- Author
- Karen Gorissen (UGent) and Bert Weijters (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- The current research introduces the negative footprint illusion: Although adding a green to a non-green food product necessarily increases total environmental impact (footprint), consumers will sometimes erroneously estimate the total environmental impact of the combination of the green and non-green product lower than the same non-green product alone. The negative footprint effect is demonstrated in two between-subjects survey experiments among consumers responsible for purchases in their household (N = 536, N = 580), is partially supported in a student sample (N = 219), but does not show up in a within-subject experiment (N = 477). Our findings contribute to the understanding of how consumers deal with environmental impact information and how such information can be subject to biased processing.
- Keywords
- Negative footprint illusion, Perceputal bias, green consumption, eco-labels, organic food
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8544119
- MLA
- Gorissen, Karen, and Bert Weijters. The Negative Footprint Illusion: Perceptual Bias in Sustainable Food Consumption. 2016.
- APA
- Gorissen, K., & Weijters, B. (2016). The negative footprint illusion: Perceptual bias in sustainable food consumption. Presented at the 45th EMAC Annual Conference 2016, Oslo.
- Chicago author-date
- Gorissen, Karen, and Bert Weijters. 2016. “The Negative Footprint Illusion: Perceptual Bias in Sustainable Food Consumption.” In .
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Gorissen, Karen, and Bert Weijters. 2016. “The Negative Footprint Illusion: Perceptual Bias in Sustainable Food Consumption.” In .
- Vancouver
- 1.Gorissen K, Weijters B. The negative footprint illusion: Perceptual bias in sustainable food consumption. In 2016.
- IEEE
- [1]K. Gorissen and B. Weijters, “The negative footprint illusion: Perceptual bias in sustainable food consumption,” presented at the 45th EMAC Annual Conference 2016, Oslo, 2016.
@inproceedings{8544119, abstract = {{The current research introduces the negative footprint illusion: Although adding a green to a non-green food product necessarily increases total environmental impact (footprint), consumers will sometimes erroneously estimate the total environmental impact of the combination of the green and non-green product lower than the same non-green product alone. The negative footprint effect is demonstrated in two between-subjects survey experiments among consumers responsible for purchases in their household (N = 536, N = 580), is partially supported in a student sample (N = 219), but does not show up in a within-subject experiment (N = 477). Our findings contribute to the understanding of how consumers deal with environmental impact information and how such information can be subject to biased processing.}}, author = {{Gorissen, Karen and Weijters, Bert}}, keywords = {{Negative footprint illusion,Perceputal bias,green consumption,eco-labels,organic food}}, language = {{und}}, location = {{Oslo}}, title = {{The negative footprint illusion: Perceptual bias in sustainable food consumption}}, year = {{2016}}, }