Advanced search
1 file | 2.29 MB Add to list

French 'quantifiers' in questions : interface strategies

Lena Baunaz (UGent)
(2016) ACTA LINGUISTICA HUNGARICA. 63(2). p.125-168
Author
Organization
Project
Abstract
Building on an experimental study, I show that homophonous wh-phrases like qui 'who' in French correlate with prosodic differences when specificity and partitivity come into play, something not found with bare Universal Quantifiers like chacun 'each' and tous 'all'. Rather than homophony I claim that these wh-phrases are syncretic. I show that (a) wh-phrases and bare Universal Quantifiers are complex phrases, lexicalizing structures of different sizes; (b) partitivity and specificity are syntactic features. This last claim is supported by intervention effects: the interventions observed with negative and scope islands with wh-phrases in-situ are accounted for in terms of a feature-based Relativized Minimality (Starke 2001; Rizzi 2004).
Keywords
French, movement, wh in situ, nanosyntax, prosody, existential presupposition, Relativized Minimality, quantifiers

Downloads

  • Baunaz 2016 Acta Hungarica.pdf
    • full text
    • |
    • open access
    • |
    • PDF
    • |
    • 2.29 MB

Citation

Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:

MLA
Baunaz, Lena. “French ‘quantifiers’ in Questions : Interface Strategies.” ACTA LINGUISTICA HUNGARICA, vol. 63, no. 2, 2016, pp. 125–68, doi:10.1556/064.2016.63.2.1.
APA
Baunaz, L. (2016). French “quantifiers” in questions : interface strategies. ACTA LINGUISTICA HUNGARICA, 63(2), 125–168. https://doi.org/10.1556/064.2016.63.2.1
Chicago author-date
Baunaz, Lena. 2016. “French ‘quantifiers’ in Questions : Interface Strategies.” ACTA LINGUISTICA HUNGARICA 63 (2): 125–68. https://doi.org/10.1556/064.2016.63.2.1.
Chicago author-date (all authors)
Baunaz, Lena. 2016. “French ‘quantifiers’ in Questions : Interface Strategies.” ACTA LINGUISTICA HUNGARICA 63 (2): 125–168. doi:10.1556/064.2016.63.2.1.
Vancouver
1.
Baunaz L. French “quantifiers” in questions : interface strategies. ACTA LINGUISTICA HUNGARICA. 2016;63(2):125–68.
IEEE
[1]
L. Baunaz, “French ‘quantifiers’ in questions : interface strategies,” ACTA LINGUISTICA HUNGARICA, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 125–168, 2016.
@article{8507566,
  abstract     = {{Building on an experimental study, I show that homophonous wh-phrases like qui 'who' in French correlate with prosodic differences when specificity and partitivity come into play, something not found with bare Universal Quantifiers like chacun 'each' and tous 'all'. Rather than homophony I claim that these wh-phrases are syncretic. I show that (a) wh-phrases and bare Universal Quantifiers are complex phrases, lexicalizing structures of different sizes; (b) partitivity and specificity are syntactic features. This last claim is supported by intervention effects: the interventions observed with negative and scope islands with wh-phrases in-situ are accounted for in terms of a feature-based Relativized Minimality (Starke 2001; Rizzi 2004).}},
  author       = {{Baunaz, Lena}},
  issn         = {{1216-8076}},
  journal      = {{ACTA LINGUISTICA HUNGARICA}},
  keywords     = {{French,movement,wh in situ,nanosyntax,prosody,existential presupposition,Relativized Minimality,quantifiers}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{125--168}},
  title        = {{French 'quantifiers' in questions : interface strategies}},
  url          = {{http://doi.org/10.1556/064.2016.63.2.1}},
  volume       = {{63}},
  year         = {{2016}},
}

Altmetric
View in Altmetric
Web of Science
Times cited: