The difference in use between the active and middle forms of phi eta mu i in speech conslusions in homer
- Author
- Filip De Decker (UGent)
- Organization
Downloads
-
(...).pdf
- full text
- |
- UGent only
- |
- |
- 757.79 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8512445
- MLA
- De Decker, Filip. “The Difference in Use between the Active and Middle Forms of Phi Eta Mu i in Speech Conslusions in Homer.” LISTY FILOLOGICKE, vol. 140, no. 1–2, 2017, pp. 7–37.
- APA
- De Decker, F. (2017). The difference in use between the active and middle forms of phi eta mu i in speech conslusions in homer. LISTY FILOLOGICKE, 140(1–2), 7–37.
- Chicago author-date
- De Decker, Filip. 2017. “The Difference in Use between the Active and Middle Forms of Phi Eta Mu i in Speech Conslusions in Homer.” LISTY FILOLOGICKE 140 (1–2): 7–37.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- De Decker, Filip. 2017. “The Difference in Use between the Active and Middle Forms of Phi Eta Mu i in Speech Conslusions in Homer.” LISTY FILOLOGICKE 140 (1–2): 7–37.
- Vancouver
- 1.De Decker F. The difference in use between the active and middle forms of phi eta mu i in speech conslusions in homer. LISTY FILOLOGICKE. 2017;140(1–2):7–37.
- IEEE
- [1]F. De Decker, “The difference in use between the active and middle forms of phi eta mu i in speech conslusions in homer,” LISTY FILOLOGICKE, vol. 140, no. 1–2, pp. 7–37, 2017.
@article{8512445,
author = {{De Decker, Filip}},
issn = {{0024-4457}},
journal = {{LISTY FILOLOGICKE}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{1-2}},
pages = {{7--37}},
title = {{The difference in use between the active and middle forms of phi eta mu i in speech conslusions in homer}},
volume = {{140}},
year = {{2017}},
}