Advanced search
1 file | 722.95 KB Add to list

Between the shells : the production of Belgian, British and French trench journals in the First World War

Cedric Van Dijck (UGent) , Marysa Demoor (UGent) and Sarah Posman (UGent)
(2017) PUBLISHING HISTORY. 77. p.67-89
Author
Organization
Project
Modernism at the Front: Modernist Temporality in British War Journals and Magazines, 1914-1918
Abstract
This comparative essay focuses on a small set of representative publications created on the Western front, including the Wipers Times (British army), Bellica, Le Bochofage and Le Poilu du 6-9 (French army) and Antwerpen en Omheining, Ik ben Roeland and Saint-Trond Poilufié (Belgian army). First, it explores the production context of Entente magazines. That little presses were established against the odds of warfare fascinated the contemporary public: the French avant-garde poet Guillaume Apollinaire, for instance, contributed a short anecdotal essay entitled “L’Histoire d’une gazette du front” to the Mercure de France in January 1917. The essay then goes on to profile the editors, readers and contributors involved, and shows how a comparative approach can complement what we already know of the ostensibly limited distribution and scope of the trench press. Finally, it asks how trench journals fit into the framework of periodical studies, arguing for their textual affinity with school magazines. The trench press has exclusively been read and studied by historians, who consider it a phenomenon distinctive of the cultural history of the First World War. The benefit of situating these magazines firmly within contemporary print culture is that it nuances that notion of exceptionality. It also provides a space for addressing some of the confusions in definition and categorisation that underlie much historical analysis.
Keywords
World War One, literature, modernism

Downloads

  • Between the Shells sp cvd-1.pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 722.95 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Van Dijck, Cedric, Marysa Demoor, and Sarah Posman. “Between the Shells : the Production of Belgian, British and French Trench Journals in the First World War.” PUBLISHING HISTORY 77 (2017): 67–89. Print.
APA
Van Dijck, C., Demoor, M., & Posman, S. (2017). Between the shells : the production of Belgian, British and French trench journals in the First World War. PUBLISHING HISTORY, 77, 67–89.
Chicago author-date
Van Dijck, Cedric, Marysa Demoor, and Sarah Posman. 2017. “Between the Shells : the Production of Belgian, British and French Trench Journals in the First World War.” Publishing History 77: 67–89.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Van Dijck, Cedric, Marysa Demoor, and Sarah Posman. 2017. “Between the Shells : the Production of Belgian, British and French Trench Journals in the First World War.” Publishing History 77: 67–89.
Vancouver
1.
Van Dijck C, Demoor M, Posman S. Between the shells : the production of Belgian, British and French trench journals in the First World War. PUBLISHING HISTORY. 2017;77:67–89.
IEEE
[1]
C. Van Dijck, M. Demoor, and S. Posman, “Between the shells : the production of Belgian, British and French trench journals in the First World War,” PUBLISHING HISTORY, vol. 77, pp. 67–89, 2017.
@article{8549280,
  abstract     = {This comparative essay focuses on a small set of representative publications created on the Western front, including the Wipers Times (British army), Bellica, Le Bochofage and Le Poilu du 6-9 (French army) and Antwerpen en Omheining, Ik ben Roeland and Saint-Trond Poilufié (Belgian army).  First, it explores the production context of Entente magazines. That little presses were established against the odds of warfare fascinated the contemporary public: the French avant-garde poet Guillaume Apollinaire, for instance, contributed a short anecdotal essay entitled “L’Histoire d’une gazette du front” to the Mercure de France in January 1917. The essay then goes on to profile the editors, readers and contributors involved, and shows how a comparative approach can complement what we already know of the ostensibly limited distribution and scope of the trench press. Finally, it asks how trench journals fit into the framework of periodical studies, arguing for their textual affinity with school magazines. The trench press has exclusively been read and studied by historians, who consider it a phenomenon distinctive of the cultural history of the First World War. The benefit of situating these magazines firmly within contemporary print culture is that it nuances that notion of exceptionality. It also provides a space for addressing some of the confusions in definition and categorisation that underlie much historical analysis. 
},
  author       = {Van Dijck, Cedric and Demoor, Marysa and Posman, Sarah},
  issn         = {0309-2445},
  journal      = {PUBLISHING HISTORY},
  keywords     = {World War  One,literature,modernism},
  language     = {eng},
  pages        = {67--89},
  title        = {Between the shells : the production of Belgian, British and French trench journals in the First World War},
  volume       = {77},
  year         = {2017},
}

Web of Science
Times cited: