Faking revisited : exerting strategic control over performance on the implicit relational assessment procedure
- Author
- Sean Joseph Hughes (UGent) , Ian Hussey (UGent) , Bethany Corrigan, Katie Jolie, Carol Murphy and Patrick Michael Dermot Barnes-Holmes (UGent)
- Organization
- Abstract
- Across four studies, we demonstrate that effects obtained from the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure, like those obtained from other indirect procedures, are not impervious to strategic manipulation. In experiment 1, we found that merely informing participants to "fake" their performance without providing a concrete strategy to do so did not eliminate, reverse, or in any way alter the obtained outcomes. However, when those same instructions orientated attention toward the core parameters of the task, participants spontaneously derived a strategy that allowed them to eliminate their effects (experiment 2). When the participants were provided with a viable response strategy, they successfully reversed the direction of their overall Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure effect (experiment 3). By refining the nature of those instructions, we managed to target and alter individual trial-type effects in isolation with some success (experiment 4).
- Keywords
- ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE IRAP, ASSOCIATION TEST, IAT, CONTROLLABILITY, METAANALYSIS, CRITERION, DOMINANCE, BELIEFS, MODEL, IRAP, faking, race, sexual, attitudes, disgust
Downloads
-
Hughes Hussey2016 EJoSP.pdf
- full text
- |
- open access
- |
- |
- 587.35 KB
-
dsfs Hughes Hussey2016 EJoSP.txt
- data factsheet
- |
- open access
- |
- Text
- |
- 3.42 KB
Citation
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8509023
- MLA
- Hughes, Sean Joseph, et al. “Faking Revisited : Exerting Strategic Control over Performance on the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure.” EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 46, no. 5, Wiley-blackwell, 2016, pp. 632–48, doi:10.1002/ejsp.2207.
- APA
- Hughes, S. J., Hussey, I., Corrigan, B., Jolie, K., Murphy, C., & Barnes-Holmes, P. M. D. (2016). Faking revisited : exerting strategic control over performance on the implicit relational assessment procedure. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 46(5), 632–648. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2207
- Chicago author-date
- Hughes, Sean Joseph, Ian Hussey, Bethany Corrigan, Katie Jolie, Carol Murphy, and Patrick Michael Dermot Barnes-Holmes. 2016. “Faking Revisited : Exerting Strategic Control over Performance on the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure.” EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 46 (5): 632–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2207.
- Chicago author-date (all authors)
- Hughes, Sean Joseph, Ian Hussey, Bethany Corrigan, Katie Jolie, Carol Murphy, and Patrick Michael Dermot Barnes-Holmes. 2016. “Faking Revisited : Exerting Strategic Control over Performance on the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure.” EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 46 (5): 632–648. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2207.
- Vancouver
- 1.Hughes SJ, Hussey I, Corrigan B, Jolie K, Murphy C, Barnes-Holmes PMD. Faking revisited : exerting strategic control over performance on the implicit relational assessment procedure. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY. 2016;46(5):632–48.
- IEEE
- [1]S. J. Hughes, I. Hussey, B. Corrigan, K. Jolie, C. Murphy, and P. M. D. Barnes-Holmes, “Faking revisited : exerting strategic control over performance on the implicit relational assessment procedure,” EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 632–648, 2016.
@article{8509023, abstract = {{Across four studies, we demonstrate that effects obtained from the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure, like those obtained from other indirect procedures, are not impervious to strategic manipulation. In experiment 1, we found that merely informing participants to "fake" their performance without providing a concrete strategy to do so did not eliminate, reverse, or in any way alter the obtained outcomes. However, when those same instructions orientated attention toward the core parameters of the task, participants spontaneously derived a strategy that allowed them to eliminate their effects (experiment 2). When the participants were provided with a viable response strategy, they successfully reversed the direction of their overall Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure effect (experiment 3). By refining the nature of those instructions, we managed to target and alter individual trial-type effects in isolation with some success (experiment 4).}}, author = {{Hughes, Sean Joseph and Hussey, Ian and Corrigan, Bethany and Jolie, Katie and Murphy, Carol and Barnes-Holmes, Patrick Michael Dermot}}, issn = {{0046-2772}}, journal = {{EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY}}, keywords = {{ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE IRAP,ASSOCIATION TEST,IAT,CONTROLLABILITY,METAANALYSIS,CRITERION,DOMINANCE,BELIEFS,MODEL,IRAP,faking,race,sexual,attitudes,disgust}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{5}}, pages = {{632--648}}, publisher = {{Wiley-blackwell}}, title = {{Faking revisited : exerting strategic control over performance on the implicit relational assessment procedure}}, url = {{http://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2207}}, volume = {{46}}, year = {{2016}}, }
- Altmetric
- View in Altmetric
- Web of Science
- Times cited: