Attitudes of European geneticists regarding expanded carrier screening
- Author
- Sandra Janssens (UGent) , Davit Chokoshvili, Danya Vears, Anne De Paepe (UGent) and Pascal Borry
- Organization
- Abstract
- Objective: To explore attitudes of clinical and molecular geneticists about the implementation of multi-disease or expanded carrier screening (ECS) for monogenic recessive disorders. Design: Qualitative; semistructured interviews. Setting: In person or via Skype. Interviews were audiorecorded and transcribed verbatim. Participants: European clinical and molecular geneticists with expertise in carrier screening (N = 16). Methods: Inductive content analysis was used to identify common content categories in the data. Results: Participants recognized important benefits of ECS, but they also identified major challenges, including limited benefit of ECS for most couples in the general population, lack of knowledge on carrier screening among nongenetic health care providers and the general public, potential negative implications of ECS for society, and limited economic resources. Participants favored an evidence-based approach to the implementation of population-wide ECS and were reluctant to actively offer ECS in the absence of demonstrable benefits. However, there was a consensus among the participants that ECS should be made available to couples who request the test. In addition, they believed ECS could be routinely offered to all people who use assisted reproduction. Conclusion: Although a limited ECS offer is practical, it also raises concerns over equality in access to screening. A comprehensive risk-benefit analysis is needed to determine the desirability of systematic population-wide ECS.
- Keywords
- GYNECOLOGISTS, OBSTETRICIANS, POPULATION, DISEASE, IMPLEMENTATION, DISORDERS, OPINIONS, attitudes, carrier screening, ethics, qualitative research, recessive, disorders
Downloads
-
(...).pdf
- full text
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 212.52 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8551689
- MLA
- Janssens, Sandra, et al. “Attitudes of European Geneticists Regarding Expanded Carrier Screening.” JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, vol. 46, no. 1, 2017, pp. 63–71, doi:10.1016/j.jogn.2016.08.012.
- APA
- Janssens, S., Chokoshvili, D., Vears, D., De Paepe, A., & Borry, P. (2017). Attitudes of European geneticists regarding expanded carrier screening. JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 46(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2016.08.012
- Chicago author-date
- Janssens, Sandra, Davit Chokoshvili, Danya Vears, Anne De Paepe, and Pascal Borry. 2017. “Attitudes of European Geneticists Regarding Expanded Carrier Screening.” JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING 46 (1): 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2016.08.012.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Janssens, Sandra, Davit Chokoshvili, Danya Vears, Anne De Paepe, and Pascal Borry. 2017. “Attitudes of European Geneticists Regarding Expanded Carrier Screening.” JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING 46 (1): 63–71. doi:10.1016/j.jogn.2016.08.012.
- Vancouver
- 1.Janssens S, Chokoshvili D, Vears D, De Paepe A, Borry P. Attitudes of European geneticists regarding expanded carrier screening. JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING. 2017;46(1):63–71.
- IEEE
- [1]S. Janssens, D. Chokoshvili, D. Vears, A. De Paepe, and P. Borry, “Attitudes of European geneticists regarding expanded carrier screening,” JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 63–71, 2017.
@article{8551689,
abstract = {{Objective: To explore attitudes of clinical and molecular geneticists about the implementation of multi-disease or expanded carrier screening (ECS) for monogenic recessive disorders.
Design: Qualitative; semistructured interviews.
Setting: In person or via Skype. Interviews were audiorecorded and transcribed verbatim.
Participants: European clinical and molecular geneticists with expertise in carrier screening (N = 16).
Methods: Inductive content analysis was used to identify common content categories in the data.
Results: Participants recognized important benefits of ECS, but they also identified major challenges, including limited benefit of ECS for most couples in the general population, lack of knowledge on carrier screening among nongenetic health care providers and the general public, potential negative implications of ECS for society, and limited economic resources. Participants favored an evidence-based approach to the implementation of population-wide ECS and were reluctant to actively offer ECS in the absence of demonstrable benefits. However, there was a consensus among the participants that ECS should be made available to couples who request the test. In addition, they believed ECS could be routinely offered to all people who use assisted reproduction.
Conclusion: Although a limited ECS offer is practical, it also raises concerns over equality in access to screening. A comprehensive risk-benefit analysis is needed to determine the desirability of systematic population-wide ECS.}},
author = {{Janssens, Sandra and Chokoshvili, Davit and Vears, Danya and De Paepe, Anne and Borry, Pascal}},
issn = {{0884-2175}},
journal = {{JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING}},
keywords = {{GYNECOLOGISTS,OBSTETRICIANS,POPULATION,DISEASE,IMPLEMENTATION,DISORDERS,OPINIONS,attitudes,carrier screening,ethics,qualitative research,recessive,disorders}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{1}},
pages = {{63--71}},
title = {{Attitudes of European geneticists regarding expanded carrier screening}},
url = {{http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2016.08.012}},
volume = {{46}},
year = {{2017}},
}
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: