Advanced search
1 file | 1.23 MB Add to list

Quantifying the uncertainty of a model-reconstructed soilscape for archaeological land evaluation

Peter Finke (UGent) , A Jafari, Ann Zwertvaegher (UGent) and Olivier Thas (UGent)
(2018) GEODERMA. 320. p.74-81
Author
Organization
Abstract
Models can serve as temporal interpolators for landscape reconstruction, and geostatistical interpolation can assist in obtaining full-cover maps. Both activities are associated with uncertainty. We applied a hydrological model (MODFLOW), a soil development model (SoilGen) and regression kriging to reconstruct a Middle Bronze Age landscape. This reconstruction comprises maps of a set of land characteristics and is input for a land evaluation meant to explain low occupancy during this period. The land evaluation showed marginal suitability in 81% of the area for Bronze Age land utilization types, which explains the low occupancy. We evaluated the effects of model accuracy and interpolation accuracy on the uncertainty of the land evaluation, assuming no uncertainty about the land evaluation protocol. The effect of model (in)accuracy was assessed by generating 100 perturbations using a variance-covariance error matrix filled using independent measurements from 1953 CE. The effect of spatial interpolation errors was assessed by generating 100 realizations of the land characteristics by Sequential Gaussian Simulation. Results show that uncertainty contributions of the model errors and interpolation errors are similar in terms of entropy H' between land evaluation maps (fairly low H' of 0.47 and 0.38 for model and interpolation error respectively). Model-reconstructed land characteristics led to fairly reliable land evaluations. Priority improvements for the model were identified and ranked. Most improvements come at high computational cost.
Keywords
Model accuracy, Spatial accuracy, Land evaluation, Soilscape reconstruction, Uncertainty, FLANDERS, BELGIUM

Downloads

  • (...).pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • UGent only
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 1.23 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Finke, Peter et al. “Quantifying the Uncertainty of a Model-reconstructed Soilscape for Archaeological Land Evaluation.” GEODERMA 320 (2018): 74–81. Print.
APA
Finke, P., Jafari, A., Zwertvaegher, A., & Thas, O. (2018). Quantifying the uncertainty of a model-reconstructed soilscape for archaeological land evaluation. GEODERMA, 320, 74–81.
Chicago author-date
Finke, Peter, A Jafari, Ann Zwertvaegher, and Olivier Thas. 2018. “Quantifying the Uncertainty of a Model-reconstructed Soilscape for Archaeological Land Evaluation.” Geoderma 320: 74–81.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Finke, Peter, A Jafari, Ann Zwertvaegher, and Olivier Thas. 2018. “Quantifying the Uncertainty of a Model-reconstructed Soilscape for Archaeological Land Evaluation.” Geoderma 320: 74–81.
Vancouver
1.
Finke P, Jafari A, Zwertvaegher A, Thas O. Quantifying the uncertainty of a model-reconstructed soilscape for archaeological land evaluation. GEODERMA. 2018;320:74–81.
IEEE
[1]
P. Finke, A. Jafari, A. Zwertvaegher, and O. Thas, “Quantifying the uncertainty of a model-reconstructed soilscape for archaeological land evaluation,” GEODERMA, vol. 320, pp. 74–81, 2018.
@article{8547737,
  abstract     = {Models can serve as temporal interpolators for landscape reconstruction, and geostatistical interpolation can assist in obtaining full-cover maps. Both activities are associated with uncertainty. We applied a hydrological model (MODFLOW), a soil development model (SoilGen) and regression kriging to reconstruct a Middle Bronze Age landscape. This reconstruction comprises maps of a set of land characteristics and is input for a land evaluation meant to explain low occupancy during this period. The land evaluation showed marginal suitability in 81% of the area for Bronze Age land utilization types, which explains the low occupancy. We evaluated the effects of model accuracy and interpolation accuracy on the uncertainty of the land evaluation, assuming no uncertainty about the land evaluation protocol. The effect of model (in)accuracy was assessed by generating 100 perturbations using a variance-covariance error matrix filled using independent measurements from 1953 CE. The effect of spatial interpolation errors was assessed by generating 100 realizations of the land characteristics by Sequential Gaussian Simulation. Results show that uncertainty contributions of the model errors and interpolation errors are similar in terms of entropy H' between land evaluation maps (fairly low H' of 0.47 and 0.38 for model and interpolation error respectively). Model-reconstructed land characteristics led to fairly reliable land evaluations. Priority improvements for the model were identified and ranked. Most improvements come at high computational cost.},
  author       = {Finke, Peter and Jafari, A and Zwertvaegher, Ann and Thas, Olivier},
  issn         = {0016-7061},
  journal      = {GEODERMA},
  keywords     = {Model accuracy,Spatial accuracy,Land evaluation,Soilscape reconstruction,Uncertainty,FLANDERS,BELGIUM},
  language     = {eng},
  pages        = {74--81},
  title        = {Quantifying the uncertainty of a model-reconstructed soilscape for archaeological land evaluation},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.01.032},
  volume       = {320},
  year         = {2018},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: