- Author
- Haydee Artaza, Neil Chue Hong, Manuel Corpas, Angel Corpuz, Rob Hooft, Rafael C Jiménez, Brane Leskošek, Brett G Olivier, Jan Stourac, Radka Svobodová Vařeková, Thomas Van Parys (UGent) and Daniel Vaughan
- Organization
- Abstract
- Metrics for assessing adoption of good development practices are a useful way to ensure that software is sustainable, reusable and functional. Sustainability means that the software used today will be available - and continue to be improved and supported - in the future. We report here an initial set of metrics that measure good practices in software development. This initiative differs from previously developed efforts in being a community-driven grassroots approach where experts from different organisations propose good software practices that have reasonable potential to be adopted by the communities they represent. We not only focus our efforts on understanding and prioritising good practices, we assess their feasibility for implementation and publish them here.
Downloads
-
4c35c243-fa82-4447-a0b2-8f22ae7daf6f 9206 - Manuel Corpas.pdf
- full text
- |
- open access
- |
- |
- 860.85 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8549673
- MLA
- Artaza, Haydee, Neil Chue Hong, Manuel Corpas, et al. “Top 10 Metrics for Life Science Software Good Practices.” F1000RESEARCH 5 (2016): n. pag. Print.
- APA
- Artaza, H., Chue Hong, N., Corpas, M., Corpuz, A., Hooft, R., Jiménez, R. C., Leskošek, B., et al. (2016). Top 10 metrics for life science software good practices. F1000RESEARCH, 5.
- Chicago author-date
- Artaza, Haydee, Neil Chue Hong, Manuel Corpas, Angel Corpuz, Rob Hooft, Rafael C Jiménez, Brane Leskošek, et al. 2016. “Top 10 Metrics for Life Science Software Good Practices.” F1000RESEARCH 5.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Artaza, Haydee, Neil Chue Hong, Manuel Corpas, Angel Corpuz, Rob Hooft, Rafael C Jiménez, Brane Leskošek, Brett G Olivier, Jan Stourac, Radka Svobodová Vařeková, Thomas Van Parys, and Daniel Vaughan. 2016. “Top 10 Metrics for Life Science Software Good Practices.” F1000RESEARCH 5.
- Vancouver
- 1.Artaza H, Chue Hong N, Corpas M, Corpuz A, Hooft R, Jiménez RC, et al. Top 10 metrics for life science software good practices. F1000RESEARCH. 2016;5.
- IEEE
- [1]H. Artaza et al., “Top 10 metrics for life science software good practices,” F1000RESEARCH, vol. 5, 2016.
@article{8549673,
abstract = {{Metrics for assessing adoption of good development practices are a useful way to ensure that software is sustainable, reusable and functional. Sustainability means that the software used today will be available - and continue to be improved and supported - in the future.
We report here an initial set of metrics that measure good practices in software development. This initiative differs from previously developed efforts in being a community-driven grassroots approach where experts from different organisations propose good software practices that have reasonable potential to be adopted by the communities they represent. We not only focus our efforts on understanding and prioritising good practices, we assess their feasibility for implementation and publish them here.}},
articleno = {{2000}},
author = {{Artaza, Haydee and Chue Hong, Neil and Corpas, Manuel and Corpuz, Angel and Hooft, Rob and Jiménez, Rafael C and Leskošek, Brane and Olivier, Brett G and Stourac, Jan and Svobodová Vařeková, Radka and Van Parys, Thomas and Vaughan, Daniel}},
issn = {{2046-1402}},
journal = {{F1000RESEARCH}},
language = {{eng}},
pages = {{9}},
title = {{Top 10 metrics for life science software good practices}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.9206.1}},
volume = {{5}},
year = {{2016}},
}
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric