predictive accuracy ranged from 73\% to 100\%) than both 2-subtest short forms (range = 61\%-80\%). Furthermore, for older adults (65-90 years old), the predictive accuracy of the 2-subtest short form ranged from 75\% to 100\%. These results suggest that caution is warranted when using the WMS-IV-NL Flexible Approach short forms to estimate all four indices.},
  author       = {Bouman, Zita and Hendriks, Marc PH and Van der Veld, William M and Aldenkamp, Albert and Kessels, Roy PC},
  issn         = {1073-1911},
  journal      = {ASSESSMENT},
  keyword      = {PARSIMONIOUS PREDICTION,CROSS-VALIDATION,SCORES IMMEDIATE,REVISED,SCORES,DELAYED MEMORY,INDEX SCORES,2-SUBTEST,TESTS,neuropsychology,neuropsychological assessment,episodic memory,test,battery,prediction,Wechsler,WMS-IV Flexible Approach},
  language     = {eng},
  number       = {3},
  pages        = {386--394},
  title        = {Clinical validation of three short forms of the Dutch Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition (WMS-IV-NL) in a mixed clinical sample},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191115593629},
  volume       = {23},
  year         = {2016},
}

Chicago
Bouman, Zita, Marc PH Hendriks, William M Van der Veld, Albert Aldenkamp, and Roy PC Kessels. 2016. “Clinical Validation of Three Short Forms of the Dutch Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition (WMS-IV-NL) in a Mixed Clinical Sample.” Assessment 23 (3): 386–394.
APA
Bouman, Z., Hendriks, M. P., Van der Veld, W. M., Aldenkamp, A., & Kessels, R. P. (2016). Clinical validation of three short forms of the Dutch Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition (WMS-IV-NL) in a mixed clinical sample. ASSESSMENT, 23(3), 386–394.
Vancouver
1.
Bouman Z, Hendriks MP, Van der Veld WM, Aldenkamp A, Kessels RP. Clinical validation of three short forms of the Dutch Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition (WMS-IV-NL) in a mixed clinical sample. ASSESSMENT. 2016;23(3):386–94.
MLA
Bouman, Zita, Marc PH Hendriks, William M Van der Veld, et al. “Clinical Validation of Three Short Forms of the Dutch Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition (WMS-IV-NL) in a Mixed Clinical Sample.” ASSESSMENT 23.3 (2016): 386–394. Print.