Advanced search
1 file | 207.47 KB Add to list

Associations between relational pronoun usage and the quality of early family interactions

Author
Organization
Abstract
Our study examined the relationships of relational pronouns used in parental conversation to the quality of early family interactions, as indexed by Family Alliance (FA). We hypothesized that more positive family interactions were associated with the use of more we-pronouns (e.g., we, us, our; we-ness) and fewer I- and you-pronouns (e.g., I, me, you, your; separateness) by both mothers and fathers. Our statistical model using a multilevel modeling framework and two levels of analysis (i.e., a couple level and an individual level) was tested on 47 non-referred families (n = 31 primiparous families; childs age, M = 15.75 months, SD = 2.73) with we-ness and separateness as outcomes and FA functions as between-dyads variables. Analyses revealed that we-ness within the parental couple was only positively associated with family affect sharing while separateness was negatively associated with different FA functions (e.g., communication mistakes). Our main finding suggested that the kinds of personal pronouns used by parental couples when discussing childrens education would be associated to the emotional quality of the family interactions.
Keywords
LANGUAGE USE, CLOSENESS, SCALE, family alliance, we-ness, separateness, early family interactions, pronoun usage

Downloads

  • Galdiolo Roskam2016 FiP.pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 207.47 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Galdiolo, Sarah, et al. “Associations between Relational Pronoun Usage and the Quality of Early Family Interactions.” FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 7, Frontiers Media Sa, 2016, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01719.
APA
Galdiolo, S., Roskam, I., Verhofstadt, L., De Mol, J., Dewinne, L., & Vandaudenard, S. (2016). Associations between relational pronoun usage and the quality of early family interactions. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01719
Chicago author-date
Galdiolo, Sarah, Isabelle Roskam, Lesley Verhofstadt, Jan De Mol, Laura Dewinne, and Sylvain Vandaudenard. 2016. “Associations between Relational Pronoun Usage and the Quality of Early Family Interactions.” FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01719.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Galdiolo, Sarah, Isabelle Roskam, Lesley Verhofstadt, Jan De Mol, Laura Dewinne, and Sylvain Vandaudenard. 2016. “Associations between Relational Pronoun Usage and the Quality of Early Family Interactions.” FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY 7. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01719.
Vancouver
1.
Galdiolo S, Roskam I, Verhofstadt L, De Mol J, Dewinne L, Vandaudenard S. Associations between relational pronoun usage and the quality of early family interactions. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY. 2016;7.
IEEE
[1]
S. Galdiolo, I. Roskam, L. Verhofstadt, J. De Mol, L. Dewinne, and S. Vandaudenard, “Associations between relational pronoun usage and the quality of early family interactions,” FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 7, 2016.
@article{8511904,
  abstract     = {{Our study examined the relationships of relational pronouns used in parental conversation to the quality of early family interactions, as indexed by Family Alliance (FA). We hypothesized that more positive family interactions were associated with the use of more we-pronouns (e.g., we, us, our; we-ness) and fewer I- and you-pronouns (e.g., I, me, you, your; separateness) by both mothers and fathers. Our statistical model using a multilevel modeling framework and two levels of analysis (i.e., a couple level and an individual level) was tested on 47 non-referred families (n = 31 primiparous families; childs age, M = 15.75 months, SD = 2.73) with we-ness and separateness as outcomes and FA functions as between-dyads variables. Analyses revealed that we-ness within the parental couple was only positively associated with family affect sharing while separateness was negatively associated with different FA functions (e.g., communication mistakes). Our main finding suggested that the kinds of personal pronouns used by parental couples when discussing childrens education would be associated to the emotional quality of the family interactions.}},
  articleno    = {{1719}},
  author       = {{Galdiolo, Sarah and Roskam, Isabelle and Verhofstadt, Lesley and De Mol, Jan and Dewinne, Laura and Vandaudenard, Sylvain}},
  issn         = {{1664-1078}},
  journal      = {{FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY}},
  keywords     = {{LANGUAGE USE,CLOSENESS,SCALE,family alliance,we-ness,separateness,early family interactions,pronoun usage}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{5}},
  publisher    = {{Frontiers Media Sa}},
  title        = {{Associations between relational pronoun usage and the quality of early family interactions}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01719}},
  volume       = {{7}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: