@misc{8515046,
  abstract     = {{Kuss and colleagues’ paper ‘Chaos and confusion in DSM-5 diagnosis of Internet Gaming Disorder’ sets out to examine issues relating to the concept. We agree that there are serious issues and extend their arguments by suggesting that the field lacks basic theory, definitions, patient research, and properly validated and standardized assessment tools. As most studies derive data from survey research in functional populations, they exclude people with severe functional impairment and provide only limited information on the hypothesized disorder. Yet findings from such studies are widely used and often exaggerated, leading many to believe that we know more about the problem behavior than we do. We further argue that video game play is associated with several benefits and that formalizing this popular hobby as a psychiatric disorder is not without risks. It might undermine children's right to play or encourage repressive treatment programs, which ultimately threaten children’s right to protection against violence. While Kuss and colleagues express support for the formal implementation of a disorder, we argue that before we have a proper evidence base, a sound theory, and validated assessment tools, it is irresponsible to support a formal category of disorder and doing so would solidify a confirmatory approach to research in this area.}},
  author       = {{van Rooij, Tony and Kardefelt-Winther, Daniel}},
  issn         = {{2062-5871}},
  keywords     = {{gaming disorder,ICD-11,DSM-5,diagnosis,survey data,clinical data}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{128--132}},
  publisher    = {{Akademiai Kiado}},
  series       = {{JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL ADDICTIONS}},
  title        = {{Lost in the chaos : flawed literature should not generate new disorders}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1556/2006.6.2017.015}},
  volume       = {{6}},
  year         = {{2017}},
}

Altmetric

View in Altmetric

Web of Science

Times cited: