Ghent University Academic Bibliography

Advanced

Procedural review in European fundamental rights cases : introduction

Janneke Gerards and Eva Brems UGent (2017) Procedural review in European fundamental rights cases. p.1-16
abstract
The analyses provided in this volume show at once the potential and the limitations of procedural review as a suitable approach for European Courts having to decide on fundamental rights cases. The question arises as to what form of procedural review would be the most appropriate for the European Courts to apply. The comparative analysis of case law shows that a great variety of approaches can be conceived. Hence there is no straightforward and easy answer to the main research question of this book, which is to what extent and how the 'argument from procedure' can be used in fundamental rights case law of the European Courts in a legitimate and practical manner.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
year
type
bookChapter
publication status
published
subject
keyword
Human Rights - Europe, procedural review, fundamental rights cases
book title
Procedural review in European fundamental rights cases
editor
Janneke Gerards and Eva Brems UGent
pages
17 pages
publisher
Cambridge University Press
place of publication
Cambridge
conference name
Expert Seminar on Procedural Review
conference organizer
HRC Ghent University and Radboud University
conference location
Ghent
conference start
2015-05-21
conference end
2015-05-22
ISBN
9781107183773
language
English
UGent publication?
yes
classification
B2
copyright statement
I don't know the status of the copyright for this publication
id
8517489
handle
http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8517489
date created
2017-04-11 14:10:51
date last changed
2017-05-05 07:51:34
@incollection{8517489,
  abstract     = {The analyses provided in this volume show at once the potential and the limitations of procedural review as a suitable approach for European Courts having to decide on fundamental rights cases. The question arises as to what form of procedural review would be the most appropriate for the European Courts to apply. The comparative analysis of case law shows that a great variety of approaches can be conceived. Hence there is no straightforward and easy answer to the main research question of this book, which is to what extent and how the 'argument from procedure' can be used in fundamental rights case law of the European Courts in a legitimate and practical manner.},
  author       = {Gerards, Janneke and Brems, Eva},
  booktitle    = {Procedural review in European fundamental rights cases},
  editor       = {Gerards, Janneke and Brems, Eva},
  isbn         = {9781107183773},
  keyword      = {Human Rights - Europe,procedural review,fundamental rights cases},
  language     = {eng},
  location     = {Ghent},
  pages        = {1--16},
  publisher    = {Cambridge University Press},
  title        = {Procedural review in European fundamental rights cases : introduction},
  year         = {2017},
}

Chicago
Gerards, Janneke, and Eva Brems. 2017. “Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases : Introduction.” In Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases, ed. Janneke Gerards and Eva Brems, 1–16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
APA
Gerards, Janneke, & Brems, E. (2017). Procedural review in European fundamental rights cases : introduction. In Janneke Gerards & E. Brems (Eds.), Procedural review in European fundamental rights cases (pp. 1–16). Presented at the Expert Seminar on Procedural Review, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vancouver
1.
Gerards J, Brems E. Procedural review in European fundamental rights cases : introduction. In: Gerards J, Brems E, editors. Procedural review in European fundamental rights cases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017. p. 1–16.
MLA
Gerards, Janneke, and Eva Brems. “Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases : Introduction.” Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases. Ed. Janneke Gerards & Eva Brems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017. 1–16. Print.