Advanced search
2 files | 590.77 KB Add to list

Faking revisited : exerting strategic control over performance on the implicit relational assessment procedure

Author
Organization
Abstract
Across four studies, we demonstrate that effects obtained from the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure, like those obtained from other indirect procedures, are not impervious to strategic manipulation. In experiment 1, we found that merely informing participants to "fake" their performance without providing a concrete strategy to do so did not eliminate, reverse, or in any way alter the obtained outcomes. However, when those same instructions orientated attention toward the core parameters of the task, participants spontaneously derived a strategy that allowed them to eliminate their effects (experiment 2). When the participants were provided with a viable response strategy, they successfully reversed the direction of their overall Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure effect (experiment 3). By refining the nature of those instructions, we managed to target and alter individual trial-type effects in isolation with some success (experiment 4).
Keywords
ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE IRAP, ASSOCIATION TEST, IAT, CONTROLLABILITY, METAANALYSIS, CRITERION, DOMINANCE, BELIEFS, MODEL, IRAP, faking, race, sexual, attitudes, disgust

Downloads

  • Hughes Hussey2016 EJoSP.pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 587.35 KB
  • dsfs Hughes Hussey2016 EJoSP.txt
    • data factsheet
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • Text
    • |
    • 3.42 KB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Hughes, Sean Joseph, et al. “Faking Revisited : Exerting Strategic Control over Performance on the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure.” EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 46, no. 5, Wiley-blackwell, 2016, pp. 632–48, doi:10.1002/ejsp.2207.
APA
Hughes, S. J., Hussey, I., Corrigan, B., Jolie, K., Murphy, C., & Barnes-Holmes, P. M. D. (2016). Faking revisited : exerting strategic control over performance on the implicit relational assessment procedure. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 46(5), 632–648. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2207
Chicago author-date
Hughes, Sean Joseph, Ian Hussey, Bethany Corrigan, Katie Jolie, Carol Murphy, and Patrick Michael Dermot Barnes-Holmes. 2016. “Faking Revisited : Exerting Strategic Control over Performance on the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure.” EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 46 (5): 632–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2207.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Hughes, Sean Joseph, Ian Hussey, Bethany Corrigan, Katie Jolie, Carol Murphy, and Patrick Michael Dermot Barnes-Holmes. 2016. “Faking Revisited : Exerting Strategic Control over Performance on the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure.” EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 46 (5): 632–648. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2207.
Vancouver
1.
Hughes SJ, Hussey I, Corrigan B, Jolie K, Murphy C, Barnes-Holmes PMD. Faking revisited : exerting strategic control over performance on the implicit relational assessment procedure. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY. 2016;46(5):632–48.
IEEE
[1]
S. J. Hughes, I. Hussey, B. Corrigan, K. Jolie, C. Murphy, and P. M. D. Barnes-Holmes, “Faking revisited : exerting strategic control over performance on the implicit relational assessment procedure,” EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 632–648, 2016.
@article{8509023,
  abstract     = {{Across four studies, we demonstrate that effects obtained from the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure, like those obtained from other indirect procedures, are not impervious to strategic manipulation. In experiment 1, we found that merely informing participants to "fake" their performance without providing a concrete strategy to do so did not eliminate, reverse, or in any way alter the obtained outcomes. However, when those same instructions orientated attention toward the core parameters of the task, participants spontaneously derived a strategy that allowed them to eliminate their effects (experiment 2). When the participants were provided with a viable response strategy, they successfully reversed the direction of their overall Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure effect (experiment 3). By refining the nature of those instructions, we managed to target and alter individual trial-type effects in isolation with some success (experiment 4).}},
  author       = {{Hughes, Sean Joseph and Hussey, Ian and Corrigan, Bethany and Jolie, Katie and Murphy, Carol and Barnes-Holmes, Patrick Michael Dermot}},
  issn         = {{0046-2772}},
  journal      = {{EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY}},
  keywords     = {{ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE IRAP,ASSOCIATION TEST,IAT,CONTROLLABILITY,METAANALYSIS,CRITERION,DOMINANCE,BELIEFS,MODEL,IRAP,faking,race,sexual,attitudes,disgust}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{5}},
  pages        = {{632--648}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley-blackwell}},
  title        = {{Faking revisited : exerting strategic control over performance on the implicit relational assessment procedure}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2207}},
  volume       = {{46}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: